Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-20 21:04:44 -0500 (Fri, 20 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 225
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
changelog: eek, reverse leakage from ~/debian/xfree86 to ~/debian/xfree86-svn.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
=
As of yesterday, you need Subversion 0.24.2 or greater to access the
repository. If you have a lesser version, you *will* get "Malformed
network data" on certain operations (mainly commit IIRC).
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a de
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-20 20:23:54 -0500 (Fri, 20 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 224
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_savage_driver_1.1.27t.diff
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
patch #063: add new Savage driver, closing about 18 bugs.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-20 21:04:44 -0500 (Fri, 20 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 225
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
changelog: eek, reverse leakage from ~/debian/xfree86 to ~/debian/xfree86-svn.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
=
As of yesterday, you need Subversion 0.24.2 or greater to access the
repository. If you have a lesser version, you *will* get "Malformed
network data" on certain operations (mainly commit IIRC).
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a de
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-20 20:23:54 -0500 (Fri, 20 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 224
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/063_savage_driver_1.1.27t.diff
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
patch #063: add new Savage driver, closing about 18 bugs.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/
Author: branden
Date: 2003-06-20 17:11:54 -0500 (Fri, 20 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 223
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.ia64
branches/4.3.0/sid/deb
Author: branden
Date: 2003-06-20 17:11:54 -0500 (Fri, 20 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 223
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.ia64
branches/4.3.0/sid/deb
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 00:15, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems like the binary driver I got from VIA doesn't fit well with the
> package.
> This driver is supposed to work for Red-Hat 8.0 so I guess there's an
> incompatibility somewhere. Red-Hat 8.0 uses XFree 4.2 and a different
> gcc. Th
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 00:15, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems like the binary driver I got from VIA doesn't fit well with the
> package.
> This driver is supposed to work for Red-Hat 8.0 so I guess there's an
> incompatibility somewhere. Red-Hat 8.0 uses XFree 4.2 and a different
> gcc. Th
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 06:22, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi all,
> The following is a list of the things *I* think still need to be done
> for 4.3.0-0pre1v1. It should not be considered an official XSF document,
> or anything of the sort. If anyone has any comments, please add them.
* drop xlibmes
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 16:42, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:12:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 03:08:44PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 14:51, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Michel D?nzer w
On Friday 20 June 2003 02:25 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:57:56AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff
> > to the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful
> > patch manipulation utiliti
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 06:22, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi all,
> The following is a list of the things *I* think still need to be done
> for 4.3.0-0pre1v1. It should not be considered an official XSF document,
> or anything of the sort. If anyone has any comments, please add them.
* drop xlibmes
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 16:42, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:12:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 03:08:44PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 14:51, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Michel D?nzer w
On Friday 20 June 2003 02:25 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:57:56AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff
> > to the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful
> > patch manipulation utiliti
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 08:33:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Scanpci -v output attached, as suggested by XFree86 -configure.
Whats the process by which this gets into debian XFree86?
First off, try picking i810, not ati. Secondly, it will be in XFree86
4.3.0, a
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:36:32PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 08:33:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >>Scanpci -v output attached, as suggested by XFree86 -configure.
> >>
> >>Whats the process by which this gets into debian XFree86?
> >
> >Firs
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 08:33:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Scanpci -v output attached, as suggested by XFree86 -configure.
>
> Whats the process by which this gets into debian XFree86?
First off, try picking i810, not ati. Secondly, it will be in XFree86
4.3.0, a pre-release of which is op
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-8
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Scanpci -v output attached, as suggested by XFree86 -configure.
Whats the process by which this gets into debian XFree86?
Cheers,
Rob
-- Package-specific info:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82845G/GL [B
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 08:33:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Scanpci -v output attached, as suggested by XFree86 -configure.
Whats the process by which this gets into debian XFree86?
First off, try picking i810, not ati. Secondly, it will be in XFree86
4.3.0, a pre-
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:36:32PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 08:33:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >>Scanpci -v output attached, as suggested by XFree86 -configure.
> >>
> >>Whats the process by which this gets into debian XFree86?
> >
> >Firs
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 08:33:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Scanpci -v output attached, as suggested by XFree86 -configure.
>
> Whats the process by which this gets into debian XFree86?
First off, try picking i810, not ati. Secondly, it will be in XFree86
4.3.0, a pre-release of which is op
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 196379 -1
Bug#196379: menu: User can't remove menu entry with empty $HOME/.menu/package
file
Bug 196379 cloned as bug 198173.
> retitle 196379 twm don't honor ~/.menu
Bug#196379: menu: User can't remove menu entry with empty $HOME/.menu/package
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-8
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Scanpci -v output attached, as suggested by XFree86 -configure.
Whats the process by which this gets into debian XFree86?
Cheers,
Rob
-- Package-specific info:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82845G/GL [Brook
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:57:56AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff to
> the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful patch
> manipulation utilities that don't seem to be available in the version in the
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 196379 -1
Bug#196379: menu: User can't remove menu entry with empty $HOME/.menu/package file
Bug 196379 cloned as bug 198173.
> retitle 196379 twm don't honor ~/.menu
Bug#196379: menu: User can't remove menu entry with empty $HOME/.menu/package f
Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff to
the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful patch
manipulation utilities that don't seem to be available in the version in the
X packages.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:57:56AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff to
> the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful patch
> manipulation utilities that don't seem to be available in the version in the
>
Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff to
the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful patch
manipulation utilities that don't seem to be available in the version in the
X packages.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
30 matches
Mail list logo
