Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment

2003-09-05 Thread Thomas Fischbacher
> > This is Xnest's stderr, as is clearly seen by starting enlightenment > > from a different tty. > > Clearly? Then I'm probably blind... Look: === xterm #1 === [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /proc/self/fd total 0 dr-x--2 tf tf 0 Sep 5 17:37 . dr-xr-xr-x3 tf

Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment

2003-09-05 Thread Thomas Fischbacher
> > This is Xnest's stderr, as is clearly seen by starting enlightenment > > from a different tty. > > Clearly? Then I'm probably blind... Look: === xterm #1 === [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /proc/self/fd total 0 dr-x--2 tf tf 0 Sep 5 17:37 . dr-xr-xr-x3 tf

Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment

2003-09-05 Thread Thomas Fischbacher
age failed! I should add that my machine usually does not exhibit strange behaviour when I do long calculations or compile large projects. -- regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p

Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment

2003-09-05 Thread Thomas Fischbacher
age failed! I should add that my machine usually does not exhibit strange behaviour when I do long calculations or compile large projects. -- regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r)

Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment

2003-09-04 Thread Thomas Fischbacher
> severity 208683 important Oh, sooorry... forgot to classify it myself. > What architecture are you using? i386 (Pentium IV). > We should probably get an unstripped > Xnest binary into your hands, so that a core dump can be analyzed. Can build one myself. Tomorrow. (Just checking mail from a

Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment

2003-09-04 Thread Thomas Fischbacher
> severity 208683 important Oh, sooorry... forgot to classify it myself. > What architecture are you using? i386 (Pentium IV). > We should probably get an unstripped > Xnest binary into your hands, so that a core dump can be analyzed. Can build one myself. Tomorrow. (Just checking mail from a

Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment

2003-09-04 Thread Thomas Fischbacher
Package: xnest Version: 4.2.1-6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :2 & [1] 19166 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ DISPLAY=:2.0 enlightenment Xlib: extension "MIT-SHM" missing on display ":2.0". (...) Xlib: e

Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment

2003-09-04 Thread Thomas Fischbacher
Package: xnest Version: 4.2.1-6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :2 & [1] 19166 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ DISPLAY=:2.0 enlightenment Xlib: extension "MIT-SHM" missing on display ":2.0". (...) Xlib: e