X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 768 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

2003-11-13 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-11-14 00:28:55 -0500 (Fri, 14 Nov 2003) New Revision: 768 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO Log: Add some more things to do after 4.3.0-1 is released. - debian/TODO Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 767 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

2003-11-13 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-11-14 00:15:15 -0500 (Fri, 14 Nov 2003) New Revision: 767 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-dev.install branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-dev.install.hurd-i386 branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-dev.install.s390 Log: Sto

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 766 - tags

2003-11-13 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-11-13 23:52:11 -0500 (Thu, 13 Nov 2003) New Revision: 766 Added: tags/4.2.1-14/ Log: Tag 4.2.1-14 release. Copied: tags/4.2.1-14 (from rev 765, trunk)

Bug#220678: xserver-xfree86: Not obvious how to configure 1400x1050

2003-11-13 Thread Brian May
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v4 Severity: normal It isn't obvious (for me at least) how to configure my LCD display at its native resolution of 1400x1050 using debconf. Doing a web search seems to indicate that these settings are required: HorizSync 30-82 Ve

Bug#220675: dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common refuses to change the X server nice value

2003-11-13 Thread Peter Hawkins
Package: xserver-common Version: 4.2.1-13 Hi... Small debconf script bug, I think. I just did a dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common and changed the nice value of the xserver from -10 to 0 using debconf. However, Xwrapper.config looked like this after doing so: ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION # Do not edi

Bug#220469: xserver-xfree86: dpkg-reconfigure should create the config file if it doesn't exist

2003-11-13 Thread Uwe Storbeck
Hi Branden > > But if the config file doesn't exist dpkg-reconfigure should create > > a new one instead of refusing to write it: > > Why? dpkg works the same way. If you delete a conffile it will respect > your (apparent) wishes. Ooops, that's new to me. If I change a config file I would expe

Bug#220493: So why is Debian's XFree86 old?....

2003-11-13 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:03:59AM +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote: > On Nov 13, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:58:28AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > The second answer is "integration". The number of packaging issues > > > which come up in packaging such a big project are ver

CVS $Id$ changes in diffs - policy?

2003-11-13 Thread Daniel Stone
Guys, What's the policy on including $Id$ string changes in diffs - yay or nay? Or only if you do a *complete* merge up to that revision? I'm currently prepping a patch that should fix the ()*#$ i830 waitring deadlock o' doom, and wondering what I should do with the $Id$ string change. Cheers! :)

Re: Bug#219163: ITP: synaptic-touchpad -- Synaptics TouchPad driver for XFree86

2003-11-13 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:58:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I think it would be really dumb for a driver author to re-use an > > > existing name for a di

Bug#219714: marked as done (xfree86: FTBFS on i386: lnx_io.c: structure has no member named `rate')

2003-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:11:47 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219714: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#218788: marked as done (Updated Catalan template translations.)

2003-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:11:47 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218788: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#200256: marked as done (xlibs-data: [nls] X doesn't recognize 'ko_KR.EUC-KR' locale)

2003-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:11:47 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#200256: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#220511: X -configure crash

2003-11-13 Thread Martin Kihlgren
Thanks for your reply :D I got X to work using supervesafb and the fb driver in X.. regards, //Martin On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:51:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > retitle 220511 xserver-xfree86: PCI database doesn't recognize Trident 0x2100 > severity 220511 normal > tag 220511 + upstrea

Accepted xfree86 4.2.1-14 (powerpc all source)

2003-11-13 Thread Branden Robinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:29:52 -0500 Source: xfree86 Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients twm x-window-system-dev xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg xfwp xlibs

Processed: Re: Bug#220511: X -configure crash

2003-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 220511 xserver-xfree86: PCI database doesn't recognize Trident 0x2100 Bug#220511: X -configure crash Changed Bug title. > severity 220511 normal Bug#220511: xserver-xfree86: PCI database doesn't recognize Trident 0x2100 Severity set to `normal'

Bug#220511: X -configure crash

2003-11-13 Thread Branden Robinson
retitle 220511 xserver-xfree86: PCI database doesn't recognize Trident 0x2100 severity 220511 normal tag 220511 + upstream thanks On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:02:08AM +0100, Martin Kihlgren wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > > I ran X -configure and got a crash. The XFree86.log.0 is attached. It

Processed: Re: Bug#220493: Want a more recent version of the XFree86-server

2003-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 220493 xfree86: new upstream version is going to be available, please > package it before it's released Bug#220493: Want a more recent version of the XFree86-server Changed Bug title. > reassign 220493 xfree86 Bug#220493: xfree86: new upstream

Processed: Re: Bug#220469: xserver-xfree86: dpkg-reconfigure should create the config file if it doesn't exist

2003-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 220469 wishlist Bug#220469: xserver-xfree86: dpkg-reconfigure should create the config file if it doesn't exist Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Processed: Re: Bug#220448: xserver-xfree86: Some fonts simply don't show up, adobe courier for example

2003-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 220448 + moreinfo Bug#220448: xserver-xfree86: Some fonts simply don't show up, adobe courier for example There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#220448: xserver-xfree86: Some fonts simply don't show up, adobe courier for example

2003-11-13 Thread Branden Robinson
tag 220448 + moreinfo thanks On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:48:15PM -0500, Gregory Stark wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v3 > Severity: normal > > [First of all I had the same problem with the version of X in unstable. This > was one of the reasons I tried the experimental ver

Re: Bug#219163: ITP: synaptic-touchpad -- Synaptics TouchPad driver for XFree86

2003-11-13 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I think it would be really dumb for a driver author to re-use an > > existing name for a different purpose. > > Well, Synaptics could branch out and start making gr

Bug#220469: xserver-xfree86: dpkg-reconfigure should create the config file if it doesn't exist

2003-11-13 Thread Branden Robinson
severity 220469 wishlist thanks On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:05:07PM +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.2.1-12.1 > Severity: minor > > Hi, > > I like the idea protecting changes in the XF86Config-4 config file > by a md5-sum. > But if the config file doesn't exist d

Bug#218615: xserver-xfree86: Crash in "Return To Castle Wolfenstein" causes mouse pointer to hang.

2003-11-13 Thread Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs
Hi! Sorry for the long delay, it seems this is extremely hard to reproduce. Branden Robinson schrieb: > A couple of observations: > 1) You're using NVidia's proprietary server driver. I can't support >that. Can you reproduce the problem using a different brand of video >card, or with th

Bug#220583: Segmentation fault when calling 'xterm -geom 0x0'

2003-11-13 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le jeu 13/11/2003 à 14:44, Sean Neakums a écrit : > Heiko Scheit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I know there is no reason to do so, but when starting an xterm with > > the option '-geom 0x0' it crashes. > > Running 4.2.1-13 here, and I get: > > $ xterm -geom 0x0 > X Error of failed request:

Bug#220583: Segmentation fault when calling 'xterm -geom 0x0'

2003-11-13 Thread Sean Neakums
Heiko Scheit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know there is no reason to do so, but when starting an xterm with > the option '-geom 0x0' it crashes. Running 4.2.1-13 here, and I get: $ xterm -geom 0x0 X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opc

Bug#220583: Segmentation fault when calling 'xterm -geom 0x0'

2003-11-13 Thread Heiko Scheit
Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-12.1 Severity: normal I know there is no reason to do so, but when starting an xterm with the option '-geom 0x0' it crashes. # xterm -geom 0x0 Segmentation fault # -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.4.21 #19 T

Bug#220493: So why is Debian's XFree86 old?....

2003-11-13 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:58:28AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > The short answer is "porting". The XFree86 project has little or no > support for most of Debian's architectures, and making sure that a new > version works on non-i386 machines takes quite a while. This job seems pretty much d

Bug#220493: So why is Debian's XFree86 old?....

2003-11-13 Thread Nathanael Nerode
The short answer is "porting". The XFree86 project has little or no support for most of Debian's architectures, and making sure that a new version works on non-i386 machines takes quite a while. The second answer is "integration". The number of packaging issues which come up in packaging suc

Re: i830 problems on XFree 4.3

2003-11-13 Thread alte-nn
Later this evening I found some more problems with my xfree86 install/config: 1. Hardware cursor is not working displaying some garbage instead of cursor image. SW cursor work fine, but I'm afraid hw cursor doesn't work because of memory problems discussed later. 2. If I try to use more than 8192