On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:53:21AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Sebastien Picard wrote:
>
> > You have to remove the mga_hal.so file to have a good cursor.
>
> If I do that, it refuses to start at all, complaining that mga_hal.so
> can't be found.
I got the complaint, but
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:53:21AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Sebastien Picard wrote:
>
> > You have to remove the mga_hal.so file to have a good cursor.
>
> If I do that, it refuses to start at all, complaining that mga_hal.so
> can't be found.
I got the complaint, but
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Sebastien Picard wrote:
> You have to remove the mga_hal.so file to have a good cursor.
Thanks, I'll try that.
Cheers
Dave
>
> Dave Swegen wrote:
>
> >Everything seems to work fine, apart from the cursor which has been
>
Everything seems to work fine, apart from the cursor which has been
turned into a square made up of vertical lines. Turning off the hwcursor
fixes the problem. This is discussed in the following mail from the
freebsd-ports mailing list:
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/167/2002/4/100/8520909/
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Sebastien Picard wrote:
> You have to remove the mga_hal.so file to have a good cursor.
Thanks, I'll try that.
Cheers
Dave
>
> Dave Swegen wrote:
>
> >Everything seems to work fine, apart from the cursor which has been
Everything seems to work fine, apart from the cursor which has been
turned into a square made up of vertical lines. Turning off the hwcursor
fixes the problem. This is discussed in the following mail from the
freebsd-ports mailing list:
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/167/2002/4/100/8520909/
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:14:46PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:54:06PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> > Not sure if I'm being thick here (probably), but I can't get either kdm
> > or wdm to read ~/.xsession. /etc/X11/Xsession/Xsession.option
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:14:46PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:54:06PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> > Not sure if I'm being thick here (probably), but I can't get either kdm
> > or wdm to read ~/.xsession. /etc/X11/Xsession/Xsession.option
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:54:06PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> > Not sure if I'm being thick here (probably), but I can't get either kdm
> > or wdm to read ~/.xsession. /etc/X11/Xsession/Xsession.option
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:54:06PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> > Not sure if I'm being thick here (probably), but I can't get either kdm
> > or wdm to read ~/.xsession. /etc/X11/Xsession/Xsession.option
Not sure if I'm being thick here (probably), but I can't get either kdm
or wdm to read ~/.xsession. /etc/X11/Xsession/Xsession.options contains
allow-user-xsession, and xdm works fine. Thought I'd check here before
filing it as a bug against those two packages.
Cheers
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Not sure if I'm being thick here (probably), but I can't get either kdm
or wdm to read ~/.xsession. /etc/X11/Xsession/Xsession.options contains
allow-user-xsession, and xdm works fine. Thought I'd check here before
filing it as a bug against those two packages.
Cheers
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:47:30PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Dave Swegen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:56:04AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Wilfried Goesgens wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:47:30PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Dave Swegen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:56:04AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Wilfried Goesgens wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:56:04AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Wilfried Goesgens wrote:
>
> > > > Please excuse me, if I'm wrong here with my problems here and tell me
> > > > were to go.
>
> > > Xpert@XFree86.Org
>
> > > The ati driver maintainer reads that list.
>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:56:04AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Wilfried Goesgens wrote:
>
> > > > Please excuse me, if I'm wrong here with my problems here and tell me
> > > > were to go.
>
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > The ati driver maintainer reads that list.
Does anyone know how to enable the numeric keypad on a thinkpad? Under
windows the shift+numlk combo is used to toggle the numeric keypad on
and off. However, under X 4.0.3 this doesn't work, it merely makes the
relevant keys unusable.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Cheers
Dave
Does anyone know how to enable the numeric keypad on a thinkpad? Under
windows the shift+numlk combo is used to toggle the numeric keypad on
and off. However, under X 4.0.3 this doesn't work, it merely makes the
relevant keys unusable.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Cheers
Dave
--
I found this problem too. What I found is that I had to run dexconf
after the configuration was done. Mind you, the config it generated was
broken with regards to the pointer section...
Cheers
Dave
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:07:30PM +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>
> CS> Hi,
> CS> since I d
I found this problem too. What I found is that I had to run dexconf
after the configuration was done. Mind you, the config it generated was
broken with regards to the pointer section...
Cheers
Dave
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:07:30PM +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>
> CS> Hi,
> CS> since I
--
Dave Swegen | Debian 2.2 on Linux i386 2.2
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG key available on request
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Linux: The Choice of a GNU Generation
---
--
Dave Swegen | Debian 2.2 on Linux i386 2.2
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG key available on request
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Linux: The Choice of a GNU Generation
---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi! Last night I attempted to upgrade X from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 in testing
(Version 4.0.2-1 I believe). Upgrade went fine. However, when restarting
X it went into an infinite loop and started hogging 99.8% CPU time.
Running strace showed that it got as far as reading and parsing
/etc/X11/Xwrapper.confi
Hi! Last night I attempted to upgrade X from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 in testing
(Version 4.0.2-1 I believe). Upgrade went fine. However, when restarting
X it went into an infinite loop and started hogging 99.8% CPU time.
Running strace showed that it got as far as reading and parsing
/etc/X11/Xwrapper.conf
24 matches
Mail list logo
