Bug#254257: marked as done (libxcursor1: Xrendered Xcursor rendering artifacts & flicker)

2004-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:42:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#254257: libxcursor1: Xrendered Xcursor rendering artifacts & flicker has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#254257: libxcursor1: Xrendered Xcursor rendering artifacts & flicker

2004-06-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 23:33 -0400, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: > On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:13, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 17:56 -0400, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: > > > Finally, in a simple OpenGL program that does nothing but swap its > > > buffers (attached), the mouse will disa

Re: X Bitmap

2004-06-14 Thread Marc Wilson
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 04:06:23AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Kevin Boergens wrote: > > http://netghost.narod.ru/gff/graphics/summary/xbm.htm > > > > I need support for the X BitMap format. On the page mentioned about I > > found a few pieces of code fr

Re: X Bitmap

2004-06-14 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Kevin Boergens wrote: > http://netghost.narod.ru/gff/graphics/summary/xbm.htm > > I need support for the X BitMap format. On the page mentioned about I > found a few pieces of code from X to support loading and reading xbm > (Very old indeed). I was not

X Bitmap

2004-06-14 Thread Kevin Boergens
Hello! http://netghost.narod.ru/gff/graphics/summary/xbm.htm I need support for the X BitMap format. On the page mentioned about I found a few pieces of code from X to support loading and reading xbm (Very old indeed). I was not able to find out what Debian packages I have to install to get

Bug#254316: xterm: CJK font fails after running slang/ncurses program

2004-06-14 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 06:29:48AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > The latest xterm seems to be able to display CJK characters. However, > > "latest" implies that you have used a previous version of xterm, > using the same locale settings and that works. > Hrm. Perhaps I shou

RE: Jobs at Definity Health

2004-06-14 Thread jobs
Thank you for your interest in Definity Health. We will review the material you have provided and contact you should we have further interest!

Powerful weightloss now available where you are.

2004-06-14 Thread Olen J. Oconnor
Hello, I have a special offer for you... WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT? The most powerful weightloss is now available without prescription. All natural Adipren720 100% Money Back Guarantée! - Lose up to 19% Total Body Weight. - Up to 300% more Weight Loss while dieting. - Loss of 20-35% abdominal Fat. - Redu

Bug#250655: xterm: crashes on paste from abiword

2004-06-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 06:17:50PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:27:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > > > Okay, I will be patient while you explore this. > > > > > > Just as a remark to myself and my fellow "debi

Bug#254316: xterm: CJK font fails after running slang/ncurses program

2004-06-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 11:40:11AM +0200, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > Package: xterm > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid l10n > > Hi > > > The latest xterm seems to be able to display CJK characters. However, "latest" implies that you have used a previous version of xterm, using

Bug#254316: xterm: CJK font fails after running slang/ncurses program

2004-06-14 Thread Geoffrey Lee
Package: xterm Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: normal Tags: sid l10n Hi The latest xterm seems to be able to display CJK characters. However, I found that after running a slang / ncurses application, the characters become garbled again. I've tested this with traditional Chinese and Japanes

Bug#249399: DRI

2004-06-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:55:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 14:30 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I apologize; I confused this bug with one you filed against > > xserver-common. You did the right thing. > > Well, at least the oops is a kernel bug in my book. Yes, bu

debian-vote@lists.debian.org

2004-06-14 Thread Debian-vote
Here is a casino giving away $25 Free when you sign up an account. No credit card required http://25dollarwinner.cls2.org/iwin.html Debian-vote

Bug#254288: xserver-xfree86: [ati] Drops blue bit at depth 24-bit

2004-06-14 Thread Peter Dey
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 ATi driver seems to drop the blue bit at 24-bit colour. Red and yellow colours showing fine. Colours very messed up at 16-bit. Colours fine at 8-bit. I know I probably should be using the atimisc driver, but the X-server wont even start when atimi

Bug#253386: xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] xf86XVCopyYUV12ToPacked not resolved.

2004-06-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 02:47:15AM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote: > So, before sending a huge and useless e-mail... perhaps your script should > check the headers of the repeated bug it's replying to and find out if the > user actually used reportbug? Here's an updated version of the form letter tha

Bug#253386: xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] xf86XVCopyYUV12ToPacked not resolved.

2004-06-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 02:47:15AM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote: > So, before sending a huge and useless e-mail... perhaps your script should > check the headers of the repeated bug it's replying to and find out if the > user actually used reportbug? Those who do not use reportbug well (e.g., by no

Scott Robinson added to backlash blacklist

2004-06-14 Thread Branden Robinson
Scott Robinson, who filed #253386, has a domain or an ISP which has slandered me as a spammer[1]. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mx-1.azc.com[64.213.38.230] said: 553 Dynamic IP Address See: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=65.26.182.85 (in reply to RCPT TO command) Per the thusly-