Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 05:48 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Julien & debian-x@,
>
> Adam D. Barratt (2017-01-28):
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 14:40 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > +libx
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2015-07-08 22:11, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt (2015-07-08):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 15:02 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
> | * Merge from upstream master:
> | + modesetting: Don't pretend
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 19:58 +0100, Stephan Schreiber wrote:
> The xserver-xorg-video-all package doesn't install the following xorg
> video drivers on ia64:
The changelog says that's intentional:
* Drop some videos drivers from the xserver-xorg-video-all meta package
on ia64, they were
Source: compiz
Version: 0.8.4-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
compiz fails to build when binNMUed, on all architectures; from the
amd64 log:
/usr/bin/ld: window.o: undefined reference to symbol 'KIcon::~KIcon()'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'KIcon::~KIcon()' is defined in DSO /usr/lib64/libkdeui.so.5
so try addi
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 19:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 20:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt (09/04/2011):
> > > There's one small issue - xserver-xorg-input-{ev,fb}dev-udeb/sparc
> > > now depend on xserver-xorg-core-ud
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 20:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (09/04/2011):
> > Having been looking at some test runs this afternoon, it looks like we
> > can mostly get this and the kernel done if we also:
> >
> > - age xf86-video-omapfb
> >
>
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 19:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (24/02/2011):
> > just to let you know a bit in advance, the following packages should
> > be mostly ready to transition in like a week:
>
> Tiny update:
[...]
> > - xorg
> Too young, since we were waiting for the kernel
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 21:08 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (18/02/2011):
> > What are the potential side-effects of removing the check; i.e. what
> > issue was it introduced to guard against in the first place?
[...]
> I'd call it “just a sanity check”.
O
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:32 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> | xorg-server (2:1.7.7-13) stable; urgency=low
> |
> | * bug script: Report KMS configuration files and their contents.
> | * bug script: Keep only one lspci call (with proper filtering), which
> | makes PCI IDs come back.
> | *
On Fri, February 18, 2011 13:37, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (18/02/2011):
>> > I've reproduced both issues on my laptop, verified the fixes
>> > worked fine, and I haven't noticed any regression.
>>
>> Were your tests against unstable, or s
On Fri, February 18, 2011 13:16, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> | xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.13.0-6) stable; urgency=low
> |
> | * Cherry-pick from upstream:
> | - uxa: Fallback if the temporary is too large
> | * This fixes a null pointer dereference with some rendering operations
> | inv
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
Given its upload history (or more accurately in recent times, its lack
of the same), Julien suggested that we might be better off simply
dropping xresprobe. The only package w
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
>
> | gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c -o lrmi.o lrmi.c
> | lrmi.c: In function 'set_regs':
> | lrmi.c:191: error: 'IF_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
[...]
> Other p
On Mon, November 8, 2010 10:24, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 16:50:24 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for
>> > d
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for
> documentation reasons. Currently, we have in sid/squeeze a snapshot
> from upstream, namely: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2. There were only a few
> commits upstream between what we m
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 03:04 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 17:14:57 -0800, Lei Zhang wrote:
>
> > There's a race condition in libXext that causes apps that use the X shared
> > memory extensions to occasionally crash. [1][2] This has been fixed upstream
> > with a small pat
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:25 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> El Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> > >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in
> >
> > unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer
> > disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with
> >
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 14:51 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I broke the xserver-xorg package's postinst script in the lenny r2
> update. Maximiliano was kind enough to fix my mistake and test the
> updated package, which is sitting in p-u-new. Please accept for 5.0.3
> (sooner is probably better,
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
# Sorry, typoed the bug number
severity 493290 important
severity 493920 wishlist
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package x11-common
severity 366120 grave
merge 366120 365948
thanks
On Friday, May 05, 2006 11:34 AM, Markus Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 1:7.0.16
> Severity: important
>
> The last update brings a problem with /etc/X11/Xsession(.xfree86).
Indeed, as already r
package x11-common
severity 366007 grave
merge 366007 365948
thanks
On Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:52 PM, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since installing x11-common 1:7.0.16, /etc/X11/Xsession has been
> deleted. This means that startx no longer works
>
> According to dpkg --search, /etc/
package xserver-xorg
severity 365693 grave
merge 365693 365282
thanks
On Tuesday, May 02, 2006 7:30 AM, Pelgrims Jean-Francois
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.14
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> With my last apt-get upgrade, I got an error 10 with xserver-xorg
>
packages xserver-xorg
submitter 363359 Rob Bochan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
merge 363359 363361
thanks
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 13:27 -0400, Rob Bochan wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.14
> Severity: normal
Please don't file duplicate bugs. As far as I can see the only
difference is that th
reassign 363293 xtrlock
severity 363293 important
merge 363293 362206
thanks
On Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:51 AM, Marcus Frings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 1:7.0.14
> Severity: normal
>
> aptitude install xtrlock
> The following packages are BROKEN:
> x11-common
reassign 358682 libxft-dev
close 358682 2.1.8.2-4
merge 358682 358439
thanks
On Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:23 PM, Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: important
>
> Preparing to replace x11-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (using
> .../x11-common_
Hi,
On Friday, March 24, 2006 12:45 AM, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had problem upgrading some machines that runs sid here. Looks like
> x11-common needs to provide libxft-dev. I was upgrading to x11 -5
> packages.
This was actually a bug in libxft-dev, which needed
reassign 358629 libxft-dev
close 358629 2.1.8.2-4
merge 358629 358439
thanks
Bryan Donlan wrote, Thursday, March 23, 2006 4:02 PM
> Upgrade of x11-common to 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 fails with:
> Preparing to replace x11-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (using
.../x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking re
On Monday, February 27, 2006 11:09 AM, Tom Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xorg relies on the libgl1-mesa package, which I can't find a copy of
> anywhere in the Debian archives
Thanks. This is already known and will be fixed in the next upload:
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-02-24 00:31:29 -05
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:19 AM, Svein E. Seldal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Help!
>
> Does anyone have the "xserver-xorg_6.8.2*.deb" for i386 lying around?
> The files on the official Debian servers have been updated to 6.9.0
> and the old ones deleted!
snapshot.debian.net will -
http:/
package xbase-clients
severity 345671 normal
merge 345671 345446
thanks
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 19:55 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> The new /usr/X11R6/bin/startx script contains statement that is
> is not /bin/sh compatible. I us
On Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:37 PM, Paolo Pantaleo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I send this to the lists since bugs system said that there is no
> mantainer for this package (hoping doing right)
gnome-desktop-enviro*n*ment /does/ have a maintainer. The package you
attempted to report a bug ag
On Friday, July 15, 2005 10:09 AM, Keenan Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Subject: libglu1-xorg-dev: Should not depend on any C++ libraries
> Followup-For: Bug #318353
> Package: libglu1-xorg-dev
>
> libglu1-xorg-dev currently depends on libstdc++6-dev; submitter of
> this bug suggested it sho
package xbase-clients
close 308448
thanks
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:12 AM Anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
>
> !!![OOps. Typo in previous mail...]!!
Please don't open a new bug report just to correct a typo.
Clos
On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:50 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Call me a retard, but I cannot find the bug on http://bugs.xfree.org
> ... Which ID?
Why do you think there should be one? I can't see anything in Branden's mail
that implies there is.
If you're referring to the
package xfs
close 286502
merge 286502 285133
thanks
On Monday, December 20, 2004 2:10 PM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xfs
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> hi,
> there i a mistake in /etc/init.d/xfs:
In fact, your patch is exactly what was done in
On Friday, December 17, 2004 10:14 AM, Sven Bachmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I just upgraded to xdm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 and after a restart my window
> manager won't come up.
> So I read the xdm log and found out, that sessreg wasn't called
> correctly.
>
> In /etc/X11/xdm/Xstartup at line 24 ther
package xfs
close 286043
merge 286043 285133
thanks
On Friday, December 17, 2004 3:33 AM, Mike Mestnik) (the Archmage forever
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xfs
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9
> Severity: normal
>
> Line 24 of /etc/init.d/xfs should read...
> if [ -e $SOCKET_DIR -a ! -d $SOCKET_
# There's no way this is a security bug
package xutils
tags 285075 - security
severity 285075 normal
thanks control
On Friday, December 10, 2004 1:56 PM, D Goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xutils
> Version: 4.1.0-16woody4
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
>
> This is a pure woody s
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 21:16, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:01:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 16:25, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 16:25, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
> Severity: normal
> lynx is used to generate plaintext docs: it's a missing build
> dependency.
lynx *is* listed as a Build-Dependency, as of 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6. -8 is
currently in
On Friday, October 01, 2004 1:06 PM, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a small nit-pick, but I guess now's a good time to change it. ;-)
[...]
>xorg/trunk/debian/scripts/indipendent-sources
s/indipendent/independent/g
(ditto for a comment in r16)
Regards,
FYI, the submitter's e-mail is currently bouncing due to being over
quota. *sigh*
-Forwarded Message-
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:00:11 -0700
This message was crea
# bts control commands
package xserver-xfree86
severity 253172 normal
merge 253172 249447
thanks
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 18:03, Philipp wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
> When trying to install xserver-xfr
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 18:52, Fedor Karpelevitch wrote:
> I am getting the same problem with 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 and there is no
> helpful output as to what the root cause is. I followed instructions
> for setting env vars but that does not produce any more output.
>
> Is there any way to find the ro
# Bug control commands
package xserver-xfree86
merge 249447 251690
thanks
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 14:59, Roni Balthazar wrote:
> Getting the error bellow when updating xserver-xfree86
> Setting up xserver-xfree86 (4.3.0-7) ...
> dpkg: error processing xserver-xfree86 (--configure):
> subprocess pos
# Bug control commands
package xserver-xfree86
merge 252379 251690
thanks
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 02:02, Sean Proctor wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: normal
>
> when trying to install xserver-xfree86 from .deb I get this:
[...]
> subprocess pre-installation
package xlibs
severity 251611 important
merge 251511 251119
thanks
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 19:46, Harald Nordgård-Hansen wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: sid
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> For some reason, the latest xlibs package has re
48 matches
Mail list logo
