tags 156497 - unreproducible
thanks
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 10:45, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-04-10 21:50:28, schrieb Ken Bloom:
> > This bug still occurs with the current version in sid. I'm not sure
> > what must be done special to reproduce, since it's broken by
> > default on my system
Hello All,
Am 2007-04-24 22:49:58, schrieb Ken Bloom:
> tags 156497 - unreproducible
> thanks
> The relevant line of your broken strace is this one:
> 3794 execve("/usr/bin/apropos", ["apropos", "-M", "/usr/man", "ls"],
> [/* 75 vars */]) = 0
>
> I'm not sure why apropos is scanning those othe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 156497 - unreproducible
Bug#156497: xbase-clients: [xman] apropos does not work
Tags were: unreproducible upstream
Tags removed: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Am 2007-04-10 21:50:28, schrieb Ken Bloom:
> This bug still occurs with the current version in sid. I'm not sure what
> must be done special to reproduce, since it's broken by default on my
> system. The problem is still that in vendor.h, SYSMANPATH is being set
> to /usr/man. On my system, /usr
Hi *,
Am 2007-04-10 21:50:28, schrieb Ken Bloom:
> Version: 1:7.1.ds1-2
> This bug still occurs with the current version in sid. I'm not sure what
> must be done special to reproduce, since it's broken by default on my
> system. The problem is still that in vendor.h, SYSMANPATH is being set
>
Hello Brice,
Am 2007-04-09 15:43:05, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
> apropos not working, and you said last year that it was still not
> working, even if Denis couldn't reproduce the problem. Did you
> reproduce? With Xorg/Etch?
Ken Bloom wrote:
> This bug still occurs with the current version in sid. I'm not sure what
> must be done special to reproduce, since it's broken by default on my
> system. The problem is still that in vendor.h, SYSMANPATH is being set
> to /usr/man. On my system, /usr/man is a nonexistant dire
Version: 1:7.1.ds1-2
On Monday 09 April 2007 08:43, Brice Goglin wrote:
> About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
> apropos not working, and you said last year that it was still not
> working, even if Denis couldn't reproduce the problem. Did you
> reproduce? With Xorg/Et
Hi,
About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
apropos not working, and you said last year that it was still not
working, even if Denis couldn't reproduce the problem. Did you
reproduce? With Xorg/Etch? If so, could you give some hints about how to
reproduce?
Thanks,
Brice
9 matches
Mail list logo