On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 02:40:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:30:50PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > When I added render support to xclock, I did update the man page to note
> > that the command line arguments are ignored in render mode (which is the
> > default).
[note that i am moving the thread to debian-x only since it would be OT
for the others]
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Whether this fix goes into the next release is a decision for the
> XFree86 4.3.0-8 release manager to make. :)
I think that there is no need for a RM to take a
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:58:02PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The RM position is all yours if Branden agrees.
>
> This is where imho you miss the point. It is OUR decision who has to take
> the position as RM inside OUR team. Noone until now
Hi,
The behaviour the patch (035_tdfx_disable_dri_on_16mb_with_highres.diff)
prevented sounds a lot like bug #179660.
I did some strace back then on an old version of xfree86. The thread
mentioned in the bug report which contains them is moved. It is now in:
http://bzbb.bzflag.org/viewtopic.php?t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 211765 - help
Bug#211765: xfree86: material under non-free licenses in XFree86
Tags were: sarge-ignore upstream help
Tags removed: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 241469 twm: OpaqueResize feature desired
Bug#241469: OpaqueResize desired
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 241274 - experimental
Bug#241274: xfree86-common: keycode 94 not assigned in spanish pc 105 keyboard
(<> keys)
Tags were: moreinfo experimental l10n
Tags removed: experimental
I'm having a hardware problem on that machine ATM. As soon as I can get it
fixed I'll let you know if that change fixes it.
Additionally if that is indeed the problem it should probably be documented
in the NEWS file or with a debconf prompt or something as the mouse is
relatively important for a
having talked with Branden on irc i try to fill in some blanks as
good as i know the content and history of the project ...
* Aivils ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040402 13:08]:
> Here is a possibility add very doubtful thing. Nobody knows how to run
> secondary video adapter and secondary xf86 before tes
tag 211765 - help
thanks
I brought this problem to Jim Gettys's attention several weeks ago (in
January); he has been engaged in discussions with SGI since then, and is
seeking a resolution.
For those who don't know, Jim Gettys is an employee of HP Labs, and one of
the "founding fathers" of the X
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #241034
Hi,
I have the same problem, and maybe one piece of information : X also
outputs the following error message (even when simply running X instead
of xinit or startx) :
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Err
* Aivils ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040402 13:08]:
> Known are matrox, ati open source drivers which support multiple local xf86,
> whith various troubles to start hardware DRI.
> Succesful xinerama start does not correlate with successful multiple local
> xf86 start, even if hardware set is identic an
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: minor
Hi,
-vb This option indicates that a visual bell is preferred
over an
audible one. Instead of ringing the terminal bell
whenever a
Control-G is received, the window will be flashed.
+vb This
Beste SMScity bezoeker,
De e-mail die je zojuist naar [EMAIL PROTECTED] hebt gestuurd is NIET
bij ons aangekomen. Voor vragen aan SMScity dien je contact op
te nemen d.m.v. het contactformulier op de website. Via deze weg
kunnen wij je namelijk veel sneller helpen (meestal binnen 24 uur).
Let op:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:12:45AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Re-reading the bug log and the thread I still cannot understand why you
> downgraded the bug in the first place.
For context, we're talking about #239991.
I would probably have made the same call, given that lost keystrokes
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-02 15:57:03 -0500 (Fri, 02 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1223
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Add item.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
--- trunk/debian/TODO 2004-04-02 20:37:48 UTC (rev 1222)
+++ trunk
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-02 15:37:48 -0500 (Fri, 02 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1222
Modified:
trunk/debian/patches/080_pci_isolate_device_feature.diff
Log:
Change license of PCI "IsolateDevice" feature to MIT/X11 terms per
communication from its author, Aivils Stoss.
Modified: trunk/debian/
Dpkg newb. here. Been installing my grafix card's closed source driver
- ugly, ugly business. But I'm in love w/ the "Debian way", so I
thought I'd have a go at installing it using Debian package management
tools.
So far so good. The driver comes w/ its own "libGL.so.1.3.0" - it's
installer (
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 09:58:51AM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> >Excellent! Does the build log show it skipping the
> >xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg nonsense entirely?
>
> xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg doesn't appear at all in the build log. I hope
> that's o.k.
It's perfect. Pr
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 18:58, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > The RM position is all yours if Branden agrees.
>
> This is where imho you miss the point. It is OUR decision who has to take
> the position as RM inside OUR team. Noone until now has bee
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-02 14:10:38 -0500 (Fri, 02 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1221
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Demote x-window-system-dev's priority to "extra" since it depends on
library -dbg packages, which are themselves of extra priority (see Debian
Poli
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-02 14:04:25 -0500 (Fri, 02 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1220
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Add item.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
--- trunk/debian/TODO 2004-04-02 07:45:31 UTC (rev 1219)
+++ trunk
More Traffic is Good. More Business is Even Better. Today, it's not enough to
drive more business to your site. You must target, attract and convert
motivated, qualified prospects--before the competition does. That takes
technical know-how and ingenuity, which we can provide.
Can They Find Your
Ihre Mail an 'rohrpost' mit dem Subject/Betreff
Re: important
wird zurueckgehalten, bis der Listenmoderator Ihre Email genehmigt.
Der Grund, weshalb eine Genehmigung erforderlich ist:
Absender ist nicht Mitglied der Liste -- e-Mails an die Liste aber
nur für Mitglieder erlaubt!
Entwe
Let's go back to debian-x only. I don't think we need to pester the other
mailing list anymore.
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Even if i am silent on the list (as you know i am quit busy during these
> > days, and if you don't please read -private) lack of response doesn't mean
> >
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: minor
The xterm mouse cursor is a thin line, under debians xterm, it's much
thicker.
Specifying -rv restores the original cursor (but does not do reverse
video, see bug #239510, which is probably related).
It seems that debians xterm does not set mouse c
This can be closed. I apologize for the quick bug report...it turned
out that my keyboard controller had indeed failed. I'm running with a
USB keyboard now, and no problems.
Hadn't seen that one before...again, sorry.
Thanks.
--
Ken Kennedy | http://www.kenzoid.com| [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:12:45AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > important, at best. I'm not suggesting that the patch shouldn't be
> > applied for 4.3.0-8, which, given Branden's lack of response, I assume I
> > am release-managing. However, it
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:30:07AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I didn't see that; all I saw was 'why is no-one asking to be RM :('.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2004/debian-x-200403/msg03703.html
Ahr. Perfect, I am not.
--
Daniel St
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 09:34, Branden Robinson wrote:
> tag 241274 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:19:40PM +0200, Rafael Torresca wrote:
> > # use a pc105 model, not a pc104:
> > # Option"XkbModel" "pc105"
> >
> > I've already done so, but the problem remains.
> >
> > The X
> Hi, this is Branden Robinson, one of the package maintainers for XFree86
> in Debian GNU/Linux.
>
> Andreas Schuldei brought to my attention your patch to restrict PCI
> device resets to a single device in XFree86.
>
> I have made some minor modifications to it and am submitting these back
> to
Ich bin am 02.04.04 nicht im Haus. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich
bitte an Herrn Kunkel ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 06151- 29 78 614)
Viele Grüße,
Katja Fischer
I've installed recently all sid packages and have the same problem:
the key <> doesn't work anymore. (I use Gnome 2).
The problem is identified and I would like to describe here:
when I use the "dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86" and ask for a "pc105"
geometry, the program put a "pc104" in the
Hi Denis,
thanks for your suggestions.
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 07:53, Denis Barbier wrote:
> You could first replace your installed XKB files by the ones shipped by
> xlibs:
> # apt-get -d --reinstall install xlibs
> # dpkg --install --force-confnew --force-confmiss
> /var/cache/apt/archives/x
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I didn't see that; all I saw was 'why is no-one asking to be RM :('.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2004/debian-x-200403/msg03703.html
Fabio
--
fajita: step one
Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
fajita: step two
W
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> important, at best. I'm not suggesting that the patch shouldn't be
> applied for 4.3.0-8, which, given Branden's lack of response, I assume I
> am release-managing. However, it is most certainly not RC.
Even if i am silent on the list (as you know i am qu
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Jan 18 15:15 /etc/X11/X ->
/usr/bin/X11/XFree86
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1742316 Mar 18 06:42 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86
/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /v
Branden Robinson wrote:
Excellent! Does the build log show it skipping the
xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg nonsense entirely?
xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg doesn't appear at all in the build log. I hope
that's o.k.
Gerhard
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 241537 xlibs: AltGr (AltRight) no longer recognized in many apps
> running on Hummingbird Exceed 7.1 X server after upgrading to xlibs 4.3.0
Bug#241537: xlibs: AltGr (AltRi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 241452 + moreinfo
Bug#241452: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on 16MB
Voodoo Banshee
Tags were: sid upstream
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on 16MB
Voodoo Banshee rev 3 and Voodoo3 rev 1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 241274 + moreinfo
Bug#241274: xfree86-common: keycode 94 not assigned in spanish pc 105 keyboard
(<> keys)
Tags were: experimental l10n
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 241452 xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on
> 16MB Voodoo Banshee
Bug#241452: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on Voodoo3 3000
Changed Bug title
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 241469 + upstream
Bug#241469: OpaqueResize desired
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:03:03AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> BTW - If you have a bug which you believe deserves to be marked RC you
> can always just tag it is sarge and sid as well to have it effectively
> ignored for migration purposes.
That's not technically true at the moment, although it'
tag 241452 + moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:46:26PM +0200, Nieko Woets wrote:
> Package: xlibmesa-dri
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> Severity: normal
>
> The Voodoo3 3000 graphics card has no direct rendering on screen
> resolutions higher than 1024x768, but it previously had on versions
> be
tag 241274 + moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:19:40PM +0200, Rafael Torresca wrote:
> # use a pc105 model, not a pc104:
> # Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
>
> I've already done so, but the problem remains.
>
> The XF86Config-4 is:
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identifier "Gene
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:30:50PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> Around 17 o'clock on Apr 1, "Matthias G. Imhof" wrote:
>
> > As stupid as it sounds, but xclock does not appear to use the commandline
> > arguments for -hd color (or -hands color) or -fg color.
>
> When I added render support to
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:12:32AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> in line 37 the closing ";" is missing:
> + xf86FreeInt10 (pInt);
Thanks! Fixed in r1219.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Cogitationis poenam nemo meretur.
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-02 02:45:31 -0500 (Fri, 02 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1219
Modified:
trunk/debian/patches/079_radeon_resume_fix.diff
Log:
Fix missing semicolon (thanks, Andreas Schuldei).
Modified: trunk/debian/patches/079_radeon_resume_fix.diff
It looks most of these (post-4.3.0) changes should be borrowed from
upstream CVS. Amazing how much bug traffic this little client
generates.
See attachment.
Comments welcome. The only one that looks potentially troublesome to me
is the first hunk of the Imakefile patch. I'd probably leave that
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:30:29AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> It's likely that a well-defined question (for a yes/no answer) would get
> >> some results. And as noted before, the appropriate place to ask questions
> >> is not in a newsgroup, b
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:53:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:48:15PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > important, at best. I'm not suggesting that the patch shouldn't be
> > applied for 4.3.0-8, which, given Branden's lack of response, I assume I
> > am release-managi
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:55:01AM -0800, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> How would one check that? I've put my config file below. Sorry all I don't
> know too much about how this works. All I know is that it used to work. I
> upgraded and now it doesn't.
The XFree86 X server's mouse driver was rewritte
Mr. Stoss,
Hi, this is Branden Robinson, one of the package maintainers for XFree86
in Debian GNU/Linux.
Andreas Schuldei brought to my attention your patch to restrict PCI
device resets to a single device in XFree86.
I have made some minor modifications to it and am submitting these back
to you
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:48:15PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> important, at best. I'm not suggesting that the patch shouldn't be
> applied for 4.3.0-8, which, given Branden's lack of response, I assume I
> am release-managing. However, it is most certainly not RC.
Fabio volunteered as well. Why
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:19:36PM +0200, Lars wrote:
> [...]
> > the file that X seems to use /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/se did not get the
> > line that is needed
> [...]
>
> You are right, old layout reads symbols/se and new reads symbols/pc/se.
> But th
Author: branden
Date: 2004-04-02 01:28:00 -0500 (Fri, 02 Apr 2004)
New Revision: 1218
Modified:
trunk/debian/patches/080_pci_isolate_device_feature.diff
Log:
Clarify author and licensing information per Andreas Schuldei.
Modified: trunk/debian/patches/080_pci_isolate_device_feature.diff
=
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:34:30PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 00:22, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Anyway mixing xmodmap and xkb seems to be a bad idea, maybe you should
> > add
> > Option "XkbDisable" "true"
> > to your XF86Config-4 file.
>
> This way, both my confi
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:48:15PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:50:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:22:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > There was little point holding up 4.3.0's progress into sarge because of
> > > it; the exact same
59 matches
Mail list logo
