>> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Like Zeph said, though, the packages are most useful in source
> *because* you can use different libGL implementations to compile
> them. As I understand it (and I'm probably wrong), libGL
> implementations vary in the DRI project from one famil
>> "Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For instance gears is a /very/ standard benchmark
Yes, I know, I'm hand picking a few of the programs to provide them as
binaries... gears is, well, something someone early on picked as a
benchmark because it's fillrate bound (more accurat
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 04:33:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.3-0pre1v1 available for testing
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
> Mail-Copies-To: nobody
>
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:38:18PM -0700, Jon Pennington wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > >> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
> >
> > Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
>
> It looked that w
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:17:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> As of this writing only i386 is available. I'm working on powerpc and
> sparc for v2.
Hrm, forgot to mention this part:
deb http://people.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/$(ARCH)/
deb-src http://people.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/s
>> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Like Zeph said, though, the packages are most useful in source
> *because* you can use different libGL implementations to compile
> them. As I understand it (and I'm probably wrong), libGL
> implementations vary in the DRI project from one fami
As of this writing only i386 is available. I'm working on powerpc and
sparc for v2.
Architecture porters should note that the MANIFEST file for your arch will
need updating (see debian/402-to-403-MANIFEST-change), as will the
*.{dirs,files,links}.$(ARCH) files in some cases. *.files* are no long
>> "Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For instance gears is a /very/ standard benchmark
Yes, I know, I'm hand picking a few of the programs to provide them as
binaries... gears is, well, something someone early on picked as a
benchmark because it's fillrate bound (more accura
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
>
> Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
It looked that way :)
> > Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
>
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 04:33:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.3-0pre1v1 available for testing
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mail-Copies-To: nobody
>
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:17:19PM -
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:38:18PM -0700, Jon Pennington wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > >> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
> >
> > Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
>
> It looked that
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:17:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> As of this writing only i386 is available. I'm working on powerpc and
> sparc for v2.
Hrm, forgot to mention this part:
deb http://people.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/$(ARCH)/
deb-src http://people.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/
As of this writing only i386 is available. I'm working on powerpc and
sparc for v2.
Architecture porters should note that the MANIFEST file for your arch will
need updating (see debian/402-to-403-MANIFEST-change), as will the
*.{dirs,files,links}.$(ARCH) files in some cases. *.files* are no lon
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
>
> Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
It looked that way :)
> > Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
>
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
> > sense. There are too many libGL implementations floating around for
> > that.
>
> Actually, this is a t
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
> > sense. There are too many libGL implementations floating around for
> > that.
>
> Actually, this is a
>> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
> Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
> sense. There are too many libGL implementations floating around for
> that.
Actually, this is a temp
>> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
> Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
> sense. There are too many libGL implementations floating around for
> that.
Actually, this is a tem
Hello,
I have installed the new dri packages, and at last I have 3gl, I am
getting ~100 fps with the evas_test on my g400. but I do have on
problem.
With enlightenment and imlib1 it can't seem to detect the shared memory,
which also seems to cause the latest version of gnome panel crash as
well.
19 matches
Mail list logo
