Package: libx11-dev
Version: 2:1.4.4-2
Severity: important
The trivial C code:
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
return 0;
}
fails to compile with error:
In file included from foo.cpp:1:0:
/usr/include/X11/Xlibint.h:907:3: error: expected initializer before
‘_X_NORETURN’
Solution
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
> The following bugs seem to be identical:
> #601341
> #602418
> #604096
> They all seem to be fixed by this kernel:
> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/
> I think it would be a good idea to
> *) merge them all
> *) assign to l
reassign 601341 linux-2.6
found 601341 2.6.32-27
thanks
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:33:11AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 09:19 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:40:43AM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
>>> Hmm. So you are runn
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:06:23PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> This may not be specific to nouveau after all; I get the same result,
> but maybe for different reasons, with nv (and kernel booted with
> nomodeset parameter).
> Attached Xorg.0.log.old is nv on dom0. But what h
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:06:23PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane (25/10/2010):
>> When started on a Xen dom0, xorg / nouveau hangs the computer with a
>> black screen. Even CTRL-ALT-F2 and CTRL-ALT-DEL don't work anymore,
>> only Magic SysRq still w
This may not be specific to nouveau after all; I get the same result,
but maybe for different reasons, with nv (and kernel booted with
nomodeset parameter).
Attached Xorg.0.log.old is nv on dom0. But what happens there seems to
be different: keyboard-related error, and maybe nv just fucks up the
s
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Version: 1:0.0.15+git20100329+7858345-5
Severity: normal
When started on a Xen dom0, xorg / nouveau hangs the computer with a
black screen. Even CTRL-ALT-F2 and CTRL-ALT-DEL don't work anymore,
only Magic SysRq still works to reboot the machine.
Nouveau works f
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> X segfaults more or less randomly when I play videos with xine through
>> the XVideo extension.
> IIRC, some bugs like this have been fixed more or less recently.
> See #452372
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.2.0-1
Severity: important
Attach: /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old
X segfaults more or less randomly when I play videos with xine through
the XVideo extension. It does not segfault immediately, I can play
videos for tens of seconds or minutes, and then sudden
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:56:51PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Ah, I'll check next time it gets stuck.
It hasn't happened again since then... I now run 2:1.4.1~git20080131-1 .
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:25:53PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:13:11PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:49:59PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> Can you get a backtrace of the crash with gdb (you need to attac
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:13:11PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Hmm... How do I beat the race condition of X dying before I can attach
> to it? Can I simply run "startx" from a gdb in an SSH session?
Running "xinit" or "/usr/bin/X" from a gdb in a SSH s
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:13:11PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:49:59PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Can you get a backtrace of the crash with gdb (you need to attach
>> gdb to the X server from an ssh session)?
> Can I simply (...) core f
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:49:59PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:19:26 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:13:47AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:59:56PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>&g
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:13:47AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:59:56PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> - "setxkbmap -model microsoft -layout ca -option ''" crashes the
>>>server, too,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:59:56PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> - "setxkbmap -model microsoft -layout ca -option ''" crashes the
>>server, too, and also under a failsafe session
>> The Gnome crash thus probably happens w
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:12:00AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> At least some xkb options crash the server.
Further testing shows that:
- a failsafe terminal session starts OK with the xorg.conf file
present, as do "twm" and "safwish" sessions
- "setxkbmap
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:32:52PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Since my last upgrade (of many, many packages), the "alt" key
>> sometimes gets stuck in some weird way.
> Does xkbwatch report it as pressed?
Ah, I'll check next tim
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:22:47AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> If you still have the machine where the problem occurred in the
> past, is there any chance you try again in the near future
I can't reproduce the problem anymore.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
I have xserver-xorg version 1:7.1.0-15 and:
- It _does_ get overwritten, but backed up, after a
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
- there is a "man xorg.conf" in xserver-xorg-core
- the automatically generated xorg.conf does indeed instruct users to
use "man /etc/X11/xorg.conf", which does
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:01:18AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding X
> exiting while dpkg-reconfigure does autodetection. I can't reproduce
> here. Did you reproduce this problem recently?
No, since then, I've been extremely cautious
found 402658 2:1.1.1-18
severity 402658 serious
thanks
If I'm not mistaken, this should be severity serious, as per policy
7.5.1. I just got that on a partial upgrade on a etch/sid mixed
machine.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 02:08:52PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>> It might cut down a bit on your wpm (words per minute), that is
>> true.
> Definitely, yes. The occurences of a few accented characters in
> French are high enough for them to require single keystrokes to
> enter éèçàù characte
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:31:47AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Philippe Cloutier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> If I understand what Daniel wrote right, according to you French
>> Canadian keyboards are nearly impossible to buy in Montreal?
I'm surprised. A Canadian friend of mine bought m
Package: xfonts-encodings
Version: 1:1.0.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #367339
I worked around this by installing a newer xfonts-base directly with
dpkg.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'experimental')
I had the same problem, it got solved by replacing the font paths in
/etc/X11/xorg.conf; it now reads:
Section "Files"
#FontPath "unix/:7100"# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath"/us
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:49 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I really don't think it is done on purpose: Why bother going
>> through all the mode validation on the secondary, and _SELECT_ a
>> mode(line
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:58:36PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I read this too fast: What you report is exactly what this bug
>> report is about: 6.9.0-1 with MergedFB false doesn't send signal to
>> s
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:48:49PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
>> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Section "Device"
>>> Identifier "ATI Rade
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Section "Device"
>> Identifier "ATI Radeon 9200 SE Primary"
>> Driver "ati"
>>
found 320241 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
thanks
Reproduced bug on fresh amd64 install; that machine never had another
version of xserver-xorg than 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 installed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xorg
Version: 6.8
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
reopen 320241
thanks
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:24:02AM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Miércoles, 27 de Julio de 2005 21:42, Lionel Elie Mamane escribió:
>> Package: xserver-xorg
>> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3
>> Severity: normal
>> I run "dpkg-recon
Upgrade of xfree86-common fails at configure stage:
Setting up xfree86-common (6.8.2.dfsg.1-0pre1v1) ...
update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/xfree86-common exists during rc.d purge (use -f to
force)
dpkg: error processing xfree86-common (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error
tag 275492 -moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 07:09:27AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:27:17PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
>> Severity: normal
>> New install; the suggested driver is vesa, instead of
tags 275493 -moreinfo
severity 275493 wishlist
merge 275493 271525
thanks
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 07:11:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:33:06PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> New install; first debconf run at medium priority (I think. Maybe
>>
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
Severity: normal
New install; first debconf run at medium priority (I think. Maybe
high? Whatever baseconfig made). I said my monitor's best mode is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and a LCD, but X is configured for 800*600, not 1024*768.
It is an IBM X40 laptop
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
Severity: normal
New install; the suggested driver is vesa, instead of i810.
:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Integrated
Graphics Device (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
Subsystem: IBM: Unknown device 0557
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7
Severity: normal
In continuation of my message in bug 256706. As it has been declared
fixed, but I still suffer keyboard problems, I suppose my problem is
_not_ the one of this bug. Behaviour has changed since -6, but is
still not correct.
I have a Microsoft
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
Followup-For: Bug #256706
I don't know if it is the same bug or not, but I have similar, but
other, keyboard troubles.
My configuration is (I tried with XkbModel pc104, it doesn't change
anything as far as I can see):
Section "InputDevice"
Identifie
ixed
(unstable attitude ;-) ) but after that the machine just stood
idle here until this post. So I think that many other users that are
confronted to this problem won't find a quick solution either.
Greetings and thanks a lot for this post
--
Elie De Brauwer
http://www.de-bra
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-8
Severity: normal
As promised on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=185403, now that it
has reached sid, I file a bug.
When trying to use XVideo on an IBM Thinkpad T21, instead of the
movie, I have uniform blue. Tim Roberts' driver version 1.
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-8
Severity: normal
As promised on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=185403, now that it
has reached sid, I file a bug.
When trying to use XVideo on an IBM Thinkpad T21, instead of the
movie, I have uniform blue. Tim Roberts' driver version 1.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 11:03:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> You can try my experimental pre-release .debs that reputedly fix this
> problem; just visit the website in my .signature.
> Please let me know if you try those and they *don't* fix your problem.
They solve the problem of X not w
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 11:03:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> You can try my experimental pre-release .debs that reputedly fix this
> problem; just visit the website in my .signature.
> Please let me know if you try those and they *don't* fix your problem.
They solve the problem of X not w
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: important
The last update broke my setup: On startup, the screen starts black,
then gets mostly blank, with a dark patch that grows up to most of the
screen, as if the screen (LCD panel) was gradually burning.
I'm using am IBM Thinkpad T21. Here
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: important
The last update broke my setup: On startup, the screen starts black,
then gets mostly blank, with a dark patch that grows up to most of the
screen, as if the screen (LCD panel) was gradually burning.
I'm using am IBM Thinkpad T21. Here
47 matches
Mail list logo
