Branden Robinson wrote:
>>hmm, I had the same problem - with [EMAIL PROTECTED] set in
>>/etc/environment at least. Installing the -transcoded packages
>>fixed this. (of course, the transcoded fonts *are* useful in this
>>case)
> Yes, the -transcoded packages are important for people using
> char
I have a few binary applications that exhibit the
problem with ISO10646 fonts (fonts appear as little
gray boxes). I read the FAQ, but there is no suggested
solution or even a hack to fix the problem. The
programs are not open source and there are no updated
versions. So, how can I get rid of the l
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 22:33, Nathan P. Maier wrote:
> First I tried to get the PCI card to work with the Gatos "ati.2"
> driver.
> They say that Dpkg and RPM both install the Xfree86 in unique places.
> Their drivers are based on 4.1.99. Does anybody know of a way to install
> the "ati.
Branden Robinson wrote:
>>hmm, I had the same problem - with LANG=de_DE@euro set in
>>/etc/environment at least. Installing the -transcoded packages
>>fixed this. (of course, the transcoded fonts *are* useful in this
>>case)
> Yes, the -transcoded packages are important for people using
>
I have a few binary applications that exhibit the
problem with ISO10646 fonts (fonts appear as little
gray boxes). I read the FAQ, but there is no suggested
solution or even a hack to fix the problem. The
programs are not open source and there are no updated
versions. So, how can I get rid of the
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 22:33, Nathan P. Maier wrote:
> First I tried to get the PCI card to work with the Gatos "ati.2" driver.
> They say that Dpkg and RPM both install the Xfree86 in unique places.
> Their drivers are based on 4.1.99. Does anybody know of a way to install
> the "ati.2"
First I tried to get the PCI card to work with the Gatos "ati.2"
driver.
They say that Dpkg and RPM both install the Xfree86 in unique places.
Their drivers are based on 4.1.99. Does anybody know of a way to install
the "ati.2" project while using the debian installation of XFree86x tha
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020510 11:17]:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> > Does anyone have any input about what is going on here? Did RedHat
> > backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms? Or is something
> > wrong with what I am doing?
First I tried to get the PCI card to work with the Gatos "ati.2" driver.
They say that Dpkg and RPM both install the Xfree86 in unique places.
Their drivers are based on 4.1.99. Does anybody know of a way to install
the "ati.2" project while using the debian installation of XFree86x tha
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020510 11:17]:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> > Does anyone have any input about what is going on here? Did RedHat
> > backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms? Or is something
> > wrong with what I am doing?
Thanks Branden!
That did it!
-Bryan
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> It may also be possible to get the "ati" driver working with you card
> even under 4.1 by specifying the ChipId of a similar supported chipset
> in your XF86Config-4 file.
--
Bryan K. Walt
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> Does anyone have any input about what is going on here? Did RedHat
> backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms? Or is something
> wrong with what I am doing?
Red Hat's 4.1 RPMs are at least as hacked up as our Debian pac
Quick question. From what I can tell, the ATI Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF AGP
video card is not supported by X 4.1.0. It looks like 4.1 was released
in June of 2001 and this card was not officially supported by the
XFree86 team until July of 2001. I assume that the 4.2 package supports
this card.
The
Thanks Branden!
That did it!
-Bryan
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> It may also be possible to get the "ati" driver working with you card
> even under 4.1 by specifying the ChipId of a similar supported chipset
> in your XF86Config-4 file.
--
Bryan K. Wal
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> Does anyone have any input about what is going on here? Did RedHat
> backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms? Or is something
> wrong with what I am doing?
Red Hat's 4.1 RPMs are at least as hacked up as our Debian pa
Quick question. From what I can tell, the ATI Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF AGP
video card is not supported by X 4.1.0. It looks like 4.1 was released
in June of 2001 and this card was not officially supported by the
XFree86 team until July of 2001. I assume that the 4.2 package supports
this card.
Th
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:27:16AM +0200, Malte Cornils wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:36:51PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> >
> >>Is there a way to get twm or fvwm start without -transcoded?
> >
> >
> >Yes; I do it all the time.
>
> hmm, I had the same problem - wi
17 matches
Mail list logo
