Bug#366001: xbase-clients: startx fails with no EE message

2006-05-04 Thread Ron Johnson
Package: xbase-clients Version: 1:7.0.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading from 7.0.0-5 (really, a weekly unstable upgrade) startx stopped working. The screen goes blank like normal, and "clicks", but after a moment returns to the $ prompt. There are no no

Bug#357713: Fixed...

2006-04-12 Thread Ron Johnson
Now that xorg 7.0.10 is in unstable, this problem does not manifest itself anymore. -- - Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA "If a politician murders his mother, the first response of the press will likely be not that it

Bug#357714: font directories still wrong in xorg 7.0.4

2006-03-18 Thread Ron Johnson
Package: xorg Version: 1:7.0.4 Severity: important Tags: experimental Hi, Bug #356181 is still alive. I just upgraded from 6.9.0 to 7.0.4, and the old/wrong font paths were still there in /etc/X11/xorg.conf. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT po

Bug#357713: xbase-clients: startx in xorg 7.0.4 forgets default wm & session manager

2006-03-18 Thread Ron Johnson
Package: xbase-clients Version: 1:7.0.0-1 Severity: important Tags: experimental After upgrading from Sid 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 to experimental 7.0.4, startx forgets that my system's default DE is GNOME, and fires up a barren xterm window. In that xterm, I must run these commands to get to GNOME: met

Bug#292441: What worked for me

2005-02-08 Thread Ron Johnson
# chmod 4755 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 -- Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: E-mail account security warning.

2004-03-03 Thread Ron Johnson
t; > - That's a clever bit of newbie-oriented social engineering. Too bad there are grammatical mistakes. -- - Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA I

Re: Question on X and new license...

2004-03-03 Thread Ron Johnson
ributor to Debian's X packaging has > > any objection to the above statements, please speak up.) > > I fully oppose to the SDK statement. It is unacceptable. Because > My opinion. Certainly not Uday Hussein's. -- --

Re: Question on X and new license...

2004-03-02 Thread Ron Johnson
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 05:19, Thomas Dickey wrote: > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (replying to a troll) > >> > > >> > (I really hope not to start a flame war ...) > >> > >> They don't want people to be able to legally remov

Re: Question on X and new license...

2004-03-01 Thread Ron Johnson
their advertising without changing the > > licenses or impacting Xfree developers. > > > > Cheers > > > > (I really hope not to start a flame war ...) > > They don't want people to be able to legally remove the advertisement. And that violates the GPL'