Greetings admirable fellas,
I'm kinda new to this list and XFree86 packages so please bare with my
ignorance.
I have a few questions about XF86, patches and 4.3 packages:
- Is 4.3.0pre1v1 available from somewhere? I would very much like
to test.
- Is the infamous KDE logout bug found in ds4
[Not replying to JWZ since, despite accompanying it with bile, he did
respect my request for no further private mail. I'll just address a
couple of points for the benefit of bystanders on debian-x.]
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:57:04PM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote:
> What is your fascination with no
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:43:17PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> If this is indeed a Trio32, as it semes it is, it should be supported in
> 4.2.1-6
I believe you are wrong. You can see a record of a prior discussion at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree-xpert&m=103724413025211.
The origina
Daniel Stone writes:
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:54:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1) Should libstdc++-dev dependencies be made "artificially" strict in
> > packages destined for sid so that it's harder for packages built
> > against, say, libstdc++3 to accidentally sneak in and start reg
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> If you read the message through a mail->news gateway, please identify
> which one to the debian-x mailing list, since it is obviously obscuring
> the source of the message and possibly other important information as
> well.
Well, you know, I was *going* to go search fo
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3.bunk.4
Severity: minor
Hi,
i wrote myself a utility daemon, that has to work only in certain
display resolutions (it centers the viewport to a certain window).
To check that, it repeatedly calls XF86VidModeGetModeLine(), every
couple of seconds.
Every ti
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:01:27PM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > [There was no need to mail me privately about this; the debian-x mailing
> > list is a perfectly reasonable forum for such queries.]
>
> I'm not on the debian-x mailing list, nor was I even aware it
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:40:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Damn son, just rip out the rationale and credit, why don'tcha.
>
> Is this retaliation for the changelog-ectomy I performed? :)
Sorry, that whole commit went horribly wrong - I think I did it all in
reverse, ugh. Please feel fre
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 16:29:48 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 79
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
FTBFS from Bdale on ia64.
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
==
--- people/daniel/STATUS2003-0
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:54:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1) Should libstdc++-dev dependencies be made "artificially" strict in
> packages destined for sid so that it's harder for packages built
> against, say, libstdc++3 to accidentally sneak in and start regressing
> the C++ ABI transit
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:56:16AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > 3) Bug porters.
>
> I'd very much like to have port specialists as part of the "committing
> team".
NetBSD/i386 present and accounted for. First pass at 4.3.0 b
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 16:23:55 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 78
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
Responses from arm, bsd, mips, m68k, s390, and more!
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
==
--- people/
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:35:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:36:35AM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote:
> > You wrote:
> > >
> > > - * debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xineramify_xscreensaver.diff
> > > (new):
> > > -+ New patch from XFree86 HEAD to add Xinerama
Branden Robinson writes:
> Questions for debian-{x,devel}:
>
> 1) Should libstdc++-dev dependencies be made "artificially" strict in
> packages destined for sid so that it's harder for packages built
> against, say, libstdc++3 to accidentally sneak in and start regressing
> the C++ ABI transition
Author: branden
Date: 2003-05-26 15:09:58 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 77
Modified:
trunk/changelog
Log:
bump changelog date again
Modified: trunk/changelog
==
--- trunk/changelog 2003-05-26 20:07:51 UTC
Author: branden
Date: 2003-05-26 15:07:51 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 76
Modified:
trunk/patches/500_s390_support.diff
Log:
Fix offsets due to deletion of patch #454.
Modified: trunk/patches/500_s390_support.diff
=
[There was no need to mail me privately about this; the debian-x mailing
list is a perfectly reasonable forum for such queries.]
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:36:35AM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote:
> You wrote:
> >
> > - * debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xineramify_xscreensaver.diff (new):
> > -
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: grave
Using XFree86 4.1.0-16, the display board works and produces the expected
output. Using XFree86 4.2.1-6, the display is corrupted: some parts of the
desktop are written at their expected place, most aren't.
The system usually runs 3 displa
Author: branden
Date: 2003-05-26 14:03:36 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 75
Removed:
trunk/patches/454_ia64_no_int10.diff
trunk/patches/999_really_shut_off_int10.diff
Modified:
trunk/changelog
Log:
trash patches #454 and #999; the former causes a FTBFS on IA-64 because the X
serv
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:48:23AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Author: daniel
> Date: 2003-05-26 08:48:12 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
> New Revision: 69
>
> Modified:
>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
> Log:
> Changed references to libstdc++5-dev to libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev,
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:57:18PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:25:54PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> If this is indeed a Trio32, as it semes it is, it should be supported in
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:55:01AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Author: daniel
> Date: 2003-05-26 02:54:43 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
> New Revision: 59
>
> Modified:
>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff
> Log:
> Update #910 per Branden's trunk update, which shoul
Author: branden
Date: 2003-05-26 13:42:25 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 74
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff
Log:
restore patch description and credit, not like I should *want* to take credit
for this stone tool of a patch
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:44:30PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> >> Cool. At some point soon I'll initialize a repo for this. Please nag
> >> if I'm not moving fast enough.
>
> No problem :-)
>
> Perhaps I can not have enough time to work for X because I'm very
> very busy on my real job s
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: important
The X server dies with signal 11 if I first runs mozilla
reading a webpage or two, and then tries to
start an xterm / rxvt from the menu/toolbar in icewm.
Selecting xterm just once doesn't usually crash,
but it takes several minutes of
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-05-26 11:56:34 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 73
Modified:
people/ishikawa/4.3.0-0pre1v1-xrender-xcursor-split/MANIFEST.i386
people/ishikawa/4.3.0-0pre1v1-xrender-xcursor-split/changelog
people/ishikawa/4.3.0-0pre1v1-xrender-xcursor-split/control
pe
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-05-26 10:40:41 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 72
Added:
people/ishikawa/4.3.0-0pre1v1-xrender-xcursor-split/
Modified:
people/ishikawa/TODO
Log:
update TODO
creating lib{Xrender,Xcursor} spliting test branch
Copied: people/ishikawa/4.3.0-0pre1v1-xrender
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Serverity: wishlist
* Package name: xcursor
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Keith Packard
* URL : http://fontconfig.org/release/
* License :
Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and its
documentati
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 08:51:48 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 71
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
And for my next trick, I'll get my timezone right!
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
==
--- people/da
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 08:50:20 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 70
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
Update changelog to close #139817 and #194136 - these actually close bugs, so
they should be changelogged, AFAICS.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelo
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 08:48:12 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 69
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
Log:
Changed references to libstdc++5-dev to libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, allowing
libstdc++5-3.3-dev to satisfy the dependency, and thus gcc3.2 to be deleted.
(clos
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 139817 pending
Bug#139817: xfree86: wanted: dri-source package to build kernel modules with
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 08:28:10 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 68
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
Karsten Merker responded for mips{,el}.
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
==
--- people/daniel/STATUS
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 08:06:14 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 66
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
Clarify build status for alpha/i386/powerpc.
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
==
--- people/daniel/S
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 08:09:50 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 67
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
waldi responded to s390 ping.
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
==
--- people/daniel/STATUS20
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 08:01:33 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 65
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
I pinged all the porters tonight, and I've added the status of all the ports wrt
answering pings, how far along the port is, etc, to STATUS, which probably means
this file will
On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 14:00, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:11:27PM +0200, Fernando Sancho wrote:
> > I need to enable PEX support un XFree, but I am really newbie in debian
> > package building.
>
> Notice that, if i am not wrong, PEX and some other stuff is considered
> obsolet
(Due to the list software, I have to send a separate message to every
list, more or less. Ah well).
Hi guys!
You're getting this mail because your architecture (arm, m68k, mips,
mipsel, sh[34], *bsd, x86-64) doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0. As you
may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 07:06:37 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 64
Removed:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibmesa-dri.install.hppa
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xserver-xfree86.docs.hppa
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xserver-xfree86.install.hppa
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xutils.in
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:25:54PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:21:11PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> >> > I have tried debian-user and xfree86 but didn't got a reply.
> >> > Hopeful
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:25:54PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> If this is indeed a Trio32, as it semes it is, it should be supported in
> >> 4.2.1-6, which is currently in sid (unstable).
>
> I believe that XF
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:11:27PM +0200, Fernando Sancho wrote:
> I need to enable PEX support un XFree, but I am really newbie in debian
> package building.
Notice that, if i am not wrong, PEX and some other stuff is considered
obsolet by XFree86, and will probably be removed altogether in the f
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:21:11PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
>> > I have tried debian-user and xfree86 but didn't got a reply.
>> > Hopefully someone here will be able to help. In addition, maybe others
>> > with th
It worked. Thank's a lot!!
El lun, 26 de 05 de 2003 a las 12:41, Daniel Stone escribió:
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:11:27PM +0200, Fernando Sancho wrote:
> > I need to enable PEX support un XFree, but I am really newbie in debian
> > package building.
> >
> > In an early mail to Branden Robinso
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:21:11PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> I have tried debian-user and xfree86 but didn't got a reply.
> Hopefully someone here will be able to help. In addition, maybe others
> with the same old card can tell whether it works for them?
> The following is for an old machine
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:11:27PM +0200, Fernando Sancho wrote:
> I need to enable PEX support un XFree, but I am really newbie in debian
> package building.
>
> In an early mail to Branden Robinson (sorry Branden), i have detailed
> the steps followed.
>
> 1) apt-get source xserver-xfree86
> 2)
I have tried debian-user and xfree86 but didn't got a reply.
Hopefully someone here will be able to help. In addition, maybe others
with the same old card can tell whether it works for them?
The following is for an old machine that is being used as a desk top.
It used to follow testing rather
I need to enable PEX support un XFree, but I am really newbie in debian
package building.
In an early mail to Branden Robinson (sorry Branden), i have detailed
the steps followed.
1) apt-get source xserver-xfree86
2) cd xfree86-4.2.1/upstream/archive/
3) tar zxvf xfree86-4.2.1.tar.gz
4) cd xc/con
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 04:53:26 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 62
Removed:
people/daniel/debian/
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
Nuked my debian/ dir, as it got moved to branches/4.3.0/sid/debian, and updated
the STATUS file with what I plan to do now, although I probabl
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:44:30PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Perhaps I can not have enough time to work for X because I'm very
> very busy on my real job since 1st week of Jun, sorry.
Sadly, my free time runs out about this week, until exams in 3 weeks
have finished. After that, I've got 2
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 04:13:18 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 61
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff
Log:
Fix line numbers, et al.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 02:56:57 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 60
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-dev.links
Log:
Add libXrandr.so to xlibs-dev.links, so apps will build against the .so, not the
.a - thanks Simon Hausmann!
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-de
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 02:54:43 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 59
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff
Log:
Update #910 per Branden's trunk update, which should get it building properly
with gcc3.3 again (get rid of multi-line string literals).
Mo
Author: branden
Date: 2003-05-26 02:41:37 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 58
Added:
trunk/patches/999_really_shut_off_int10.diff
Removed:
trunk/patches/999_really_shut_off_into10.diff
Log:
fix typo in filename
Copied: trunk/patches/999_really_shut_off_int10.diff (from rev 57,
trunk/
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:39:55AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > - Xcursor package will be ITPd as soon as possible.
>> > (Maintainer: X Strike force, Uploader Branden, Daniel and me).
>>
>> No point h
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-05-26 01:53:23 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 57
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_int10.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/021_riscpc_ioport_fix.diff
Log:
Fixed up the int10 patch from HEAD and the RISC ioport patch to act
Author: branden
Date: 2003-05-26 01:52:46 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 56
Modified:
trunk/changelog
Log:
bump changelog date
Modified: trunk/changelog
==
--- trunk/changelog 2003-05-26 06:46:08 UTC (rev 5
Author: branden
Date: 2003-05-26 01:46:08 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003)
New Revision: 55
Modified:
trunk/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff
Log:
gcc 3.3 doesn't like multiline string literals; fix them
Modified: trunk/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:56:16AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:49:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1) Release 4.2.1-7 (it was on, then it was off, now it's on again). See
> > http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/changelog?rev=44&content-type=te
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:41:32AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Is it worth maintaining these packages (Xft, Xcursor, et al) under SVN
> as well?
Go here:
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/
and click the little clickety thing under "Project Root" and to the left
of "Go".
--
G.
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:39:55AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> - Xcursor package will be ITPd as soon as possible.
> (Maintainer: X Strike force, Uploader Branden, Daniel and me).
No point having Daniel in the Uploaders field until he is a Debian
Developer.
> There is beta package:
61 matches
Mail list logo
