retitle 509699 want a large Virtual Desktop (RandR 1.3 panning needed)
reassign 509699 xserver-xorg-core
tags 509699 +fixed-upstream
thank you
Scott Anderson wrote:
> Okay, the panning feature is coming later then? What is the timeline for
> Xserver 1.6?
>
It was supposed to happen these
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 509699 want a large Virtual Desktop (RandR 1.3 panning needed)
Bug#509699: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Cannot oversize GNOME desktop using
Virtual in Xorg 7.3
Changed Bug title to `want a large Virtual Desktop (RandR 1.3 panning needed)'
f
--- On Mon, 1/5/09, Brice Goglin wrote:
> From: Brice Goglin
> Subject: Re: Bug#509699: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Cannot oversize GNOME
> desktop using Virtual in Xorg 7.3
> To: ee_in...@yahoo.com, 509...@bugs.debian.org
> Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 4:06 PM
> Scott Anderson wrote:
> > I'm a
Scott Anderson wrote:
> I'm assuming the Virtual line is being ignored because the setting does not
> seem to take effect. Do I need to tell GNOME the desktop is bigger too?
>
> % xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1440 x 900, maximum 2048 x 2048
> VGA disconnected (normal left inverte
--- On Wed, 12/24/08, Brice Goglin wrote:
> From: Brice Goglin
> Scott Anderson wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to oversize my GNOME desktop on my Dell
> d630 laptop by
> > using the Virtual parameter. I want a 3200x1600
> desktop, but all I
> > get is the physical size of my LCD monitor (1440x900).
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10~git+20090105+7dc567d-1.diff.gz
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10~git+20090105+7dc567d-1.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10~git+20090105+7dc567d-1.dsc
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-0.0.10-git+20090105+7dc567d-1' created by Chris
Lamb at 2009-01-05 20:08 +
Uploading xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (0.0.10-git+20090105+7dc567d-1) to
experimental.
Changes since xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-0.0.10-git+20081028+cea05e1-1:
Ben
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10~git+20090105+7dc567d-1_amd64.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10~git+20090105+7dc567d-1.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10~git+20090105+7dc567d.orig.tar.gz
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:02:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510030: fixed in xterm 235-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #510030,
regarding [CVE-2008-2383] xterm: DECRQSS and comments
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Mapping testing-security to testing-proposed-updates.
Warning: ignoring xterm_235.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive.
Accepted:
xterm_235-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_235-2.diff.gz
xterm_235-2.dsc
to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_235-2.dsc
xterm_235-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xt
xterm_235-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xterm_235-2.dsc
xterm_235.orig.tar.gz
xterm_235-2.diff.gz
xterm_235-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
xterm_235-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
xterm_235-2.dsc
xterm_235.orig.tar.gz
xterm_235-2.diff.gz
xterm_235-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
As the experimental version needs so many changes, how about the
attached patch to fix the issue for lenny?
It modifies nothing but adds another RADEON_CLOCK_CNTL_INDEX to 0
setting, like it is already there for CHIP_FAMILY_RV410, just more
limited (not within RADEONRestoreLVDSRegisters but only a
13 matches
Mail list logo
