Daniel Stone writes: > On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:54:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > 1) Should libstdc++-dev dependencies be made "artificially" strict in > > packages destined for sid so that it's harder for packages built > > against, say, libstdc++3 to accidentally sneak in and start regressing > > the C++ ABI transition progress? > > Well, this isn't a problem for buildds, because I made libstdc++5-dev > the preference.
for this to work, you have to explicitely build using g++-3.2 (build dependency and setting of CC/CXX). using g++ means building with libstdc++5-3.3-dev.
