Re: xfree86 4.2.1-0pre1v1 available at the X Strike Force

2002-10-23 Thread Erik van Roode
At 09:36 10/22/2002, Branden Robinson wrote: I beseech you to help debug and fix the XFree86 module loader on m68k. If I understand correctly the issue with 68040/68060 is cache coherency. When looking at the 68040 manual from Motorola, (page 4-10): > It is imperative that a CPUSHA ins

Re: xfree86 4.2.1-0pre1v1 available at the X Strike Force

2002-10-23 Thread Erik van Roode
At 09:36 10/22/2002, Branden Robinson wrote: I beseech you to help debug and fix the XFree86 module loader on m68k. If I understand correctly the issue with 68040/68060 is cache coherency. When looking at the 68040 manual from Motorola, (page 4-10): > It is imperative that a CPUSHA instr

Re: promising news regarding the XFree86 4.x server on m68k

2001-12-08 Thread Erik van Roode
At 4:59 -0500 8/9/01, Branden Robinson wrote: I was, I think, wrong about how much work needs to be done to get the XFree86 X server working on m68k. As far as I can tell from the source code to XFree86's module loader, support code for m68k already exists. The issue is, apparently, just that i

Re: promising news regarding the XFree86 4.x server on m68k

2001-12-08 Thread Erik van Roode
At 4:59 -0500 8/9/01, Branden Robinson wrote: >I was, I think, wrong about how much work needs to be done to get the >XFree86 X server working on m68k. > >As far as I can tell from the source code to XFree86's module loader, >support code for m68k already exists. The issue is, apparently, just >t