Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r654 - trunk/debian

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:36:49PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > * Fix xserver-xorg debconfage issues with autodetection. If the user > chooses to autodetect values, the original values in the debconf > templates are reset to ensure that the autodetection works. Thanks Da

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r656 - branches/6.9/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-10-04 20:21:17 -0500 (Tue, 04 Oct 2005) New Revision: 656 Modified: branches/6.9/debian/TODO branches/6.9/debian/changelog branches/6.9/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in Log: Merge changes from trunk revision 651 to current HEAD (655) Modified: branches/6.9/debian

Processed: Re-opening

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 331697 Bug#331697: /usr/X11R6/bin/X: crash with blender Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r655 - trunk/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-10-04 19:39:14 -0500 (Tue, 04 Oct 2005) New Revision: 655 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in Log: * Ensure that all templates containing the name "autodetect" are reset in the auto_answer function Modified: trunk/debian/change

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r654 - trunk/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-10-04 18:36:42 -0500 (Tue, 04 Oct 2005) New Revision: 654 Modified: trunk/debian/TODO trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in Log: * Fix xserver-xorg debconfage issues with autodetection. If the user chooses to autodetect values, the origin

Re: Input hotplugging et al (was: Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r640 - trunk/debian)

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:42:32PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:07:05PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > I'd like to kill it one day, but not today. All the options out there are > > pretty crap, so we only lose so much by keeping it around for now. Once I > > get Debian c

Re: xorg-x11/experimental sparc FTBFS

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:47:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > I tried building xorg-x11_6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 on sparc, but it > failed in xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/dri/ffb. > Build log is available at > . Thanks

Bug#331697: Bug still present in all-experimental

I spoke too fast. After playing longer witrh experimental, the bug is still there: Backtrace: 0: /usr/X11R6/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x80) [0x8088b60] 1: [0xe500] 2: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so [0x55752c9b] 3: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so(_swrast_DrawPixels+0x

Bug#331697: NOTABUG ?

Sorry for the report. It seems the problem occured because I had Xorg from experimental and xlibmesa-gl from unstable. I upgraded everything from experimental and it seems it doesn't segfault anymore. Xav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r653 - trunk/debian

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:00:11PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El martes, 4 de octubre de 2005 19:46, David Nusinow escribió: > > I'm going to send out one big mail to -devel-announce some point in the > > near future. Let's wait for that. The mail will mainly be targeted at > > getting p

Bug#213286: [L]-[e]-[v]-[i]-[t]-[r]-[a] avalable

"Michael Dunlap" was looking for a supplier for [B]-est [M]-[e]ds] [C]-[i]-[a]-[l]-[i]-[s] [V]-[i]-[a]-[g]-[r]-[a] No> Pres-[c]-[r]-[i]-[p]-[t]-ion No Pres-[c]-[r]-[i]-[p]-[t]-ion http://anilineymkv7gu9dtd9d4c807p08sp0c7p7.japingfg.com/?qhtk }R-e-m-ov[a]-[l] http://xbkyvhfzdh8gumbbmuetmybbb.

Bug#331435: xserver-xorg: Mouse pointer occasionally vanishes

Hi David David Martínez Moreno wrote: Have you tried to use nv driver instead of NVidia one? That could be the definite thing to know for assigning the bug to xserver-xorg or nvidia-driver. That was one of my thoughts today - although I've narrowed the problem down, and it only occurs after

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r653 - trunk/debian

El martes, 4 de octubre de 2005 19:46, David Nusinow escribió: > I'm going to send out one big mail to -devel-announce some point in the > near future. Let's wait for that. The mail will mainly be targeted at > getting people to move their build-deps away from xlibs-dev. The reason I > haven't sent

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r653 - trunk/debian

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:20:01PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El martes, 4 de octubre de 2005 18:03, David Nusinow escribió: > > > I suppose that we are holding new xterm till 6.9, aren't we? > > > > Yes. At this point I really just want to finish up 6.8 and be done with it. > > Fortun

Bug#331690: xserver-xorg: cat: /var/lib/xfree86/xorg.conf.md5sum: No such file or directory

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 File: /var/lib/xfree86/xorg.conf.md5sum Severity: important While upgrading from Sarge to current testing (Tue Oct 4 2005), installing the given version of the given package from scratch, Setting up xserver-xorg (6.8.2.dfsg.1-7) ... xserver-xorg

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r653 - trunk/debian

El martes, 4 de octubre de 2005 18:03, David Nusinow escribió: > > I suppose that we are holding new xterm till 6.9, aren't we? > > Yes. At this point I really just want to finish up 6.8 and be done with it. > Fortunately, we're *really* close to that now. 6.9 will require a bit of > grunt work

Re: Questions about "/usr/X11R6"

El lunes, 19 de septiembre de 2005 02:06, Franz Hose escribió: > After being a long time Debian user, then switched > to Gentoo for a couple of months, and now being > back to Debian, I noticed the following.. > > Gentoo documentation says "/usr/X11R6" is > deprecated in Xorg, and they're installin

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r653 - trunk/debian

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:52:02PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El Martes, 4 de Octubre de 2005 04:56, David Nusinow escribió: > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:50:24PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository > Admin wrote: > > > Author: dnusinow > > > Date: 2005-10-03 21:50:23 -0500 (Mon, 03 O

Bug#331435: xserver-xorg: Mouse pointer occasionally vanishes

El lunes, 3 de octubre de 2005 21:07, Peter Hicks escribió: > > Hello, Peter. Did the pointer disappear always in the same screen? > > I'm not sure, both times I'd walked away from the machine for a few > minutes. > > My laptop's single-headed, my desktop dual-headed with no common > hardware apart

Bug#328542: xserver-xorg: i925GM can't switch with Fn-F8 to projector

El lunes, 3 de octubre de 2005 19:46, Tom Epperly escribió: > Previous versions of xserver-xorg worked fine with my external LCD > display and external projectors. > > I am still unable to use the external monitor adaptor plug with the > 1600x1200 Dell LCD Display. Today, I tried attaching it to a

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r653 - trunk/debian

El Martes, 4 de Octubre de 2005 16:01, Thomas Dickey escribió: > David Martínez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Anyone else have any issues they really want to see go in to -8? > > > > I suppose that we are holding new xterm till 6.9, aren't we? > > I would have thought that splitting xt

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r653 - trunk/debian

David Martínez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyone else have any issues they really want to see go in to -8? > I suppose that we are holding new xterm till 6.9, aren't we? I would have thought that splitting xterm out would make it independent of the X server version. -- Thomas E.

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r640 - trunk/debian

On Tuesday 04 October 2005 14:05, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Not only is it illogical, it is also inconsistent with how debconf is > > used for most other packages. > > Most other packages don't need such a pathologically insane config > file. (Luckily.) True :-) pgp6Ydtrl66AJ.pgp Description: PGP

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r640 - trunk/debian

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:11:56PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 04 October 2005 04:56, Daniel Stone wrote: > > To be honest, I don't see the Debconf interface as being valuable. I > > don't think it provides anything over xorg.conf for the average user, > > since you're going to have to be

xorg-x11/experimental sparc FTBFS

Hi, I tried building xorg-x11_6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 on sparc, but it failed in xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/dri/ffb. Build log is available at . Cheers, Julien Cristau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r653 - trunk/debian

El Martes, 4 de Octubre de 2005 04:56, David Nusinow escribió: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:50:24PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > > Author: dnusinow > > Date: 2005-10-03 21:50:23 -0500 (Mon, 03 Oct 2005) > > New Revision: 653 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/debian/TODO > > Log

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r640 - trunk/debian

On Tuesday 04 October 2005 04:56, Daniel Stone wrote: > To be honest, I don't see the Debconf interface as being valuable. I > don't think it provides anything over xorg.conf for the average user, > since you're going to have to be googling it anyway, and ... yeah. I > just don't see why it would

Bug#24192: Norton SystemWorks 2005 Premier plus Internet Security 2005 - $39.95

Microsoft Autoroute 2005 DvD UK - $19.95 http://worm.okmac.com/ Here's a rule I recommend: Never practice two vices at once. A good friend of my son's is a son to me. I bought some powdered water yesterday. I don't know what to add. Do not speak quickly; it is a sign of insanity. Man i