Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 324560 linux-2.6
Bug#324560: Not 64-bit clean?
Bug reassigned from package `libdrm' to `linux-2.6'.
> tags 324560 upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#324560: Not 64-bit clean?
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream
> kthxbye
Stoppin
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:02:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370141: X crashing on PCI-e 7900GTX
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370167: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419533: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372519: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408817: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365430: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#243288: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322284: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396958: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322284: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426978: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427180: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405739: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322284: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
xlibmesa-dri_7.2-4_all.deb: package says section is libs, override says x11.
xlibs-static-dev_7.2-4_all.deb: package says section is libs, override says
libdevel.
Either the package or th
Accepted:
libglu1-xorg-dev_7.2-4_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg/libglu1-xorg-dev_7.2-4_all.deb
libglu1-xorg_7.2-4_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg/libglu1-xorg_7.2-4_all.deb
x-window-system-core_7.2-4_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg/x-window-system-core_7.2-4_all.deb
x-window-system_7.2-4_all.deb
to p
Tag 'xorg-1_7.2-4' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-06-12
03:00 +
Tagging upload of xorg-1_7.2-4 to unstable.
Changes since xorg-1_7.2-3-17:
---
0 files changed
---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
debian/changelog |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 96e1fa86b04f559fbc2463036553e6a3fd61d012
Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Jun 11 23:00:22 2007 -0400
Prepare changelog for upload
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/cha
debian/changelog | 22 +-
debian/local/dexconf |7 ++-
debian/xserver-xorg.templates |1 -
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 05ac83fd64ccd4af493c787fbfa98306f123
Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED
xorg_7.2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg_7.2-4.dsc
xorg_7.2-4.tar.gz
xserver-xorg_7.2-4_all.deb
xserver-xfree86_7.2-4_all.deb
xorg_7.2-4_all.deb
xorg-dev_7.2-4_all.deb
xlibs-data_7.2-4_all.deb
xlibs-static-dev_7.2-4_all.deb
xlibmesa-dri
debian/changelog | 21 -
debian/local/dexconf |7 ++-
debian/xserver-xorg.templates |3 +--
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 0a5113f2c743c1955b39b2326b3663ebca97fbcc
Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 11 Jun 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Did you have a chance to test xserver-xorg-video-nv 2.0.2?
I did, and it works. I ended up removing all of the
proprietary nvidia packages and reconfiguring the xserver-xorg
package to create a new xorg.conf from scratch, otherwise I was
getting video
FYI: The status of the xorg-docs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.2+git20061105-3
Current version: 1:1.4-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more inf
FYI: The status of the xorg-sgml-doctools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.1+git20061105-1
Current version: 1:1.2-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for
FYI: The status of the xfonts-encodings source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.0.0-6
Current version: 1:1.0.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> forwarded 428089 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237
Bug#428089: xserver-xorg-video-savage: consoles black or corrupted after X
shutdown
Noted your statement that Bug
I have filed this upstream at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:22:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377165: xserver-xorg: X reports duplicate keycodes for
some keys
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:19:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428109: makes e. g. supertux slow, quiting crashes X
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> forwarded 345537 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5140
Bug#345537: xserver-xorg: stopping acpid makes Xorg go crazy
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
ht
Hi Mark,
Did you have a chance to test xserver-xorg-video-nv 2.0.2?
thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:44:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:44:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:46:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395213: xserver-xorg-video-nv: Display bug in Firefox text
entry boxes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:46:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395213: xserver-xorg-video-nv: Display bug in Firefox text
entry boxes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:44:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:44:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:44:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:34AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Also, you could try the new libx11* packages currently in experimental
> (2:1.1.1-1 instead the 2:1.1-2 you had when reporting this bug) in case
> something got fixed.
Even better, please try 2:1.1.2-1, which fixes an event-handling s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 415541 libx11-6
Bug#415541: libx11-6: 1.1.1-1 causes complete screen lockup / freeze from xmms
Bug reassigned from package `xmms' to `libx11-6'.
> found 415541 2:1.1.1-1
Bug#415541: libx11-6: 1.1.1-1 causes complete screen lockup / freeze from
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:34:49PM +0900, Gin wrote:
> libX11 has bug in function XFilterEvent.
> It cannot hadle thread when XIM is using.
Josh Triplett and I recreated part of the fix you cite recently because
Xlib/XCB reveals the same problem, even for single-threaded apps.
However, we weren't
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:40:34 -0700, Jeremy Brand wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 1:7.1.0-16
>
>
> IIRC 'xv' has been gone from debian since woody, or maybe even
> potato. In general, I think it would be nice if
> dependencies/conflicts were related only to stable and oldstable.
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.1.0-16
IIRC 'xv' has been gone from debian since woody, or maybe even
potato. In general, I think it would be nice if
dependencies/conflicts were related only to stable and oldstable.
Someone upgrading from potato, should probably upgrade to woody
before upg
reopen 428388
severity 428388 wishlist
retitle 428388 gaim-irchelper should become dummy package
thanks
In that case, gaim-irchelper should become a dummy package to smooth the
upgrade path.
--Ken
--
Ken Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Ill
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 428388
Bug#428388: xserver-xorg: OpenOffice regularly crashes X, rendering the system
unusable
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> severity 428388 wishlist
Bug#428388: xserver-xorg: OpenOffice regularly crashes X, rendering the system
unusab
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 428388 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10525
Bug#428388: xserver-xorg: OpenOffice regularly crashes X, rendering the system
unusable
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?i
forwarded 428388 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10525
kthxbye
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 11:52 +0100, Mike Brodbelt wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.2-3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> I regularly have problems with X crashing hard, locking up the entire
> display. When this occur
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.2-3
Severity: normal
I regularly have problems with X crashing hard, locking up the entire
display. When this occurs, the moue pointer still reposnds, but all
other input is ignored, animated screen elements freeze, and mousing to
alternate desktops becomes impo
49 matches
Mail list logo
