Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 249447 grave
Bug#249447: xserver-xfree86: Problem when upgrading from 4.3.0-7 to
4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 on Unstable
Bug#251690: xserver-xfree86: config script exits with status 127
Bug#252379: xserver-xfree86: fails to reinstall
Bug#252570: xserver-xf
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:20:33PM -0700, Jeff Bowden wrote:
> >>$ xterm -sb
> >>xterm: bad command line option "-sb"
> >>
> >>usage: xterm [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
> >>[] []
> >> [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [-C] [-Sccn]
> >>
>
On Τετ 30 Ιουν 2004 01:39, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Well, sure, you can keep adding new options all the time, but it
> will be a maintenence problem keeping it correct and up to date.
True, but this applies for everything, and maintaining will be easy
for older releases, only the latest will
I'm seeing this too, though slightly differently than the two other
ways described.
When I start X (on sid i386, with or without the alt_tab_fix.diff
applied), whether from kdm or from "startx", the Alt key works
normally in Emacs running as a separate X app, and Meta (i.e.,
"Windows" key) with ta
[Konstantinos Margaritis]
> There is no reason why it should not work, after all, I can just add
> a new option for the next release.
Well, sure, you can keep adding new options all the time, but it will
be a maintenence problem keeping it correct and up to date.
> unpredictable ways? I don't rea
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:10:18AM +0200, Jeff wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
I'm running it from within a vncserver session using xfce4 as
session/window manager. Same version of xterm seems to not exhibit
these problems on another mach
On Τετ 30 Ιουν 2004 00:39, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Not sure if it is a good idea to hardcode in the names of debian
> releases like that. The package should work also after sarge is
> released, and a new version is being developed.
There is no reason why it should not work, after all, I can
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 20:37, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 05:43:47PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > +--+
> > | NOTE:|
> > |
[Konstantinos Margaritis]
> Ok, here is what i have now:
> conffiles.d/:
> sarge woody
Not sure if it is a good idea to hardcode in the names of debian
releases like that. The package should work also after sarge is
released, and a new version is being developed.
> It will read the /etc/debian_
retitle 254565 xserver-xfree86: [savage] two cursors display when using an ARGB
cursor theme on VT8636A TwisterK
tag 254565 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
[The following is a form letter.]
Dear bug submitter,
Since the XFree86 X server is a large and complex piece of software, some
more information
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:54:49 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254526: xfree86: default-display-manager should instead be
got from a file inside /etc/default/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 254565 xserver-xfree86: [savage] two cursors display when using an
> ARGB cursor theme on VT8636A TwisterK
Bug#254565: [savage] two cursors display when using an alpha cursor theme with
VT8636A TwisterK
Changed Bug title.
> tag 254565 + morei
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:53:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 04:06:23AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Kevin Boergens wrote:
> > > http://netghost.narod.ru/gff/graphics/summary/xbm.htm
> > >
> > > I need support for the X Bit
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:04:50PM +0200, Martijn van de Streek wrote:
> On di, 2004-06-15 at 14:31 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> > If it can be verified that he is not doing "aggressive relicensing", then it
> > is safe. If he is doing "aggressive relicesning" like Dawes, who claims
> > tha
tag 254119 + upstream
retitle 254119 xserver-xfree86: [keyboard] Option "AutoRepeat" in XF86Config-4
has no effect (but xset r rate works)
thanks
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 10:31:37PM -0400, David wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: normal
>
> I have the line
>
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:34:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233653: that's ok today
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: wishlist
Use the following to write a FAQ entry.
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 19:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 23:33 -0400, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:13, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2004-06-
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:10:18AM +0200, Jeff wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
> Severity: normal
>
> I'm running it from within a vncserver session using xfce4 as
> session/window manager. Same version of xterm seems to not exhibit
> these problems on another machine running X
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 04:06:23AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Kevin Boergens wrote:
> > http://netghost.narod.ru/gff/graphics/summary/xbm.htm
> >
> > I need support for the X BitMap format. On the page mentioned about I
> > found a few pieces of code fr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 254119 + upstream
Bug#254119: xserver-xfree86: Option "AutoRepeat" in XF86Config-4 has no effect
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> retitle 254119 xserver-xfree86: [keyboard] Option "AutoRepeat" in
> XF86Config-4 has no effect (but xse
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 233653 - help
Bug#233653: xlibmesa-gl-dev: apt-get will not upgrade xlibmesa-{gl,glu}-dev
from 4.2.1-16 to 4.3.0-2
Tags were: help unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:20:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224575: xserver-xfree86: Xfree 4.3 - kernel Version
Problem 2.5 / 2.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 10:48:06AM +0300, AKL. Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems all things are clear, so why don't include lt keymap patch in
> Debian xlibs ?
We did:
xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* Fix problem with numbers and symbols being un-typable in the
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 08:19:23PM +0200, Vorname Nachname wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'd like to have these 3 events
>
> xmodmap -e 'keycode 160 = XF86AudioMute'
> xmodmap -e 'keycode 174 = XF86AudioLowerVolume'
> xmodmap -e 'keycode 176 = XF86AudioRaiseVolume'
>
> take effect when X starts.
>
tag 253660 + moreinfo upstream
retitle 253660 xserver-xfree86: [chips] SEGV when running neverball on F69000
HiQVideo rev 100
severity 253660 important
thanks
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:17:56PM -0400, Graham Knap wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
>
> X crashes when I la
tag 253806 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 10:16:04AM +0200, Floris Kraak wrote:
> Package: xvfb
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: important
>
> Xvfb fails to start, complaining about the 'fixed' font. The recommendations
> made in /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz have been foll
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 253806 + moreinfo
Bug#253806: xvfb: Xvfb fails to start: could not open default font 'fixed'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 253660 + moreinfo upstream
Bug#253660: X crashes when attempting to start Neverball
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, upstream
> retitle 253660 xserver-xfree86: [chips] SEGV when running neverball on F69000
> HiQVideo rev 100
Bug#25366
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:03:40AM -0700, Wade Richards wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running xserver-xfree86 version 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 on testing.
>
> I've had my X server crash 4 or 5 times in the past couple of weeks,
> usually when I'm viewing web pages in FireFox. I don't have a sequence
> of steps to
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
I'm running it from within a vncserver session using xfce4 as
session/window manager. Same version of xterm seems to not exhibit
these problems on another machine running X to the screen and
gnome/metacity.
$ xterm -sb
xterm: bad command l
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I would like to get a competent comment to
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229426 .
>
> Summary:
>
> the Windows key does not work in IceWM since some X versions, maybe 4.3.
> Xev shows the events but IceWM does not get them somehow. Setting
> Option "
tag 253480 - moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:44:04PM -0400, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please compile and deploy this version of xdm on a system where you can
> > reproduce this bug, and let me know if it resolves the problem.
>
> Branden
tag 253088 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:07:42AM +0300, Heikki Kantola wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid
>
> I just noticed that the more recent XFree86 version seem to somehow
> interfere the VT text consoles on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220657 xlibs-static-dev
Bug#220657: mgapdesk: uses numeric locale for XF86Config
Bug reassigned from package `mgapdesk' to `xlibs-static-dev'.
> retitle 220657 xlibs-static-dev: libxf86config:xf86writeConfigFile() writes
> localized output (d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 253480 - moreinfo
Bug#253480: xdm: XDM fails if the user is over disk quota, but empty files can
be created
Tags were: patch upstream
Tags removed: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 253088 + moreinfo upstream
Bug#253088: VT text display gets mangled with Radeon 9200 dualhead setup
Tags were: sid
Tags added: moreinfo, upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
reassign 220657 xlibs-static-dev
retitle 220657 xlibs-static-dev: libxf86config:xf86writeConfigFile() writes
localized output (decimal separator) when it shouldn't
tag 220657 + upstream
thanks
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 11:03:05PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> Hello dear developers,
>
> this i18
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # asked for more info on 2004-06-16
> tags 252895 + moreinfo
Bug#252895: xbase-clients: [xfontsel] crashes with BadValue error on X_OpenFont
request
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # awaiting info since 2004-06-13
> tags 220675 + moreinfo
Bug#220675: xserver-common: dpkg-reconfigure refuses to change the X server
nice value
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Hello,
I would like to get a competent comment to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229426 .
Summary:
the Windows key does not work in IceWM since some X versions, maybe 4.3.
Xev shows the events but IceWM does not get them somehow. Setting
Option "XkbOptions" "altwin:left_m
On Τρι 29 Ιουν 2004 17:34, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> ok, how about spliting the conffiles to two dirs, for woody/sarge,
> or with a suffix in the filename (eg. kde2.woody, kde3.sarge).
Ok, here is what i have now:
conffiles.d/:
sarge woody
conffiles.d/sarge:
ispell.preinst xfree86-kbd.pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 256875 + fixed-upstream patch pending sid upstream
Bug#256875: metacity: Alt-Tab fails to actually change windows
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream, patch, pending, sid, upstream
> severity 256875 serious
Bug#256875: metacity: Alt-
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:15:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 01:42:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I am willing to expend significant work on this; indeed, I'm in the
> > middle of my rejuvinated xlibs work, and am prepared to put in the work
> > to disable the li
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:11:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 01:42:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Fonts and docs are a clear decision: the monolithic tree is the only
> > provider of these. Despite best intentions (and efforts), most apps are
> > still only avail
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 01:42:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I am willing to expend significant work on this; indeed, I'm in the
> middle of my rejuvinated xlibs work, and am prepared to put in the work
> to disable the libs on the server side - all the packaging work that
> would be needed to t
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 01:42:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Fonts and docs are a clear decision: the monolithic tree is the only
> provider of these. Despite best intentions (and efforts), most apps are
> still only available in the monolithic tree.
As best I can recall, it shouldn't be too mu
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 09:02]:
> > * Should we regard X.Org or FreeDesktop.Org as our upstream source?
>
> Yes, I'd go with one of them. Keith Packard is also in the NM queue
> and interested in
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:16:10AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The point was that I think if there's two competing X implementations,
> the X strike force should choose the one with the highest quality, not
> the one with the most features.
I think it is too easily for the former to be easily
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 12:00:32AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040618 21:55]:
> > I'm deliberately not choosing sides here, even though I know you're
> > asking for people to choose sides. IMO, however, you (the X Strike
> > Force) are best qualified to choo
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:31:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:30:53PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This has been a long-standing wishlist request, which was languished
> > because (as I understand it), nobody wanted to futz with the imake
> > build system enough
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:13:39AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Well, no. I have a Mach64 GX which (last I tried) does not support any
> mode with more than 256 bits. See #76291.
As I understand it, this is because no one ever forward-ported some of the
XFree86 3.3.6 Mach64 server's RAMDAC supp
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:30:53PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:34:09AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > I'd also like to see the fonts moved to arch any, I got side tracked
> > attempting to switch from .pcf.gz to .ttf format, but there's no reason we
> > can't simply c
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 00:52 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:18:56AM -0700, David Meggy wrote:
> > Hi, I just tried the new debian installer (labelled June 25th on the ftp
> > site). When I tried to setup X windows, I was given a choice of video
> > cards. Radeon was not in
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:57:33AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:42:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 2) Most of the X.Org/freedesktop.org folks aren't as psychotically
> >meticulous about license issues as I am;
>
> ... which isn't to say that we don't care.
S
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:08:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:34:09AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > The XSF should support only a single X server using the "standard" DDX
> > for now. With a virtual package, someone could package up kdrive X
> > servers and let p
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:34:09AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Mostly I'd like to see reasonably small packages which are updated and
> maintained separately so that we don't continue to have an over-arching 'X
> version' and instead have several distinct X server packages and a single
> librar
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:42:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 07:42:24AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > * Should we go our own way starting from the "sanitized" XFree86 CVS
> > > snapshot we've prepared?
> >
> > I don't see much point in doing this again since oth
If I change the ZAxisMapping line to
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
then scrolling works, and the other buttons become button-6 and 7. So
I think it's quite likely that previously the ZAxisMapping line (the
one mapping to "6 7") was being misread, and in fact the wheel was
always being mapped to
Programs
* ProgramsForEveryCreditSituation
* LendersReplyWithin 24hours
* BorrowUpTo 125%of YourHomesValue
* SpecialProgramsForSelfEmployed
* NoIncomeVerificationPrograms
http://xAGAE.edjihjem.info/?Szo9UaSwrWtjbSSFzinI
Programs
* ProgramsForEveryCreditSituation
* LendersReplyWithin 24hours
* BorrowUpTo 125%of YourHomesValue
* SpecialProgramsForSelfEmployed
* NoIncomeVerificationPrograms
http://yKHzW.dmblmiff.info/?5i7UDp5faFc2WBBzALAw
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 07:42:24AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > * Should we go our own way starting from the "sanitized" XFree86 CVS
> > snapshot we've prepared?
>
> I don't see much point in doing this again since other people have
> already done this in the past, right? And if we don't use o
Programs
* ProgramsForEveryCreditSituation
* LendersReplyWithin 24hours
* BorrowUpTo 125%of YourHomesValue
* SpecialProgramsForSelfEmployed
* NoIncomeVerificationPrograms
http://OVXtv.dmblmiff.info/?5i7UDp5faFc2WBBfcnyX
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
As can be seen, this is a mouse with (including the wheel mouse up and
down events) 7 buttons, so I map the wheel movements to 6 and 7, and
this used to work. But now it's stopped working: emacs, konqueror,
mozilla, gnome-terminal,
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:18:56AM -0700, David Meggy wrote:
> Hi, I just tried the new debian installer (labelled June 25th on the ftp
> site). When I tried to setup X windows, I was given a choice of video
> cards. Radeon was not in the list. Ati was but that did not work. So
> I chose ati, a
On Τρι 29 Ιουν 2004 14:12, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Konstantinos Margaritis]
>
> > * of all the conffiles.d, we only need xfree86-kbd, and probably
> > kde(but updated for kde 3)
>
> If possible, make sure the package work in Woody as well as in
> Sarge/Sid.
ok, how about spliting the conffil
I might have a bug, but I wanted to ask some info gathering questions to
see if it might just be me misconfiguring my box. I have Rage 128 and
just recently upgraded to Sarge. Running xserver-xfree8 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4,
Viewsonic E40 setup with Advanced option for syncing in
dpkg-reconfigure.
The prob
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Hi, I just tried the new debian installer (labelled June 25th on the ftp
site). When I tried to setup X windows, I was given a choice of video
cards. Radeon was not in the list. Ati was but that did not work. So
I chose ati, and then edited by h
Fabio wrote:
> 256706 is still the result of the same breakage. no need to keep it
> separate from all the others.
I'm afraid I'm no longer subscribed to debian-x, and the archive is at least a
week behind, so I don't know which is now the case:
a. A new patch has been pulled from upstream CVS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 256706 !
Bug#256706: Win-Tab switching broken in dfsg.1-5
Changed Bug submitter from "Nathaniel W. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Kevin
Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 256706 !
Bug#256706: Win-Tab switching broken in dfsg.1-5
Changed Bug submitter from Kevin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to "Nathaniel W.
Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Branden Robinson wrote:
As of xserver-xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 (or possibly earlier), this bug no
longer manifests on my system.
Thanks for following up, and I'm glad to hear the problem is resolved!
Mr. Bilderbeek, has this problem also been resolved for you? If so, I
will close these bugs.
[Konstantinos Margaritis]
> * of all the conffiles.d, we only need xfree86-kbd, and probably
> kde(but updated for kde 3)
If possible, make sure the package work in Woody as well as in
Sarge/Sid.
> * ispell needs to be updated to new versions which are (I think)
> debconf base
Yes, some major r
On Κυρ 27 Ιουν 2004 09:21, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > [Christian Perrier]
> >
> > > As a way to circumvent this, I propose that we pre-seed
> > > xserver-xfree86 settings about keyboard, mostly
> > > "xserver-xfree86/config/inputdevice/keyboard/m
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:03:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi listadmins,
>
> This person has grossly misconfigured his TMDA such that it sends
> challenges to people who send messages to our mailing lists (this
> doesn't really surprise me given the mentality of people who tend to use
>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:33:38PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> The ATI Radeon IGP 9100 chipset from Nvidea is supported by the version
> of XFree86 4.3.99 that was available before the big license change. It
> was in the radeon driver. Can it be backported?
It is not from nVidia/NVIDIA: it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 256706 fixed-upstream
Bug#256706: Win-Tab switching broken in dfsg.1-5
Tags were: patch sid upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> tag 256706 upstream
Bug#256706: Win-Tab switching broken in dfsg.1-5
Tags were: fixed-upstream patch sid upstream
Tags
76 matches
Mail list logo
