Processed: reassign 199537 to xserver-xfree86

2003-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 199537 xserver-xfree86 Bug#199537: Debian GNU/linux 3.0 Warning: Unknown package 'gnu/linux' Warning: Unknown package 'debian' Warning: Unknown package '3.0' Bug reassigned from package `gnu/linux debian 3.0 , woody' to `xserver-xfree86'. > En

SENDER ! Virus found in message from you !

2003-07-01 Thread antywir
Wyslales wirusa na adres [EMAIL PROTECTED] !!! You sent to user [EMAIL PROTECTED] message with VIRUS . == KAV Report: == your_details.ziparchive: ZIP your_details.zip/details.pifpacked: PE_Patch your_details.zip/det

Processed: reassign 199537 to xserver-xfree86

2003-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 199537 xserver-xfree86 Bug#199537: Debian GNU/linux 3.0 Warning: Unknown package 'gnu/linux' Warning: Unknown package 'debian' Warning: Unknown package '3.0' Bug reassigned from package `gnu/linux debian 3.0 , woody' to `xserver-xfree86'. > En

Bug#158198: [nemesis@icequake.net: shouldn't matter] (Bug #158198)

2003-07-01 Thread Ryan Underwood
Hi Branden, Michel, On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:43:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I'm not sure what's going on here, but, Michel, if you're going to close > bugs, please be prepared to follow-up with the submitter if they > re-raise the issue. :) I was an idiot -- the bug was not close

SENDER ! Virus found in message from you !

2003-07-01 Thread antywir
Wyslales wirusa na adres [EMAIL PROTECTED] !!! You sent to user [EMAIL PROTECTED] message with VIRUS . == KAV Report: == your_details.ziparchive: ZIP your_details.zip/details.pifpacked: PE_Patch your_details.zip/det

Bug#158198: [nemesis@icequake.net: shouldn't matter] (Bug #158198)

2003-07-01 Thread Ryan Underwood
Hi Branden, Michel, On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:43:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I'm not sure what's going on here, but, Michel, if you're going to close > bugs, please be prepared to follow-up with the submitter if they > re-raise the issue. :) I was an idiot -- the bug was not close