On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 03:52, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > El Lunes, 23 de Febrero de 2004 05:43, Branden Robinson escribió: > [...] > > * Code that forms part of the XFree86 SDK, a driver development kit > > (which there has been some work to package for Debian) *is* under the > > X-Oz license, and would prohibit the development of GPL-licensed > > drivers for the XFree86 X server. > > > [...] > > > > (Fellow debian-x subscribers: I'd like your feedback on this message, as > > once debian-legal has made its decision regarding the DFSG-freeness of > > the X-Oz license, I'd like to re-purpose it, perhaps as a mail to > > debian-devel-announce and/or as a position statement to placed on the X > > Strike Force news page. If any contributor to Debian's X packaging has > > any objection to the above statements, please speak up.) > > I fully oppose to the SDK statement. It is unacceptable.
Because.... > My opinion. Certainly not Uday Hussein's. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA In 1929, when the Great Depresion hit, while all the other tabulating companies retrenched, Thomas Watson Sr. insisted that IBM's factories stay open and R&D spending increase. Thus, in 1935 when FDR signed the Social Security Act, and businesses and gov't had a huge need for tabulating/sorting machines, IBM was in position to dominate the industry, and did so for the next 45 years.
