you are an appropriate DD.
>>
> No, I'm just annoyed at myself for the mistake, and at whoever picked
> the ppc64 arch name because it doesn't seem to make sense to use that
> when our ppc port is called powerpc.
OK, sorry, it seems that I misunderstood you a little.
R
Hi, Julien.
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 23:02:32 +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>
>> Control: reopen -1
>> Control: found -1 libx11/2:1.6.1-1
>> Control: severity -1 important
>>
>> The change at ver. 2:1.6.1-1 is not to add supporting
ew patch added furthermore "ppc64" port.
Regards,
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
diff -Nurd libx11-1.6.1.orig/debian/libx11-6.symbols libx11-1.6.1/debian/libx11-6.symbols
--- libx11-1.6.1.orig/debian/libx11-6.symbols 2013-08-13 21:23:09.0 +090
A question?
You should learn courtesy to contributors.
Regards,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:10:58 +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>
>> Hi, Julien.
>>
>> If your remark of "ppc64 was dead and buried" (Bug#613820)" is also united
>
Archive Maintainer wrote:
>
>> Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
>> Uploader: Hiroyuki Yamamoto
>
> Please don't spam debian package maintainers with your uploads.
>
> Thanks,
> Julien
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5
on non-x86, indeed.
I think so, too, but FTBFS on ppc64 is no good.
So, I don't care that maintainers decide whether this patch
should be forwarded to upstream or not.
Regards,
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
; refereeing and judgment that this patch should be
sent to upstream,
I contributed to BTS.
Do you say that it shoudn't be sent to upstream?
Regards,
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debi
Hi,
Ping.
What state is it about this bug now?
Regards,
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Package: libx11
Version: 1.4.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please support ppc64.
Regards,
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
diff -Nurd libx11-1.4.1.orig/debian/libx11-6.symbols libx11-1.4.1/debian/libx11-6.symbols
--- libx11-1.4.1.orig/debian/libx11-6
Oh, I'm sorry.
Only the xserver-xorg-core package doesn't cause this phenomenon.
Actually it occurs on rebuilded package of 2:1.4.1~git20080131-1 on the
present sid,
though it doesn't occur on the same package downloaded from
snapshot.debian.net.
Maybe it occurs because of difference of dev librar
Hi,
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>> Package: xserver-xorg-core
>> Version: 2:1.4.99.905-1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>>
>> X does not start for lack of /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri2.so
>> file.
>>
>
> N
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.4.99.905-1
Severity: normal
X does not start for lack of /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri2.so
file.
I suggest that it should be included in the xserver-xorg-core package.
-
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
-- /etc/X11/xorg.conf:
# /etc/X11/xorg.conf (xorg
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>> Xorg does not run if xorg (2:1.4.1~git20080131-3) already runs on the
>> other chroot.
>> If I run startx, it says as follows:
>> _XSERVTransSocketINETCreateListener: ...SocketCreateListener() failed
>> _XSERVTransM
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.4.1~git20080131-3
Xorg does not run if xorg (2:1.4.1~git20080131-3) already runs on the
other chroot.
If I run startx, it says as follows:
_XSERVTransSocketINETCreateListener: ...SocketCreateListener() failed
_XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: server al
14 matches
Mail list logo
