David writ:
>
> It's up to you what to do with the monolithic tree, and for the modular
> tree I had assumed that xprint would be split off in to its own module like
> everything else, which you would then maintain. How's all this sound?
>
Yes, my basic assumption has been the same, that the xpri
Hey babie. It is of course Little J, from the online dating website. I've been
reading all about you and I just wanted to say hola. Come and check out my
website so you can see all about me and my pics too. I can't wait to hear from
you sexy. Take care, Sexy J
www.eeg.nononodoover.com/ju29/
_
Body Wrap at Home to lose 6-20 inches in one hour.
With Bodywrap we guarantee:
you'll lose 6-8 Inches in one hour
100% Satisfaction or your money back
Bodywrap is soothing formula that contours,
cleanses and rejuvenates your body while
reducing inches.
http://impeller.yourfitnessonl
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:47:53PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> now that you're working on getting x11-xorg into unstable, I'd like to
> check in with you what your plans for xprt are.
>
> I notice in svn you've still got xprt marked for build in x11-xorg,
> whereas we had it removed from xfree86.
Hi XSF,
now that you're working on getting x11-xorg into unstable, I'd like to
check in with you what your plans for xprt are.
I notice in svn you've still got xprt marked for build in x11-xorg,
whereas we had it removed from xfree86.
Will you want to do the same for now, removing it from x11-xo
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:37:50PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Author: dnusinow
> Date: 2005-06-06 20:37:48 -0500 (Mon, 06 Jun 2005)
> New Revision: 150
>
> Modified:
>trunk/debian/TODO
>trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
> Log:
> Fix thinko in 000_stol
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-06-06 20:37:48 -0500 (Mon, 06 Jun 2005)
New Revision: 150
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
Log:
Fix thinko in 000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff fix from svn revision 137.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
==
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:59:41PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> All we're really pressed to provide is an X server, so the library and
> application modularization isn't necessary today.
> As soon as the core server is modularized, transitioning individual
> drivers can be massively parallelized.
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 17:39 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:54:57PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Nusinow) writes:
> > > The modularization effort seems to be progressing,
> > > but if we can move to quilt rapidly then we'll be all the better for it
X went away again, but this time I was able to
check /var/log/XFree86.0.log.old.
No stack trace from xserver-xfree86-dbg!
So I checked /var/log/messages and found:
Jun 6 13:38:44 debian1 kernel: <5>__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation
failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jun 6 13:38:45 debian1 kernel:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 22:54 -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Nusinow) writes:
>
> > The modularization effort seems to be progressing,
> > but if we can move to quilt rapidly then we'll be all the better for it,
> > since that experience can be applied to the modular tree pack
> Hi,
>
> I'd like all errors from my xsession to go to the syslogd daemon instead
> of ~/.xsession-error.
>
> Can that be easily done?
You may use 'logger' for that; see man logger for details.
E.g. find 'exec >>"$ERRFILE" 2>&1' in /etc/X11/Xsession, remove it, and move
entire script into (
Yep. I put it in the TODO.
Anyone care to commit for me?
Index: TODO
===
--- TODO(revision 149)
+++ TODO(working copy)
@@ -9,7 +9,221 @@
-
* Copy over applicable packaging infras
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:54:57PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Nusinow) writes:
>
> > The modularization effort seems to be progressing,
> > but if we can move to quilt rapidly then we'll be all the better for it,
> > since that experience can be applied to the modular tr
Daniel Stone wrote:
> The modular transition is very tricky -- indeed, large swathes are not
> completed.
Wasn't the idea that one piece at a time could be modularized?
That still seems wise.
> If we continue to dance around with
> ludicrous patch audits
Hey, if it's done right (meaning "the way
On 2005-06-04 23:36:47 +0200, Albrecht Gebhardt wrote:
> debian packages + sources at (version is 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13.uk):
>
> deb http://debian.uni-klu.ac.at/debian.uniklu sarge/uniklu/desktop \
> main contrib non-free main-uk contrib-uk non-free-uk
> # (it is in main)
I tried both 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13
Hi,
I'd like all errors from my xsession to go to the syslogd daemon instead
of ~/.xsession-error.
Can that be easily done?
--
"They told me I was gullible ... and I believed them!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:54:57PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Nusinow) writes:
> > The modularization effort seems to be progressing,
> > but if we can move to quilt rapidly then we'll be all the better for it,
> > since that experience can be applied to the modular tree
18 matches
Mail list logo
