it seems related
Cheers
Krisztian Mark Szentes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi sharon furlonge,
Everything has been prepared and is ready to go.
Check here : requestedasap.com
Regards,
Joanna
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem can be caused by upgrading the kdm package. See bug #290625.
Cheers
Krisztian Mark Szentes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:03:57PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> I'll probably go with this last option (xorg-debian) since it seems to
^^^
Actually, let's go with xorg-distro. That way distros deriving from us
won't feel the need to change the name
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:11:14PM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El martes, 20 de diciembre de 2005 18:57, Michel Dänzer escribió:
> > > Then we will start to receive bug reports by users without the right
> > > driver, isn't it? Probably a massive drivers-all metapackage will be a
> > >
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 06:57:25PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Why only mid-term? Something like xserver-xorg depending on
> xorg-video-drivers | xorg-video-driver (with every video driver package
> providing xorg-video-driver and xorg-video-drivers being the metapackage
> depending on all of the
El martes, 20 de diciembre de 2005 18:57, Michel Dänzer escribió:
> > Then we will start to receive bug reports by users without the right
> > driver, isn't it? Probably a massive drivers-all metapackage will be a
> > mid-term solution...
>
> Why only mid-term? Something like xserver-xorg depen
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 18:22 +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El martes, 20 de diciembre de 2005 17:23, David Nusinow escribió:
> > > On the other hand, I understand that this heavy separation leads to
> > > individual per-driver packages, doesn't it?
> >
> > Yeah, it does. The problem is obv
El martes, 20 de diciembre de 2005 17:23, David Nusinow escribió:
> > On the other hand, I understand that this heavy separation leads to
> > individual per-driver packages, doesn't it?
>
> Yeah, it does. The problem is obviously a lot more labor at this stage, but
> the benefit is that we can
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:25:59AM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Martes, 20 de Diciembre de 2005 04:50, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
> escribió:
> > Author: dnusinow
> > Date: 2005-12-19 22:49:49 -0500 (Mon, 19 Dec 2005)
> > New Revision: 956
> >
> > Added:
> >branches/modula
El Martes, 20 de Diciembre de 2005 04:50, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
escribió:
> Author: dnusinow
> Date: 2005-12-19 22:49:49 -0500 (Mon, 19 Dec 2005)
> New Revision: 956
>
> Added:
>branches/modular/driver/xf86-video-ati/ChangeLog
[...]
> Removed:
>branches/modular/driver/xf86-vi
El martes, 20 de diciembre de 2005 05:52, David Nusinow escribió:
> It's true. As of this moment, you should be able to build a set of Debian
> packages in a chroot and run the X server from those packages. Granted, you
> currently need an ati card to do this, but I'll work on the rest of the
> dri
Package: fontforge
Version: 0.0.20050911-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
As announced in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html, the
xlibs-dev package is scheduled for removal and X devel libraries will be
splitted in several packages.
Running the script proposed by
13 matches
Mail list logo
