Hi... (disclaimer: I'm still a bit of a newbie in this area, so please
be gentle :) What I did today:
1. Installed Potato on workstation (clean partitions, just essential
packages).
2. Set up sources.list to point to "unstable" branch, did "apt-get
dist-upgrade", handled a few problems, bl
Hi... (disclaimer: I'm still a bit of a newbie in this area, so please
be gentle :) What I did today:
1. Installed Potato on workstation (clean partitions, just essential
packages).
2. Set up sources.list to point to "unstable" branch, did "apt-get
dist-upgrade", handled a few problems, b
Philip Blundell wrote:
Nope, failed again, different error (MANIFEST check failed). I'm afraid
I've run out of time to debug, but if someone sends a patch I'd be glad
to start another build.
MANIFEST checks don't usually need much debugging. You just need to look over
the diff to make su
Philip Blundell wrote:
>>Nope, failed again, different error (MANIFEST check failed). I'm afraid
>>I've run out of time to debug, but if someone sends a patch I'd be glad
>>to start another build.
>>
>
>MANIFEST checks don't usually need much debugging. You just need to look over
>the diff t
>Nope, failed again, different error (MANIFEST check failed). I'm afraid
>I've run out of time to debug, but if someone sends a patch I'd be glad
>to start another build.
MANIFEST checks don't usually need much debugging. You just need to look over
the diff to make sure that it all seems reas
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
It's building now with the patch put in as
debian/patches/999_z_arm_pci.diff (you'll probably give it a different
number, or merge it with another patch?), log-in-progress at
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/xfree86_4.1.0-0pre1v5b.log .
Nope, failed again, different
>Nope, failed again, different error (MANIFEST check failed). I'm afraid
>I've run out of time to debug, but if someone sends a patch I'd be glad
>to start another build.
MANIFEST checks don't usually need much debugging. You just need to look over
the diff to make sure that it all seems rea
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> It's building now with the patch put in as
> debian/patches/999_z_arm_pci.diff (you'll probably give it a different
> number, or merge it with another patch?), log-in-progress at
> http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/xfree86_4.1.0-0pre1v5b.log .
Nope, failed again, dif
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:54:55AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> The second problem is more difficult. xf86WriteMmio32Be is
> undefined in MIPS and is implemented under other archs in
> assembly which I'm not sure what to do with. xf86WriteMmio32Be
> is used in atimach64.c
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 03:38:44AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > > Ryan Murray reported to me that a 4.1 compile on mips fails.
> >
> > This is an update to this issue.
> >
> > After adding another parameter to RANGE ('0' for p
Branden, do you think you could package up the DRI sources in a way
that could be easily compiled and installed with make-kpkg. ALSA does
somthing like that. It would be helpful and neat. :)
--Warren
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 05:56, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Warren Turkal wr
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:54:55AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> The second problem is more difficult. xf86WriteMmio32Be is
> undefined in MIPS and is implemented under other archs in
> assembly which I'm not sure what to do with. xf86WriteMmio32Be
> is used in atimach64.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 03:38:44AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > > Ryan Murray reported to me that a 4.1 compile on mips fails.
> >
> > This is an update to this issue.
> >
> > After adding another parameter to RANGE ('0' for
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Ryan Murray reported to me that a 4.1 compile on mips fails.
>
> This is an update to this issue.
>
> After adding another parameter to RANGE ('0' for pci domain) and
> attempting to compile I ran into a few other problems. First
Branden, do you think you could package up the DRI sources in a way
that could be easily compiled and installed with make-kpkg. ALSA does
somthing like that. It would be helpful and neat. :)
--Warren
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 05:56, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Warren Turkal w
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [I do not subscribe to debian-mips; please include debian-x when replying.]
>
> Ryan Murray reported to me that a 4.1 compile on mips fails.
This is an update to this issue.
After adding another parameter to RANGE ('0' for pci domai
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Ryan Murray reported to me that a 4.1 compile on mips fails.
>
> This is an update to this issue.
>
> After adding another parameter to RANGE ('0' for pci domain) and
> attempting to compile I ran into a few other problems. First
17 matches
Mail list logo
