[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) writes:
> 2) There is a problem with app-defaults migration. Packages that ship
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults, *but no longer exist* create a file
> overlap. So far I know of only one package fitting that description: xmh
> (part of XFree86 3.3.6).
I had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) writes:
> 2) There is a problem with app-defaults migration. Packages that ship
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults, *but no longer exist* create a file
> overlap. So far I know of only one package fitting that description: xmh
> (part of XFree86 3.3.6).
I ha
First impressions on setting up Debian X stuff [letting off steam]:
XF86Setup: even though one clicks on 800x600 etc. one ends up with
Modes "640x480"
If it is unhappy about color depth combinations, why doesn't it say so
instead of silently overruling the user.
gpm: the way debian
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:23:32PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version,
> > but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you
> > have to build
First impressions on setting up Debian X stuff [letting off steam]:
XF86Setup: even though one clicks on 800x600 etc. one ends up with
Modes "640x480"
If it is unhappy about color depth combinations, why doesn't it say so
instead of silently overruling the user.
gpm: the way debian
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version,
> but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you
> have to build for a while. There will be a 4.0.2-13.
Already built. I'll remove it from incomin
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:10:04PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:03:32PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> >
> > "Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote:
> > >
> > > DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> > > DRI disabled.
> >
> > What kernel are you using?
2.4.2
> Also, did you
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:03:32PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> "Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
> > disabled for me.
> >
> > DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> > DRI disabled.
>
> What kernel are you using?
Also, did y
"Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote:
>
> Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
> disabled for me.
>
> DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> DRI disabled.
What kernel are you using?
Sounds like you have outdated drm modules in your kernel. Zephaniah's
previous message claims
Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
disabled for me.
DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
DRI disabled.
--
Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may be
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:23:32PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version,
> > but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you
> > have to buil
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version,
> but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you
> have to build for a while. There will be a 4.0.2-13.
Already built. I'll remove it from incomi
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:10:04PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:03:32PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> >
> > "Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote:
> > >
> > > DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> > > DRI disabled.
> >
> > What kernel are you using?
2.4.2
> Also, did you
[sorry for the wide CC; please note the Reply-To header]
Predictably, my efforts to create a synchonization point for XFree86 blew
up in my face.
So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version,
but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you
hav
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:03:32PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> "Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
> > disabled for me.
> >
> > DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> > DRI disabled.
>
> What kernel are you using?
Also, did
"Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote:
>
> Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
> disabled for me.
>
> DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> DRI disabled.
What kernel are you using?
Sounds like you have outdated drm modules in your kernel. Zephaniah's
previous message claim
Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
disabled for me.
DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
DRI disabled.
--
Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may
Could you please check that your keymap is consistent with the ones
included in XFree86 4?
Thanks,
Juliusz
Hi all,
There are no lithuanian keymap for XFree 3.3.6 in potato rev.2. I
would like you to include it in potato rev.3. I have working keymap
and I can send it to you. Lithuanian users has many lithuanisation
related problems, becouse there are many lithuanian keymaps which are
not working core
[sorry for the wide CC; please note the Reply-To header]
Predictably, my efforts to create a synchonization point for XFree86 blew
up in my face.
So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version,
but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you
ha
Last night I upgraded packages to X4.0.2-12 (from X4.0.2-11) and overnight,
configure scripts no longer detect XShem.
A source I configured and compiled yesterday doesn't want to configure
today. The sources I'm trying to compile haven't changed, I just did a
dist-upgrade which included the X upgra
Could you please check that your keymap is consistent with the ones
included in XFree86 4?
Thanks,
Juliusz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
There are no lithuanian keymap for XFree 3.3.6 in potato rev.2. I
would like you to include it in potato rev.3. I have working keymap
and I can send it to you. Lithuanian users has many lithuanisation
related problems, becouse there are many lithuanian keymaps which are
not working core
Last night I upgraded packages to X4.0.2-12 (from X4.0.2-11) and overnight,
configure scripts no longer detect XShem.
A source I configured and compiled yesterday doesn't want to configure
today. The sources I'm trying to compile haven't changed, I just did a
dist-upgrade which included the X upgr
24 matches
Mail list logo
