Accepted:
lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
li
lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
(new) libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb extra libdevel
Distributed Multihead X client library (unstripped)
T
xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1.dsc
xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
pm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_all.deb
x-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi_6.8.2.dfsg.1-1_all.deb
x
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 02:51:21PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >Er, you don't get to choose. The DDX driver nominates which DRI module
> >to load, and libGL loads it. The only chance of confusion is people
> >upgrading xserver-xorg but not xlibmesa-dri, in which case yo
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-07-11 21:43:14 -0500 (Mon, 11 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 333
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
- Properly credit previous fix
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog 2005-
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-07-11 21:37:23 -0500 (Mon, 11 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 332
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/scripts/vars.s390
Log:
- Change XFREE86 -> XORG in debian/scripts/vars.s390 to fix FTBFS
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:18:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300974: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 07:55:20PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Author: dnusinow
> Date: 2005-07-11 19:55:12 -0500 (Mon, 11 Jul 2005)
> New Revision: 331
>
> Modified:
>trunk/debian/changelog
> Log:
> - Move fixes since -1 packages were built to -2. They'll be in that
>
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-07-11 19:55:12 -0500 (Mon, 11 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 331
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
- Move fixes since -1 packages were built to -2. They'll be in that
release.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
=
Daniel Stone wrote:
>Er, you don't get to choose. The DDX driver nominates which DRI module
>to load, and libGL loads it. The only chance of confusion is people
>upgrading xserver-xorg but not xlibmesa-dri, in which case you're going
>to get exactly what you deserve.
I was thinking of people sayi
NON E' ILLEGALE, E' SOLO UN GIOCO CHE FA GUADAGNARE SOLDI REALI E SICURI SOLO A
CHI PARTECIPA, QUI NESSUNO REGALA NIENTE, L' INVESTIMENTO E' DI SOLI 5
Leggiti attentamente questa notizia!
Magari nn ti cambierà la vita, ma io al momento che ti scrivo ci ho guadagnato
450 euro in 1 settimana!!!
I just committed the fix for #725 to X.Org HEAD. Apparently this
doesn't constitute 'fixed-upstream', so I'm going to leave manipulation
of the bug tags to someone who knwos this better than me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
$B(.(,(/(.(,(/(.(,(/(.(,(/(B
$B(-AG(-(-?M(-(-=P(-(-D%(-(B
$B(1(,(0(1(,(0(1(,(0(1(,(0(B
http://awg.webchu.com/?freehost
$B"(%[%9%HBgJg=8!J$*;n$740A4L5NAEPO?#O#K!*!K(B
$B"($9$Y$F%([EMAIL PROTECTED];W$$$r$7$F>.8/$$2T$.!*(B
$B"($*Ajn!&#S>n!&#M>n!&(B
$B%J!<%9!&%9%C%A!<$J$I(B
$B(.(,(/(.(,(
Title: UniCredit Banca - Home
Egregi clienti della banca UniCredit Banca via Internet Imprese, Vi informiamo che in relazione al sovraccarico
del
I forwarded this bug upstream to x.org, with patch, as
freedesktop.org bug number 3754.
--
Nathanael Nerode
Doom! Doom!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line too old and merged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I like the patch, and I would
No problem; it's perfectly understandable given that the audit was
still going on the first time around (and rightly took priority).
> like to roll it in to the first round of pac
Urgent Announcement:
Good Day, I have been instructed by my head office to alert you to the fact
that your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for
you to consider.
Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit
situation is not an issu
Urgent Announcement:
Good Day, I have been instructed by my head office to alert you to the fact
that your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for
you to consider.
Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit
situation is not an issu
The internets fasters way to order prescription medication
http://preferably.yourgoldenhealth.info/?pillagedxtvuyracialzgvreversals
If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.
Arbeit macht frei. (Work sets you free).
Kids: they dance before they learn there is
33 matches
Mail list logo
