Re: success with ct65554

2000-11-17 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > Congratulations! I'm happy to hear that you got success. > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on "Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:33:39 -0500", with "success with ct65554 ", > "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: success with ct65554

2000-11-17 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > Congratulations! I'm happy to hear that you got success. > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on "Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:33:39 -0500", with "success with ct65554 ", > "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

success with ct65554

2000-11-16 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
ent than the one for 8bpp on which I was basing my guesses. The full XFree86.0.log is attached for anyone interested in the details. Many thanks Tom -- Thomas R. Shemanske (Mailing Address) (Office/Internet Information) Department of Mathe

success with ct65554

2000-11-16 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
ferent than the one for 8bpp on which I was basing my guesses. The full XFree86.0.log is attached for anyone interested in the details. Many thanks Tom -- Thomas R. Shemanske (Mailing Address) (Office/Internet Information) Department of Mathe

Re: 16bpp @ 1024x768 with ct65554?

2000-11-13 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
round color. It's just that I have a 150 x 768 panel. Since the xserver won't allow me to adjust the dot clock, can you suggest a systematic way of testing modelines? Right now my efforts are fairly random. Thanks Tom -- Thomas R. Shemanske (Mailing A

Re: 16bpp @ 1024x768 with ct65554?

2000-11-13 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
t's just that I have a 150 x 768 panel. Since the xserver won't allow me to adjust the dot clock, can you suggest a systematic way of testing modelines? Right now my efforts are fairly random. Thanks Tom -- Thomas R. Shemanske (Mailing Address)

Re: 16bpp @ 1024x768 with ct65554?

2000-11-10 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > Hi. > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on Thu, 09 Nov 2000 17:51:13 -0500, > on 16bpp @ 1024x768 with ct65554?, > "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > After the 4.0.1e release my xserver is again

Re: 16bpp @ 1024x768 with ct65554?

2000-11-10 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > Hi. > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on Thu, 09 Nov 2000 17:51:13 -0500, > on 16bpp @ 1024x768 with ct65554?, > "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > After the 4.0.1e release my xserver is again

16bpp @ 1024x768 with ct65554?

2000-11-09 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
slots 32 8x8 color expansion slots (==) CHIPS(0): Backing store disabled (WW) CHIPS(0): Option "SetDclk" is not used (II) Setting vga for screen 0. (II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM (II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension (II) Initializing built-in exte

16bpp @ 1024x768 with ct65554?

2000-11-09 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
slots 32 8x8 color expansion slots (==) CHIPS(0): Backing store disabled (WW) CHIPS(0): Option "SetDclk" is not used (II) Setting vga for screen 0. (II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM (II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension (II) Initializing built-in exte