Brice Goglin wrote:
xrandr tells that max screen size is 1024x1024, which is false. Is
there a way to tell the correct panel dimensions manually (versus DDC
auto detection)?
Add
Virtual 2048 2048
to the Subsection "Display" in xorg.conf. But I don't think it will help
here.
With the new d
Brice Goglin wrote:
Sergey Yanovich wrote:
video-intel seems to reject this mode (exceeds panel dimensions).
I can't find the corresponding code in the intel driver. Could you send
the Xorg.0.log of this test?
xrandr tells that max screen size is 1024x1024, which is false. Is
there a way to
> NoDDC set to true or false has no effect. The monitor is powered off
> with all combination of this option with either or both of the PanelSize
> and MonitorLayout commented out.
>
> NoDDC set to true or false with both PanelSize and MonitorLayout
> enabled result in a working monitor.
>
Hi
reassign 430545 xresprobe
retitle 430545 xresprobe breaks display at the middle of installation
thank you
nirupama rout wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have attached the text file for the output that i
> got for
>
> /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg/script 3>&1
>
> This is not problem with one kind of PC and I have
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 430545 xresprobe
Bug#430545: Display goes off at the mid of installation
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-core' to `xresprobe'.
> retitle 430545 xresprobe breaks display at the middle of installation
Bug#430545: Display goes off at th
Tim Hull wrote:
> Package: compiz
> Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
> Priority: important
>
> On Debian sid with the latest Compiz and X installed, running compiz
> --replace with an active Gnome/Metacity session results in there being
> no window borders. Compiz effects (cube, window effects, alt+tab,
> et
Package: compiz
Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
Priority: important
On Debian sid with the latest Compiz and X installed, running compiz
--replace with an active Gnome/Metacity session results in there being no
window borders. Compiz effects (cube, window effects, alt+tab, etc) all
work, but none of my win
Tag 'pixman-0.9.4-1' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-08-10
02:22 +
Tagging upload of pixman-0.9.4-1 to experimental.
Changes since pixman-0.9.3-git20070729-1:
Aaron Plattner (1):
Return a bool from pixman_image_unref.
David Nusinow (10):
Merge branch 'upstre
debian/changelog |5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 9ac13232d13a4d81460533eb95374dc36302c607
Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Aug 9 22:17:15 2007 -0400
Bump package version down to released version
Also note that we
debian/changelog | 17 +
debian/rules |4 ++--
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit e4437a61f27cbea4f02ad7c4ec47b2b6ef4f8983
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Aug 10 03:07:44 2007 +0200
Cosmetic fix in debian/cha
Makefile.am|4
Makefile.in| 148 +--
aclocal.m4 | 174 ++-
configure | 224 -
configure.ac | 45 +
Makefile.am |4 ++--
configure.ac | 45 +++--
pixman-1.pc.in| 11 +++
pixman.pc.in | 11 ---
pixman/Makefile.am| 11 ++-
pixman/pixman-image.c |7 ++-
pixman/pixman.h |
I guess I was wrong - it just happened without composite. So I guess it's
completely random, other than the fact that it freezes/reboots at random
times when:
* I switch from X to console
* I suspend/resume the machine
* I kill the X server (Ctrl-Alt-Backspace)
with the new modesetting "intel" d
Subject: xkb-data: not all Romanian layouts are present/advertised
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.9-4.1 1.0~cvs.20070721-1
Severity: important
Tags: l10n patch
Hello,
The GNOME layout selection tool does not allow selection of all the
existing layout for Romanian. To make matters worse, the hidden
Actually, I don't think it happens at all - at least I can't reproduce it as
of now without composite. So this seems to be an issue between composite
(and/or additional settings needed to get it working) and the new
mode-setting driver (it didn't happen w/i810+915resolution).
On 8/9/07, Brice Gog
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 23:03:49 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
[...]
> Does it say anything about Option PreferredMode? (hint: sending the log
> with Option "ModeDebug" "yes" might be good)
Here is the log withoug ModeDebug.
Regards,
Tino
Xorg.0.log.old
Description: application/trash
Your message dated Thu, 9 Aug 2007 23:19:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431428: xserver-xorg-core: server crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 9 Aug 2007 23:19:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431428: xserver-xorg-core: server crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 9 Aug 2007 23:19:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431428: xserver-xorg-core: server crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 9 Aug 2007 23:13:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430948: Crashes Xorg with signal 11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 9 Aug 2007 23:13:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430948: Crashes Xorg with signal 11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Tim Hull wrote:
> I must note that I do have the "composite" extension enabled. If I
> disable composite, I see these issues occur much less frequetly.
>
Less frequency or not at all?
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 22:27:14 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:18:50PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 20:27:01 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>>
Tino Keitel wrote:
> after upgrading to 2:2
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 22:27:14 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:18:50PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 20:27:01 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > > Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > > after upgrading to 2:2.0.0-1, the Xserver starts with 1280x1024.
> > > >
> >
I must note that I do have the "composite" extension enabled. If I disable
composite, I see these issues occur much less frequetly.
On 7/27/07, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 23:27:51 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
>
> > When using the new "intel" video driver that
Thank you.
I will try that when I can use the other computer, maybe this weekend.
With this option, do things like compiz-fusion or transparencies in KDE work
as well?
On 09/08/07, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:45:57AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On M
David wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I will try that when I can use the other computer, maybe this weekend.
>
> With this option, do things like compiz-fusion or transparencies in
> KDE work as well?
EXA was designed towards compositing, so it should actually be better
than XAA for compiz and transparenc
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:18:50PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 20:27:01 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > after upgrading to 2:2.0.0-1, the Xserver starts with 1280x1024.
> > >
> >
> > Could you send the output of xrandr --verbose so that we see whe
Sergey Yanovich wrote:
> video-intel seems to reject this mode (exceeds panel dimensions).
I can't find the corresponding code in the intel driver. Could you send
the Xorg.0.log of this test?
> xrandr tells that max screen size is 1024x1024, which is false. Is
> there a way to tell the correct pa
On Thu, Aug 2, 2007 at 00:43:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'd also like to get mesa 7.0.1 in sid, which requires an update to
> xorg-server. Brian plans to release 7.0.1 on friday, and I have the
> changes to xorg-server ready on a local branch, so hopefully I'll also
> do it next week.
>
Your message dated Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433131: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Accepted:
xdmx-tools_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.deb
xdmx_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.deb
xnest_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.deb
xorg-se
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12.dsc
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12.diff.gz
xprint-common_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_all.deb
xserver-xorg-core_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-dev_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12_i386.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libgl1-mesa-dri_7.0.1-1_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
Accepted:
libgl1-mesa-dev_7.0.1-1_all.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dev_7.0.1-1_all.deb
libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg_7.0.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg_7.0.1-1_i386.deb
libgl1-mesa-dri_7.0.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dri_7.0.1-1_i386.deb
libgl1-mesa-glx-db
mesa_7.0.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mesa_7.0.1-1.dsc
mesa_7.0.1.orig.tar.gz
mesa_7.0.1-1.diff.gz
libgl1-mesa-dev_7.0.1-1_all.deb
mesa-common-dev_7.0.1-1_all.deb
mesa-swx11-source_7.0.1-1_all.deb
libgl1-mesa-swx11_7.0.1-1_i386.deb
libgl1
Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.3.0.0.dfsg-12' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at 2007-08-09 18:41 +
Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 to unstable.
Changes since xorg-server-2_1.3.0.0.dfsg-11:
Brice Goglin (3):
Add 51_xkb-and-loathing.diff to fix a hang in OpenOffice.o
Your message dated Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:39:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434028: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Ignores
Screen/Display/Modes configuration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Olivier Lecarme wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.6.3-2
> Severity: important
>
> I'm using Gimp 2.3 on two different computers, both with the same Debian Sid
> system.
>
> One has an ATI RV370 X300SE video card and a Dell1280x1024 screen.
>
> The other has an ATI RV100 7000
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
mesa_7.0.1-1.diff.gz
mesa_7.0.1-1.dsc
mesa_7.0.1.orig.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:26:00, th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 436923 xkb-data
Bug#436923: Compose file problem with some Greek accents
Bug reassigned from package `xlibs-data' to `xkb-data'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Tag 'mesa-7.0.1-1' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-08-09
17:41 +
Tagging upload of mesa 7.0.1-1 to unstable.
Changes since mesa-7.0.1-rc2-1:
Brian (24):
minor tweaks
fix bug 11754
dlist polygon stipple fix from trunk
_mesa_pack_bitmap() fix from
GL/Makefile.in |1
GL/glx/Makefile.in |1
GL/mesa/Makefile.in | 11
GL/mesa/X/Makefile.in | 20
GL/mes
Gal Gur-Arie wrote:
> Thanks. building the module is really easy & quick.
> I've compiled it and copied it to: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/
>
> I've restarted the gdm - it didn't solve the problem.
>
> I guess it is problem of the driver developer and not Debian package -
> am I right?
Yes. We n
Your message dated Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:40:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430885: xserver-xorg-video-intel: new intel driver doesn't
support all modes of i810 driver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:15:53PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Get a modeline with:
> $ gtf 1280 1024 75
> # 1280x1024 @ 75.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 80.17 kHz; pclk: 138.54 MHz
> Modeline "1280x1024_75.00" 138.54 1280 1368 1504 1728 1024 1025
> 1028 1069 -HSync +Vsync
>
> And then add the las
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> clone 430885 -1
Bug#430885: xserver-xorg-video-intel: new intel driver doesn't support all
modes of i810 driver
Bug 430885 cloned as bug 436942.
> submitter -1 "Gal Gur-Arie" <[EMAI
Itai Seggev wrote:
> From a subsequent email in this thread, I figured out that I need to
> add --output VGA to the command line. Once I did this, I was able to
> set the resolution to my desired resolution. It still seems to be a
> bug that before the upgrade in respected my preferences in xorg.co
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:30:11AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > I didn't know about
> > xrandr and using it to resize. When I tried the command above
> > involving --mode, I got a usage message but that's it.
>
> You need to upgrade xbase-clients to 7.2 (in testing).
>From a subsequent email i
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:30:11AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Itai Seggev wrote:
> > The output to the first two commands is below.
>
> Did you forget to paste it ?
*sigh* That's what I get for sending email at 1am. It's at the end of
the email.
> > I didn't know about
> > xrandr and using i
Package: xlibs-data
Version: 1:7.2-5
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
This problem is recent, but I do not know when it started. The Compose file
(/usr/share/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose) now has wrong definitions for
the Greek DASIA and PSILI symbols. So for instance when the keyboard is
switched t
On 8/9/07, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gal Gur-Arie wrote:
> >1280x768 60.0*
>
> Ok there is no preferred mode at all, it probably explains why you don't
> get 1280x1024 by default and why you need to choose a PreferredMode in
> xorg.conf or run xrandr --output VGA --mode
Gal Gur-Arie wrote:
>1280x768 60.0*
Ok there is no preferred mode at all, it probably explains why you don't
get 1280x1024 by default and why you need to choose a PreferredMode in
xorg.conf or run xrandr --output VGA --mode 1280x1024 after starting X.
It's not clear there is something be
Here is the output of xrandr:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 768, maximum 1920 x 1920
VGA connected 1280x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right) 0mm x 0mm
1792x1344 60.0
1920x1200 60.0
1600x1200 65.0 60.0
1680x1050 60.0
1600x1024 60.0
1400x10
Gal Gur-Arie wrote:
> My monitor can only support up to 80 on this resolution.
Oops, sorry, I read the wrong number in the xrandr output. It reports 60
ou 75Hz, so that's correct.
> The xrandr output is before I've tried the preferred mode.
> Do you also need the output after I'm defining Option
My monitor can only support up to 80 on this resolution.
The xrandr output is before I've tried the preferred mode.
Do you also need the output after I'm defining Option "PreferredMode"
"1280x1024_75.00" ?
If there is a border related problem - I have no problem to install an
updated version from
Gal Gur-Arie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using 1280x1024 resolution and trying to use it on version: 2.1.0-2
>
> I've re-installed: xserver-xorg-video-intel version: 2.1.0-2
> xrandr --output VGA --mode 1280x1024
> Show it kind'a distorted, but it shows in 1280x1024 resolution.
Good to know, so your m
Joachim Breitner wrote:
>> Since you seem to have an AGP board, you might want to try adding
>> Option "BusType" "PCI"
>> to the Device section of your xorg.conf. It will make X use a regular
>> PCI mode and thus might workaround some broken AGP bridges.
>>
>
> This will also degrade perf
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.08.2007, 11:46 +0200 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:19:37PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Bad news. I just ran google earth and shortly after, while doing some
> > aggressive window-swapping, it crashed with the usual symptoms. Note
> > that while
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:19:37PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Bad news. I just ran google earth and shortly after, while doing some
> aggressive window-swapping, it crashed with the usual symptoms. Note
> that while switching, metacity draws white borders around windows using
> probably the s
Gal Gur-Arie wrote:
> Hello Brice,
>
> As I've mentioned on my previous mail (July 1, 2007 ) - I'm also
> having this problem.
> using the preferred mode didn't really helped and I'm currently
> returned to the 1.7.2-4 version of xserver-xorg-video-i810 from Etch,
> which is working great as it use
Hello Brice,
As I've mentioned on my previous mail (July 1, 2007 ) - I'm also having this
problem.
using the preferred mode didn't really helped and I'm currently returned to
the 1.7.2-4 version of xserver-xorg-video-i810 from Etch, which is working
great as it used to be.
Please let me know how
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 433035 + pending
Bug#433035: xserver-xorg should recommend libgl1-mesa-dri
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:56:23 +0200
Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clayton wrote:
> > Hi Brice,
> >
> > I am pretty sure that each time I moved from one version of xorg to
> > another (snapshot.debian.net/archive/2007/03/08/debian/ <--> testing
> > <--> unstable) *all* the xorg modules c
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:45:57AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:56 +0100, David wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, with the version from experimental that was released before
> > one week ago, only mplayer works in a 3D acceleration environment.
> >
> > Either if I use Beryl, or if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 433035 xserver-xorg
Bug#433035: xserver-xorg-core: Extremely slow with chromium; crashes on exit
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-core' to `xserver-xorg'.
> retitle 433035 xserver-xorg should recommend libgl1-mesa-dri
Bug#433035: xser
reassign 433035 xserver-xorg
retitle 433035 xserver-xorg should recommend libgl1-mesa-dri
thank you
Frans Pop wrote:
> Leaving the report open for two issues:
> - the X server should not crash if an optional lib is missing (known issue
> I understand)
>
Yes, known as #428707 for instance
Marcus Better wrote:
> Package: compiz-kde
> Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
> Severity: normal
>
> kde-window-decorator segfaulted after running for some hours.
>
I talked to some KDE guys, it's not clear whether the bug is in
kde-window-decorator or in a KDE/QT lib. The same backtrace has been
reported
68 matches
Mail list logo
