Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 214020 grave
Bug#214020: Cannot upgrade/install package xlibs
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 213774 214020
Bug#213774: fails to install
Bug#214020: Cannot upgrade/install package xlibs
Bug#213776: xlibs: Fails to install: debug: command not
severity 214020 grave
merge 213774 214020
thanks
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:26:38PM -0600, Alan Pater wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 4.2.1-11
> Severity: normal
>
> pichón:/# apt-get install xlibs
> Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
> Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho
> Se actualizarán
Description of the problem and patch here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2003-July/009690.html
I've verified that it works in Mozilla Firebird (same patch as in the
above URL):
diff -x changelog -ruN xfree86-4.3.0.orig/build-tree/xc/lib/font/FreeType/ftfuncs.c
xfree86-4.3
Daniel> This information probably belongs in a tutorial, or the gdm/xdm/kdm
manpage, not
Daniel> the X manpage. The X server is unrelated to these desktop managers.
Again, I see
Daniel> your point, but I believe this information is best contained in a
tutorial or
Daniel> such, not a manpage.
ye
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: normal
pichón:/# apt-get install xlibs
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho
Se actualizarán los siguientes paquetes
xlibs
1 actualizados, 0 se instalarán, 0 para eliminar y 66 no actualizados.
119 no instalados del
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 17:49:19 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 627
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/local/FAQ
Log:
Add new entry to the Debian X FAQ: "I've customized my /etc/X11/X,
/etc/X11/Xwrapper.config, and/or /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 files so the
packages do
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 17:33:06 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 626
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Create new metapackage, x-window-system-dev, whose job it is to haul in
all the -dbg and -dev packages (except for libxaw6, which is legacy stuff)
a
Hi,
I noticed on the following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=178242
someone who had a similar problem to me (looks to be a rash of bugs on
this same topic). I am having similar problems with the 4.3.0
experimental pacakges, and before I filed a bug report, I wanted to
fi
Daniel> This information probably belongs in a tutorial, or the gdm/xdm/kdm manpage,
not
Daniel> the X manpage. The X server is unrelated to these desktop managers. Again, I
see
Daniel> your point, but I believe this information is best contained in a tutorial or
Daniel> such, not a manpage.
yes
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: normal
pichón:/# apt-get install xlibs
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho
Se actualizarán los siguientes paquetes
xlibs
1 actualizados, 0 se instalarán, 0 para eliminar y 66 no actualizados.
119 no instalados del
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 17:49:19 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 627
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/local/FAQ
Log:
Add new entry to the Debian X FAQ: "I've customized my /etc/X11/X,
/etc/X11/Xwrapper.config, and/or /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 files so the
packages do
Hi !
I hope, you are the maintainer of the libxcursor-dev package.
I have some problems installing this package on my system. I'm using a debian
sid system with X 4.3 from apt-get.org.
Here are the messages, I get from apt if I try to install it.
debian:/home/tom# apt-get -f install
Reading Pa
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 17:33:06 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 626
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Create new metapackage, x-window-system-dev, whose job it is to haul in
all the -dbg and -dev packages (except for libxaw6, which is legacy stuff)
a
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
Microsoft Customer
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2002, Cumulative Patch" update which fixes
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Ex
Hi,
I noticed on the following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=178242
someone who had a similar problem to me (looks to be a rash of bugs on
this same topic). I am having similar problems with the 4.3.0
experimental pacakges, and before I filed a bug report, I wanted to
fi
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 21:14, Rafael Osuna wrote:
>
> There should be a 4.3 version of the xlibs-pic package.
xlibs-pic has been renamed to xlibs-static-pic in experimental.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs
> > Package: xlibs
> > Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v3
> > Severity: normal
> >=20
> > xlibs-pic package (4.2.1-11) needs xlibs 4.2.1-11 but the version I
> > have installes (the newest one in the experimental source) is
> > 4.3.0-1pre1v3. So, I can't install xlibs-pic, nor kdesdk.=20
>
> You will have to
Accepted:
lbxproxy_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
libdps1_4.3
ROSEMARY WILLIAMS.
UNION BANK PLC.
NO: 104 MARINA ROAD
LAGOS-ISLAND
NIGERIA
E-MAIL ADDRES:
Dear Friend,
My name is Rosemary williams, a staff in my bank. I have this urgent
deal
to transact with you if you can do it. There is an unclaimed deposited
fund of $15 Million in the name of Smith Shaw wit
Hi !
I hope, you are the maintainer of the libxcursor-dev package.
I have some problems installing this package on my system. I'm using a debian sid
system with X 4.3 from apt-get.org.
Here are the messages, I get from apt if I try to install it.
debian:/home/tom# apt-get -f install
Reading Pa
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
Microsoft Customer
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2002, Cumulative Patch" update which fixes
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Ex
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2003 13:01:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#213978: Dependency problems xlibs/xlibs-pic
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:27:13PM +0200, Frank Stoel wrote:
> Package: XFree86
> Version: 4.1.0.1
>
> Dear Branden,
> Sorry for bothering you so much with this, but something must have gone
> wrong copying the file to my Mail system.
> Attached are the correct files as they are on the DELL machin
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:09:21AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > It appears that this combination just flat out isn't supported.
>
> Which makes perfect sense since the us layout doesn't have any dead
> keys. I guess we could solve this in two ways, a statement in README
> or a graceful failov
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:48:14PM -0400, Debian Installer wrote:
>
>
>
> ===
>
> If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
> override file requires editing, reply to this email.
Uh, I *assume* 0pre1v2 was rejected because it required overrides
updates which have been ren
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 21:14, Rafael Osuna wrote:
>
> There should be a 4.3 version of the xlibs-pic package.
xlibs-pic has been renamed to xlibs-static-pic in experimental.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs
> > Package: xlibs
> > Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v3
> > Severity: normal
> >=20
> > xlibs-pic package (4.2.1-11) needs xlibs 4.2.1-11 but the version I
> > have installes (the newest one in the experimental source) is
> > 4.3.0-1pre1v3. So, I can't install xlibs-pic, nor kdesdk.=20
>
> You will have to
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v3
Severity: normal
xlibs-pic package (4.2.1-11) needs xlibs 4.2.1-11 but the version I have
installes (the newest one in the experimental source) is 4.3.0-1pre1v3. So, I
can't install
xlibs-pic, nor kdesdk.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/un
Accepted:
lbxproxy_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-0pre1v3_m68k.deb
libdps1_4.3
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
ROSEMARY WILLIAMS.
UNION BANK PLC.
NO: 104 MARINA ROAD
LAGOS-ISLAND
NIGERIA
E-MAIL ADDRES:
Dear Friend,
My name is Rosemary williams, a staff in my bank. I have this urgent
deal
to transact with you if you can do it. There is an unclaimed deposited
fund of $15 Million in the name of Smith Shaw wit
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2003 13:01:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#213978: Dependency problems xlibs/xlibs-pic
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:27:13PM +0200, Frank Stoel wrote:
> Package: XFree86
> Version: 4.1.0.1
>
> Dear Branden,
> Sorry for bothering you so much with this, but something must have gone
> wrong copying the file to my Mail system.
> Attached are the correct files as they are on the DELL machin
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:09:21AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > It appears that this combination just flat out isn't supported.
>
> Which makes perfect sense since the us layout doesn't have any dead
> keys. I guess we could solve this in two ways, a statement in README
> or a graceful failov
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:48:14PM -0400, Debian Installer wrote:
>
>
>
> ===
>
> If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
> override file requires editing, reply to this email.
Uh, I *assume* 0pre1v2 was rejected because it required overrides
updates which have been ren
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v3
Severity: normal
xlibs-pic package (4.2.1-11) needs xlibs 4.2.1-11 but the version I have installes
(the newest one in the experimental source) is 4.3.0-1pre1v3. So, I can't install
xlibs-pic, nor kdesdk.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/uns
Le ven 03/10/2003 à 09:16, Branden Robinson a écrit :
> > I'm running Garnome 0.27.1 on debian sid+experimental. Everything was
> > hunky-dory until I upgraded from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 -> 4.3.0-0pre1v3. At this
> > point, gnome-session consistently hung on the Gnome2.4 splash screen. I
> > wasn't able to
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rejected: xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-12.1_all.deb file already exists in the
Accepted directory.
Rejected: xfonts-base_4.2.1-12.1_all.deb file already exists in the Accepted
directory.
Rejected: xspecs_4.2.1-12.1_all.deb file already exists in the Accepted
directory.
Rejected: xfonts-scalabl
Le ven 03/10/2003 à 09:16, Branden Robinson a écrit :
> > I'm running Garnome 0.27.1 on debian sid+experimental. Everything was
> > hunky-dory until I upgraded from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 -> 4.3.0-0pre1v3. At this
> > point, gnome-session consistently hung on the Gnome2.4 splash screen. I
> > wasn't able to
Rejected: xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-12.1_all.deb file already exists in the
Accepted directory.
Rejected: xfonts-base_4.2.1-12.1_all.deb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: xspecs_4.2.1-12.1_all.deb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: xfonts-scalable_
Package: xdm
Version: 4.1.0-16
It is not possible to chose an own logo for the login screen via xdm in
/etc/X11/xdm/Xresources. The login widget shows the text only. The
delivered logos (debian.xpm, debianbw.xpm, XFree86.xpm, XFree86bw.xpm)
can be used without any problems.
One may (hopefully)
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 07:03, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
>
> I'm running Garnome 0.27.1 on debian sid+experimental. Everything was
> hunky-dory until I upgraded from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 -> 4.3.0-0pre1v3. At this
> point, gnome-session consistently hung on the Gnome2.4 splash screen. I
> wasn't able to pull a
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Dear Branden,
Sorry for bothering you so much with this, but something must have gone
wrong copying the file to my Mail system.
Attached are the correct files as they are on the DELL machine. The
Framebuffer is off, but still I have the problem.
Met vriendelijke
Package: xdm
Version: 4.1.0-16
It is not possible to chose an own logo for the login screen via xdm in
/etc/X11/xdm/Xresources. The login widget shows the text only. The
delivered logos (debian.xpm, debianbw.xpm, XFree86.xpm, XFree86bw.xpm)
can be used without any problems.
One may (hopefully)
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 07:03, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
>
> I'm running Garnome 0.27.1 on debian sid+experimental. Everything was
> hunky-dory until I upgraded from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 -> 4.3.0-0pre1v3. At this
> point, gnome-session consistently hung on the Gnome2.4 splash screen. I
> wasn't able to pull a
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Dear Branden,
Sorry for bothering you so much with this, but something must have gone
wrong copying the file to my Mail system.
Attached are the correct files as they are on the DELL machine. The
Framebuffer is off, but still I have the problem.
Met vriendelijke
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:43:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#213029: xserver-xfree86: upgrade switches from PS/2 to
NetscrollPS/2 mouse
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
> It appears that this combination just flat out isn't supported.
Which makes perfect sense since the us layout doesn't have any dead
keys. I guess we could solve this in two ways, a statement in README
or a graceful failover. I'd prefer the latter, of course. It's your
call though.
--
Please do
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 02:40:59 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 625
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs.preinst.in
Log:
Merge changes from revision 624 on trunk (4.2.1-12.1 NMU).
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
==
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 02:34:02 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 624
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xlibs.preinst.in
Log:
Integrate changes from LaMont Jones's NMU.
Un-hork busted logic that used a non-existent shell function to tell the
user about how we're f
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:10:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:50:09PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Package: xlibs
> > Version: 4.2.1-12
> > Severity: grave
Thanks to LaMont Jones, a fix for this has already been NMUed. So you
guys can settle down now.
--
G. Branden
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:31:45AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:35:42PM -0400, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Changed-By: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Description:
> > lbxproxy - Low Bandwidth X (LBX) proxy server
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:33:25AM -0500, Dan DeVries wrote:
> I'm running sid with xfree86 4.2.1-11 and I look at a blank screen
> for the machine. The machine is running, so I ssh into it do some
> checking to find out XFree86 is using 99% of my CPU with a priority
> of -10. I guess my
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:11:05AM +0500, Michail Rusinov wrote:
> Hello, Debian X Strike Force.
>
>I've a question about XFree86 4.3.0. I want to build it for Testing
> distribution, but it's sources build-depends on cpp-3.2, and
> conflicts with gcc-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.2-0pre1). But I've
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:03:14PM -0600, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
> I haven't noticed any particularly similar reports, so I thought I would
> check here.
>
> I'm running Garnome 0.27.1 on debian sid+experimental. Everything was
> hunky-dory until I upgraded from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 -> 4.3.0-0pre1v3. At
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 08:54:50AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I don't know how, but the last ugrade from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 to 4.3.0-0pre1v3
> wiped out the X config file on my office PC completely. I saw some debconf
> menus asking me for my preferred screensize, refresh rate, and whe
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 01:25:23 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 623
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
Further update; m68k is now (nominally) all set.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
===
---
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-10-03 01:23:51 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 621
Added:
people/daniel/sdk/
people/daniel/sdk/debian/
people/daniel/sdk/debian/TODO
people/daniel/sdk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_sdk.diff
Removed:
people/daniel/sdk/debian/TODO
Log:
Added p/d/
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:43:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#213029: xserver-xfree86: upgrade switches from PS/2 to
NetscrollPS/2 mouse
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
> It appears that this combination just flat out isn't supported.
Which makes perfect sense since the us layout doesn't have any dead
keys. I guess we could solve this in two ways, a statement in README
or a graceful failover. I'd prefer the latter, of course. It's your
call though.
--
Please do
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 01:13:49 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 620
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
Log:
Unfuck a fuckup that I made when merging changes from 4.2.1-12.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
===
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 01:05:03 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 619
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/scripts/manifest-install-reconcile
Log:
Practically rewritten. Basically works more intelligently. I'll spare you
the details since this is an XSF-visible-only change. It
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:50:09PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 4.2.1-12
> Severity: grave
>
> Please look at
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=icewm&ver=1.2.13-2&arch=s390&stamp=1065108989&file=log&as=raw
>
> or
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=i
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> There is a tool called "mdetect" (in a package of the same name) that is
> used by the xserver-xfree86 configuration script for this purpose.
> ...
> Well, if the problem comes and goes depending on which version of the
> kernel is running, yes, I'd be
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-10-03 00:52:45 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 618
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
update the TODO:
+ get it up to speed with the current m68k situation, add sh[34] note for
both its users
+ note that I'm working on the sdk in p/d/sdk
Mod
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 02:40:59 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 625
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs.preinst.in
Log:
Merge changes from revision 624 on trunk (4.2.1-12.1 NMU).
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
==
Author: branden
Date: 2003-10-03 02:34:02 -0500 (Fri, 03 Oct 2003)
New Revision: 624
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xlibs.preinst.in
Log:
Integrate changes from LaMont Jones's NMU.
Un-hork busted logic that used a non-existent shell function to tell the
user about how we're f
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:10:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:50:09PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Package: xlibs
> > Version: 4.2.1-12
> > Severity: grave
Thanks to LaMont Jones, a fix for this has already been NMUed. So you
guys can settle down now.
--
G. Branden
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:31:45AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:35:42PM -0400, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Changed-By: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Description:
> > lbxproxy - Low Bandwidth X (LBX) proxy server
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:33:25AM -0500, Dan DeVries wrote:
> I'm running sid with xfree86 4.2.1-11 and I look at a blank screen
> for the machine. The machine is running, so I ssh into it do some
> checking to find out XFree86 is using 99% of my CPU with a priority
> of -10. I guess my
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:11:05AM +0500, Michail Rusinov wrote:
> Hello, Debian X Strike Force.
>
>I've a question about XFree86 4.3.0. I want to build it for Testing
> distribution, but it's sources build-depends on cpp-3.2, and
> conflicts with gcc-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.2-0pre1). But I've
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:03:14PM -0600, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
> I haven't noticed any particularly similar reports, so I thought I would
> check here.
>
> I'm running Garnome 0.27.1 on debian sid+experimental. Everything was
> hunky-dory until I upgraded from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 -> 4.3.0-0pre1v3. At
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 08:54:50AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I don't know how, but the last ugrade from 4.3.0-0pre1v1 to 4.3.0-0pre1v3
> wiped out the X config file on my office PC completely. I saw some debconf
> menus asking me for my preferred screensize, refresh rate, and whe
74 matches
Mail list logo
