On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:37:55PM +, David Nusinow wrote:
> Now with the modular tree, I'm willing to keep it all in the repo,
> depending on how things go. If git really does help us to push changes
> upstream, and I'm able to do this frequently and keep our patch number
> down, stopping quil
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4.orig.tar.gz
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debi
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-i810/xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-i810/xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.6.4-1_i386.deb
to
pool/ma
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-08-09 23:22:41 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2765
Added:
tags/util/xutils-dev/xutils-dev-1:7.1.ds-2/
Log:
Tag upload of xutils-dev-1:7.1.ds-2 to unstable
Copied: tags/util/xutils-dev/xutils-dev-1:7.1.ds-2 (from rev 2764,
branches/7.1/util/xutils-dev)
--
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-08-09 23:21:52 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2764
Added:
tags/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/xserver-xorg-video-i810-2:1.6.4-1/
Log:
Tag upload of xserver-xorg-video-i810-2:1.6.4-1 to experimental
Copied: tags/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/xserver-xorg-vi
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:17:06AM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
>
> Accepted:
> libxaw-headers_1.0.2-2_all.deb
> to pool/main/libx/libxaw/libxaw-headers_1.0.2-2_all.deb
> libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
> to pool/main/libx/libxaw/libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
> libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
> t
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-08-09 23:05:08 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2763
Modified:
branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/debian/changelog
Log:
* New upstream release
Modified: branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/debian/changelog
=
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-08-09 22:36:30 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2762
Added:
branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/src/brw_defines.h
branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/src/brw_structs.h
branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/src/wm_prog.h
Modified:
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-08-09 22:33:48 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2761
Added:
vendor/X11R7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/src/brw_defines.h
vendor/X11R7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/src/brw_structs.h
vendor/X11R7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/src/wm_prog.h
Modifie
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-08-09 21:48:54 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2760
Modified:
branches/7.1/util/xutils-dev/debian/changelog
Log:
* Upload to unstable
Modified: branches/7.1/util/xutils-dev/debian/changelog
===
-
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 06:06:15PM -0700, Jeff Carr wrote:
> I've not gotten 3D acceleration doesn't work on my 945G/GZ (8086:2772)
> after re-installing RHEL4 with Debian sid. Over the last few weeks I
> think I've tracked it down to a old version of mesa.
Yes, you need the version of mesa in exp
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:50:55AM +0200, Christan Chiesa wrote:
> hello,
>
> OK, first of all i introduce myself as no one know me and i never did
> something for X :). I'm Christian, I'm not a Debian Developer but, for
> the moment, I'm the maintainer of some packages (all packages
> maintained
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:53:13AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Oh, if you're committing it anyway, then that works too, but if you have
> it in git, then given that all you need is 'git push origin' (to push
> everything), or whatever, then the barrier to entry for you is lowered a
> great deal, a
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:29:06PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> I use patch systems for some of my own packages, so am not against their
> use, but we must realize that external people have valid arguments
> against this use.
That's fair. I acknowledge that, and I admit that quilt isn't the be-al
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:34:39PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:53:13AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> [...]
> > > Yeah, getting all our patches merged upstream is of course a goal of mine,
> > > so this is heartening. Just out of curiosity, how would git be more
> > > he
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:30:14PM +, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 07:04:28PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
[...]
> > Like you, I tend to feel keeping explicitly separate patches makes for
> > a cleaner solution when dealing with upstream source the size of
> > X.org. Otherwise
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:30:12PM +0200, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 210-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I wish there was a way to make xterm scrollbars look and act just like
> emacs-snapshot, rxvt, and firefox scrollbars -- a slider movable with
> the left mouse button.
There al
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:53:13AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
[...]
> > Yeah, getting all our patches merged upstream is of course a goal of mine,
> > so this is heartening. Just out of curiosity, how would git be more helpful
> > than producing a diff and applying it to the upstream tree, followed
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 20:28 +0300, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > With the mga driver, it may be because it hasn't adapted to changes in
> > the XAA RENDER acceleration interface, so RENDER isn't currently
> > accelerated with it.
>
> I'm 100% sure that there was no problem with 6.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package xcursor-themes
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xcursor-themes
> severity 382032 important
Bug#382032: shouldn't this be severity grave?
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
> merge 382032 368942
Bug#368942: xcursor-themes overwrites conffi
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> With the mga driver, it may be because it hasn't adapted to changes in
> the XAA RENDER acceleration interface, so RENDER isn't currently
> accelerated with it.
I'm 100% sure that there was no problem with 6.8 with mga. It appeared
with 6.9.
> The radeon driver has adapted
Accepted:
libxi-dev_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxi/libxi-dev_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
libxi6-dbg_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxi/libxi6-dbg_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
libxi6_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxi/libxi6_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
libxi_1.0.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/libx/libxi/libx
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libxi-dev_1.0.1-1_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says libdevel.
libxi6-dbg_1.0.1-1_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says
libdevel.
libxi6-dbg_1.0.1-1_i386.d
libxi_1.0.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libxi_1.0.1-1.dsc
libxi_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
libxi_1.0.1-1.diff.gz
libxi6_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
libxi6-dbg_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
libxi-dev_1.0.1-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUB
Package: xterm
Version: 210-3
Severity: wishlist
I wish there was a way to make xterm scrollbars look and act just like
emacs-snapshot, rxvt, and firefox scrollbars -- a slider movable with
the left mouse button.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-08-09 13:03:00 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2759
Removed:
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/debian/patches/01_manpage_location.diff
Modified:
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/debian/changelog
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/debian/control
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/debian/libxi-dev
Hi Colin,
it's not sufficient to just update the section entries in the .man
files, you also need to get the value of LIB_MAN_SUFFIX used in
man/Makefile.am updated, otherwise the man-links such as
XChangeDeviceControl point to .3x instead of .3, and they will therefore
fail (dh_installman will co
libxaw_1.0.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libxaw_1.0.2-2.dsc
libxaw_1.0.2-2.diff.gz
libxaw6_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
libxaw7_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
libxaw7-dbg_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
libxaw7-dev_1.0.2-2
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-2_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says
libdevel.
libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-2_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-
Accepted:
libxaw-headers_1.0.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxaw/libxaw-headers_1.0.2-2_all.deb
libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxaw/libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxaw/libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
libxaw6_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
to
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-08-09 10:58:31 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2758
Added:
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/debian/libxaw7-dev.manpages
Modified:
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/debian/changelog
Log:
Add libxaw7-dev.manpages to get the man page installed.
Modified: branches/7.1/lib/libxa
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-08-09 10:19:26 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2757
Modified:
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/COPYING
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/ChangeLog
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/INSTALL
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/Makefile.am
branches/7.1/lib/libxi/Makefile.in
branches/7.1/lib/l
libxaw_1.0.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libxaw_1.0.2-1.dsc
libxaw_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
libxaw_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
libxaw6_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
libxaw7_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
libxaw7-dbg_1.0.2-1_i38
You closed this as a user config issue, but it appears to be a known
upstream issue with xpdf which is still open (maybe the user config soln
is a work around?):
quoting from:
http://zinser.no-ip.info/vms/sw/notes/xpdf.htmlx
quote**
Currently open issues
T
Accepted:
libxaw-headers_1.0.2-1_all.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxaw/libxaw-headers_1.0.2-1_all.deb
libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxaw/libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxaw/libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
libxaw6_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-1_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says
libdevel.
libxaw6-dbg_1.0.2-1_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
libxaw6-dev_1.0.2-
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-08-09 08:48:59 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2756
Removed:
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/debian/libxaw6.links
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/debian/libxaw7.links
Modified:
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/debian/changelog
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/debian/compat
branches
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-08-09 07:54:53 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2755
Modified:
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/ChangeLog
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/Makefile.am
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/Makefile.in
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/aclocal.m4
branches/7.1/lib/libxaw/compile
branches/7
hello,
OK, first of all i introduce myself as no one know me and i never did
something for X :). I'm Christian, I'm not a Debian Developer but, for
the moment, I'm the maintainer of some packages (all packages
maintained by Riccardo Setti, he's busy at the moment) and I'm
interested in X :)
I us
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:12:42AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I think I'm becoming a relatively experienced git user, but I
> have very little experience with administration of a shared repository.
> We'd probably need an actual guru like Keith Packard for that, at least
> initially until we've
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 19:36 +, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:14:33PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 15:40 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > If the eventual goal is to get all the patches merged upstream -- and I
> > > really hope it is -- then tr
reassign 381978 meta-gnome2 1:2.14.2
close 381978 1:2.14.2.1
stop
Reassigning #381978 to meta-gnome2, this will be fixed when meta-gnome2
enters testing.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry, my mistake.
Yes it is working when using XkbModel pc102 or pc105.
Thanks for the reply.
Janari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 03:00:39PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Just thought I should let the X team know, that although the i810 driver
> > in experimental fixes the ValidatePci() bug (see #345914, etc.), now it
> > has problems terminating
>
> To get full support for the new i810 versions you
44 matches
Mail list logo
