On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:04:47PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > We could also start the slow app migration, and autotool missing apps as
> > we go; for the time being, just disable the ones that are there. Moving
> > to Thomas Dickey's xterm en
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:53:52PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > On Friday 18 June 2004 09.02, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > > * Should we ensure that multiple implementations of the X Window
> > > System are packaged
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:57:44PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > * What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
> >
> > I'd like to see a packaging that gives me the ability to mix and match
> > pieces from any of the choices
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:37:33PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So, the big question is how to get everyone back into a single tree.
> > Ideally, Egbert would let us just ditch the imake build system and move
> > X.Org to autotools in one big jum
> So the problem was in libxaw7. After downgrading libxaw7 from
> 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 xterm works fine.
>
> Thank you, Thomas.
no problem (I think this one should be redirected to the X libraries)
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
pgpjloeH
Package: libxaw7
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 dies with SIGSEGV:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb xterm
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x4
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:32:09PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:40:14PM +0200, Mykola A. Nickishov wrote:
> > Package: xterm
> > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> >
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: testing/unstable
> > APT prefers
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:40:14PM +0200, Mykola A. Nickishov wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
> Severity: normal
>
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i
Efectivo Ahora, damos crédito a tus Ilusiones.
Somos su solución para obtener crédito en el día sin mas requisitos que su
cuenta corriente con chequera.
El límite de crédito que desea lo determina el movimiento que tiene en su
cuenta.
Retire hoy mismo el efectivo que necesita, sin garantias ad
also sprach Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.22.2237 +0200]:
> At one point you mentionned the shortcomings of autotools, it
> might be worth to check if cons or scons are more apt to build
> X than autotools.
While I agree that autotools are mostly a pain, I also didn't find
a viable
i have a couple of ttf fonts that i installed in one directory on
my system. now after installing additional debian ttf-packages,
i would like to have *one* clean solution for all fonts. is there
a script that copies the fonts around, generates indexes etc for
cases like this?
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-22 16:44:28 -0500 (Tue, 22 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1559
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/xterm.docs
Log:
Refer to text version of XTerm FAQ by the correct filename.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 03:48:49AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The typescript file is attached.
It does show that screen isn't issuing the initialization string.
And in setting out to explain the results, I see the problem (the termcap).
Here's a readable version of the typescript from covering t
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-22 16:36:54 -0500 (Tue, 22 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1558
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Fix my email address, which was butchered in the changelog due to $DEBEMAIL
being undefined on my host.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, the big question is how to get everyone back into a single tree.
> Ideally, Egbert would let us just ditch the imake build system and move
> X.Org to autotools in one big jump; we have almost all of the build
> infrastructure ready and waiting in
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-2-k7
Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8
Versions of p
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 13:57, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > * What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
> >
> > I'd like to see a packaging that gives me the ability to mix and match
> > pieces from any of the choices we have avail
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 19.53, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
[packaging more than one X server]
> Users can still have the freedom to choose. XSF will only support one,
> but other people are perfectly allowed to package other servers. Noone
> will ever stop them to do so.
My point was exactly the
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: important
If the system is powered up and X is started by kdm, X will often fail
because of a missing core pointer. Starting X manually immediately after
(e.g. using /etc/init.d/kdm start), always succeeds.
The problem goes away if psmouse
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 09:02]:
> > * Should we regard X.Org or FreeDesktop.Org as our upstream source?
>
> Yes, I'd go with one of them. Keith Packard is also in the NM queue
> and interested in
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-22 13:16:23 -0500 (Tue, 22 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1557
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/TODO
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xlibs.bug
Log:
Enhance xlibs package's bug script to report compiled XKB data for X
server, if possible.
Modif
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I think we can all agree here; I hope, anyway.
Yes at least i do (not wearing any hat).
> I personally have an affinity for the modular tree, as it solves many
> problems; my bias here being that I'm a (currently, paid) developer on
> it.
>
> Here are t
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > * What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
>
> I'd like to see a packaging that gives me the ability to mix and match
> pieces from any of the choices we have available. IOW, meta packages to
> get the "full" compliment of each vers
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> #include
>
> On Friday 18 June 2004 09.02, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> > * Should we ensure that multiple implementations of the X Window
> > System are packaged, or standardize on just one?
>
> from a user perspective, mult
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > * What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
>
> As a user, all I care about:
> * DFSG-free
That's one of the reason we need to change.
> * is ready whenever Debian woul
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Anders Karlsson wrote:
> On Friday 18 Jun 2004 08:02, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > As you might have seen from the messages on
> > debian-devel-changes, 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 has been accepted into unstable.
>
> Seen it, downloaded it and installed it.
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-22 12:43:26 -0500 (Tue, 22 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1556
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Credit Fabio for r1555.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===
--- trunk/debian
Accepted:
lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-5_powerpc.deb
libice6-
Package: xlibs-data
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Japanese fonts can't be displayed under ja_JP.UTF-8 locale.
Please update XLC_LOCALE for ja_JP.UTF-8.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'tes
clone 255439 -1
retitle -1 Wrong driver chosen for ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility U1
reassign -1 xserver-xfree86
thanks
* Cristian Escalante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 23:22]:
> > > - Detect the wrong vga card (apm instead of ati);
> > Can you send your /var/log/XFree86.0.log file pleas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 255439 -1
Bug#255439: d-i report
Bug 255439 cloned as bug 255689.
> retitle -1 Wrong driver chosen for ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility U1
Bug#255689: d-i report
Changed Bug title.
> reassign -1 xserver-xfree86
Bug#255689: Wrong driver chose
On my machine with Window Maker the behaviour is slightly different: all
Alt- shortcuts work, and Alt-Tab switching works, but swallows the first
keypress in the new window. In xterm, the cursor changes from shallow to
filled after the swallowed keypress, as if the window receives the
keyboard focu
33 matches
Mail list logo
