>> "Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For instance gears is a /very/ standard benchmark
Yes, I know, I'm hand picking a few of the programs to provide them as
binaries... gears is, well, something someone early on picked as a
benchmark because it's fillrate bound (more accurately, at the default
resolution I'm at the border between what my card can do and what my
CPU can do, I guess you can call that luck). texenv is incredibly
useful if you want to check things are ok (or that they behave the way
you think they do). gloss and multiarb are also useful to check things
are ok. At any rate I don't think everything in there is "or general
interest".
If you have more suggestions...
--
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
