Bug#287249: xserver-xfree86: Crashes on SPARC with Elite3D/m6

Hi, I've found the Elite3D firmware from Solaris in the net: /usr/lib/afb.ucode. Loading this (with afbinit), it works. Seems that the issue of #245246 isn't solved completely. Otherwise, I wouldn't have encountered this problem. (Or did I miss some warning during the installation process?) bye,

Re: that damn debian xlibs/openbox bug!

On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 10:58:01AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:06:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 12:05:29PM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Starting with version 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 of debian xlibs, openbox overlay >

Re: that damn debian xlibs/openbox bug!

On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:06:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 12:05:29PM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Starting with version 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 of debian xlibs, openbox overlay > > panels are broken: switching desktops of alt-tab'ing keeps the trans

Bug#287249: xserver-xfree86: Crashes on SPARC with Elite3D/m6

Hi, FYI, I tried xserver-xorg etc. (from Ubuntu / current hoary) and got the same result. bye, Roland --

Re: /usr/X11R6/lib64 symlink for amd64

On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:39:43AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 01:04:01PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: [...] > > Please wait a little... I've just contacted my sponsor to upload a new > > revision of xfree86-driver-synaptics which fixes 286085 > > (xfree86-driver-synapt

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

On 2004-12-31 04:34:13 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Well, let's call this bug what it is, then. Note that gnome-terminal isn't the only application that keeps the primary selection when it is no longer highlighted. Mozilla, Opera and Emacs all have the same behavior. And I don't think this is

Bug#273993: The error is still in newer packages

> On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 04:47:38PM +0100, Nicolas DEGAND wrote: > > I downloaded the 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 packages this morning. The error was > > still there. > > Just FYI, if the package changelog doesn't say the nv driver hasn't been > patched since -7, you can be pretty confident that you won't see

Re: dri_util.c:157: warning: pointer targets differ in signedness.

On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 12:33 -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote: > --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm talking about 2d Xdrivers, where current MergedFB is built. I think > these can be built with the Mesa/lib/r200_dri.so files that live in > X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so? Nope, compl

Bug#285501: marked as done (MultiKey do not work anymore)

Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:39:29 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285501: MultiKey do not work anymore has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#285485: please remove this bug report: problem solved

On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:22:55AM -0500, James D. Freels wrote: > It turned out to be coincidental that this bug showed up on my system at > the same time that the -9 version of the xfree86 packages were released. > It turns out that you must not use the "--force-tls=classic" switch with > the nvi

Bug#285543: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: read-edid should be suggested only in i386)

Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:41:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285543: xserver-xfree86: read-edid should be suggested only in i386 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#213076: still there

On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 05:58:23PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > FWIW, this bug is still there. I had no reason to believe it wasn't. I don't know what the canonical method for a daemon removing its pidfile is, but patches to xdm and xfs to implement it would be welcome. If no one else ever b

Bug#257062: i915 support

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:32:32PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Any news? > > FYI, I'm currently using the xserver-xfree86 package from > , which has > support for i915. I poked around there for a moment, but could not find anything. There are a lot

Bug#277832: still not fixed...

retitle 277832 xterm: make xterm treat the primary selection exactly as gnome-terminal does severity 277832 wishlist tag 277832 - fixed-upstream thanks On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > reopen 277832 > thanks > > I have xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9, and the problem (as d

Bug#285485: marked as done (xfree86 packages upgrade to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 for 2.6.9 kernels fails nvidia driver)

Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:36:54 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285485: xfree86 packages upgrade to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 for 2.6.9 kernels fails nvidia driver has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you cla

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r2110 - in trunk/debian: . local

Author: branden Date: 2004-12-31 04:49:14 -0500 (Fri, 31 Dec 2004) New Revision: 2110 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml Log: Update information in the FAQ problems GNU Emacs and Sawfish have with XKB's "fake keys". Modified: trunk/debi

Processed: Re: Bug#277832: still not fixed...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 277832 xterm: make xterm treat the primary selection exactly as > gnome-terminal does Bug#277832: xterm: copy/paste of non-ISO-8859-1 characters between uxterm windows malfunctions Changed Bug title. > severity 277832 wishlist Bug#277832: xte

Bug#285396: [ARM] wide chars don't work

[I am not subscribed to -arm; please be sure include the bug address in your reply.] On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 03:30:50AM +0100, Gaetan Leurent wrote: > Nicolas George wrote on 13 Dec 2004 01:53:59 +0100: > > > xterm is built with the default -mstructure-size-boundary value, 32. This > > leads to s

Re: ATI Radeon 9200 256MB PCI xfree86-4.3.0.1 - hang

On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 02:54 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 11:27:50PM -0500, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > No, but only the first 128 MB of video RAM are directly accessible. > > Unfortunately, the radeon driver doesn't know how to deal with this yet; > > until that's fixed, t

Re: Crusoe-Bug with XFree86 / How to patch?

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 09:49:30AM +0100, Ilja Gerhardt wrote: [...] > I fetched the source with apt-get source & am able to build the package > with dpkg-buildpackage... [...] > But: How do I supply an additional patch (passing -O1 > -fomit-frame-pointer to my gcc) - I tried to manage this... But

Bug#285309: xserver-xfree86 not upgrading correctly from xserver-xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 to 1-9

retitle 285309 xserver-xfree86: SEGV during upgrades from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 to -9 tag 285309 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 02:20:20PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 > > The upgrade of this package to version 4.3.0.dfsg.

Bug#285323: marked as done (xfonts-base.alias MISSING)

Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:14:59 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285323: Acknowledgement (xfonts-base.alias MISSING) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Processed: Re: Bug#285323: Acknowledgement (xfonts-base.alias MISSING)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 285323 + unreproducible Bug#285323: xfonts-base.alias MISSING There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Re: Bug#285309: xserver-xfree86 not upgrading correctly from xserver-xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 to 1-9

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 285309 xserver-xfree86: SEGV during upgrades from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 to -9 Bug#285309: xserver-xfree86 not upgrading correctly from xserver-xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 to 1-9 Changed Bug title. > tag 285309 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#285309: xs

Re: that damn debian xlibs/openbox bug!

On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 12:05:29PM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > Hi, > > Starting with version 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 of debian xlibs, openbox overlay > panels are broken: switching desktops of alt-tab'ing keeps the transient > panel focused and in the forground until ENTER is pressed. Sounds li

Processed: tagging 285222

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6 > # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff > -r 2108:2109 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86" > tags 285222 + pending Bug#285222: [FAQ] URL broken

Bug#284111: xserver-xfree86: Doesn't scan PCI domains above 0000 on startup

> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 03:01:27 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Branden> Yes; I apologize for hastily dismissing your report. The Branden> fix is probably a for and a break away, but I think I will Branden> CC David Mosberger on this message, as he almost certain

Bug#273993: The error is still in newer packages

On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 04:47:38PM +0100, Nicolas DEGAND wrote: > I downloaded the 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 packages this morning. The error was > still there. Just FYI, if the package changelog doesn't say the nv driver hasn't been patched since -7, you can be pretty confident that you won't see a change i

Bug#285199: After upgrade X starts slowly

reassign 285199 wdm retitle 285199 wdm: taking a long time to start thanks On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 11:37:58AM -0500, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 16:53 +0200, Vesa Savolainen wrote: > > > > After upgrading xlibmesa-dri to version 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 XWindowSystem > > starts slowly (to

Bug#285222: [FAQ] URL broken in new section #debianplans

On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 08:31:08PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > Package: xfree86-common > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 > Severity: minor > > Hi, > > The reference in the new FAQ > entry "What are Debian's plans with respect to X.Org and XFree86?", is >

Processed: Re: Bug#285199: After upgrade X starts slowly

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 285199 wdm Bug#285199: After upgrade X starts slowly Bug reassigned from package `xlibmesa-dri' to `wdm'. > retitle 285199 wdm: taking a long time to start Bug#285199: After upgrade X starts slowly Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping process

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r2109 - in trunk/debian: . local

Author: branden Date: 2004-12-31 03:45:18 -0500 (Fri, 31 Dec 2004) New Revision: 2109 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml Log: Redirect broken hyperlink to freedesktop.org in the FAQ to a page that actually exists (for now). Thanks to Lo?

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r2108 - in trunk/debian: . local

Author: branden Date: 2004-12-31 03:42:04 -0500 (Fri, 31 Dec 2004) New Revision: 2108 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml Log: Add FAQ entry: How can I set up my X server or X terminal to use XKB without any X libraries or XKB data install

Bug#275005: xserver-xfree86: I can reproduce the Xv related hangs in my laptop (Acer TravelMate 527TXV)

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:35:50PM +0100, Eneko Lacunza wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 > Followup-For: Bug #275005 > > I don't remember any X server crash during normal operation, but > it crashes easily in a few seconds when I start to play a movie > using Xv extensi

Bug#285075: marked as done (xutils: apt-get upgrade fails for today's DSA (security advisory). )

Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 03:30:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285075: xutils: apt-get upgrade fails for today's DSA (security advisory). has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#284111: xserver-xfree86: Doesn't scan PCI domains above 0000 on startup

unmerge 284111 reopen 284111 retitle 284111 xserver-xfree86: doesn't scan PCI domains above thanks [Hi David -- we might have a new problem with the damnable PCI domain scanning code with XFree86. Please see below.] On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:21:51PM -0500, Ron Murray wrote: > >On Fri, Dec

Re: xspec 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4: missing *.png files

[Are you subscribed to this list? If so, I apologize for the private copy of this mail.] On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:40:09PM +0100, NMarci wrote: > Hi! > > In the xspec 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 package there are html files > which refers to several > grohtml-*.png files which are missing. > > Where can I

Processed: Re: Bug#284111: xserver-xfree86: Doesn't scan PCI domains above 0000 on startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 284111 Bug#284111: xserver-xfree86: Doesn't scan PCI domains above on startup Bug#279436: xserver-xfree86: fix for bug #246782 breaks X server on machines with no PCI bus #0 Disconnected #284111 from all other report(s). > reopen 284111 B

Re: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 should be ready to go

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:27:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:27:23AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Fabio, > > > > I'm done mucking with the SVN trunk; as discussed on IRC today I think > > we're ready for a -9 release. > > Could you please consider applying Fra

Bug#283929: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [trident] XVideo applications lock up machine at depth 24 on CyberBlade/i1 rev 93 [Acer Travel Mate 354TE])

Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 02:53:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283929: followup has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Processed: Re: Bug#283929: followup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 283929 xserver-xfree86: [trident] XVideo applications lock up machine > at depth 24 on CyberBlade/i1 rev 93 [Acer Travel Mate 354TE] Bug#283929: xserver-xfree86: [trident] XVideo applications lockup machine Changed Bug title. > tag 283929 - mo

Re: ATI Radeon 9200 256MB PCI xfree86-4.3.0.1 - hang

On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 11:27:50PM -0500, Michel Dänzer wrote: > No, but only the first 128 MB of video RAM are directly accessible. > Unfortunately, the radeon driver doesn't know how to deal with this yet; > until that's fixed, the amount of video RAM has to be limited to 128 MB > using the Video

Bug#283764: X clients will not start. Fix found.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:10:40PM -0800, David Lawyer wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > retitle 283764 xfree86-common: Xsession can barf if user has aliased ls to > > force colors on > > thanks > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:14:40PM -0800, David L

Re: /usr/X11R6/lib64 symlink for amd64

On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 01:04:01PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > [I am not subscribed to debian-amd64.] > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 08:29:12PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > [...] > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:40:42PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Hello. > [...] > > > Would the X maintainers