I think the version-number in the
package-name is butt ugly and hard to remember it does fulfill a task,
and that is letting me know which extensions I can expect to find in
there.
/Peter Toneby
--
Alpha Test Version: Too buggy to be released to the paying public.
Beta Test Version: Still too b
I think the version-number in the
package-name is butt ugly and hard to remember it does fulfill a task,
and that is letting me know which extensions I can expect to find in
there.
/Peter Toneby
--
Alpha Test Version: Too buggy to be released to the paying public.
Beta Test Version: Still too b
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:56:57AM +0900, ChanChan KO wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-0pre1v2
> Architecture: i386
> Severity: Normal
>
> Hello,
> I'm testing XFree86 4.2.1 built by Branden.
>
> When using any of Java Programs with Japanese "kanji" Menu (i.e. "King of
> Tra
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:56:57AM +0900, ChanChan KO wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-0pre1v2
> Architecture: i386
> Severity: Normal
>
> Hello,
> I'm testing XFree86 4.2.1 built by Branden.
>
> When using any of Java Programs with Japanese "kanji" Menu (i.e. "King of
> Tr
mewhat random
amount, somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3s of the screen, and the area where
the image should be is only the standard X-hatch pattern.
I tried using Option "ShadowFB" "off" but that made the colors got all
wrong, except for the X-hatch pattern.
/Peter Toneby
--
Alp
mewhat random
amount, somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3s of the screen, and the area where
the image should be is only the standard X-hatch pattern.
I tried using Option "ShadowFB" "off" but that made the colors got all
wrong, except for the X-hatch pattern.
/Peter Toneby
--
Alp
doing startx, I'm reluctant to
> try it out as root ;-)
> What did I overlook this time?
What does the second line in /etc/X11/Xserver say?
It "should" say Console
There are also the options Anybody and RootOnly.
/Peter Toneby
--
Alpha Test Version: Too buggy to be released to
doing startx, I'm reluctant to
> try it out as root ;-)
> What did I overlook this time?
What does the second line in /etc/X11/Xserver say?
It "should" say Console
There are also the options Anybody and RootOnly.
/Peter Toneby
--
Alpha Test Version: Too buggy to be released to
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 03:22:29AM -0500, Derek J Witt wrote:
> Have you tried running xf86cfg, xf86config, or XFree86 -configure? Just a
> thought.
Yes, xf86cfg dies quite fast, and doesn't work for me, but I had an
"old" XF4-config that I use. And there is a report further down about
the cause of
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 03:22:29AM -0500, Derek J Witt wrote:
> Have you tried running xf86cfg, xf86config, or XFree86 -configure? Just a
> thought.
Yes, xf86cfg dies quite fast, and doesn't work for me, but I had an
"old" XF4-config that I use. And there is a report further down about
the cause o
End File ---
I don't see anything wrong there.
Also, shouldn't the xdm-package provide /etc/init.d/xdm?
/Peter Toneby
--
Alpha Test Version: Too buggy to be released to the paying public.
Beta Test Version: Still too buggy to be released.
Release Version: Alternate pronunciation of "Beta Test Version".
End File ---
I don't see anything wrong there.
Also, shouldn't the xdm-package provide /etc/init.d/xdm?
/Peter Toneby
--
Alpha Test Version: Too buggy to be released to the paying public.
Beta Test Version: Still too buggy to be released.
Release Version: Alternate pronunciat
12 matches
Mail list logo
