On November 23, 2000 06:38 pm, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > Please don't send mail to Branden directly, questions such as this are
> much better suited for debian-x.
>
> > - Forwarded message from Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > Hi,
> >
> > I do not know if this has been reported as
Please don't send mail to Branden directly, questions such as this are
much better suited for debian-x.
> - Forwarded message from Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> Hi,
>
> I do not know if this has been reported as a bug yet as the
> bugs.debian.org page does not seem to work...
>
>
Yesterday I updated X packages to version 4.0.1-7 and after troublesome
installation (these postinst bugs you know...) I got it running somehow,
but something seems to be severly broken as now I don't seem to be able
to run GNOME-enabled development versions (first 2.3.22, now 2.3.23) of
my favou
On November 23, 2000 06:38 pm, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > Please don't send mail to Branden directly, questions such as this are
> much better suited for debian-x.
>
> > - Forwarded message from Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > Hi,
> >
> > I do not know if this has been reported a
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 07:33:51PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> That's just what the m68k autobuilder mailed me, I pointed it to the
> source in proposed-updates.
>
> > Problem with your build environment?
>
> Afaik kullervo has no problems.
Maybe its the
Please don't send mail to Branden directly, questions such as this are
much better suited for debian-x.
> - Forwarded message from Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> Hi,
>
> I do not know if this has been reported as a bug yet as the
> bugs.debian.org page does not seem to work...
>
>
Yesterday I updated X packages to version 4.0.1-7 and after troublesome
installation (these postinst bugs you know...) I got it running somehow,
but something seems to be severly broken as now I don't seem to be able
to run GNOME-enabled development versions (first 2.3.22, now 2.3.23) of
my favo
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 07:33:51PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> That's just what the m68k autobuilder mailed me, I pointed it to the
> source in proposed-updates.
>
> > Problem with your build environment?
>
> Afaik kullervo has no problems.
Maybe its th
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:58:21AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Don't try to include files that don't exist in Debian packages. :)
> What do you mean? I did not include a thing, after all its your package.
Please read debian/README. Different things get built for different
architectur
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:02:59PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > make[4]: Entering directory
> > `/build/rbuilder/xfree86-1-3.3.6/build-tree/xc/config'
> > /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option `--rapth-link'
> > /usr/bin/ld: use the --help option for usage inf
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:02:59PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/build/rbuilder/xfree86-1-3.3.6/build-tree/xc/config'
> /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option `--rapth-link'
> /usr/bin/ld: use the --help option for usage information
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit statu
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:01:27PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> X has a weird buildsystem.. rbuilder died right at the end:
>
> dpkg-deb: building package `xserver-xsun' in
> `../xserver-xsun_3.3.6-11potato15_sparc.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package `xserver-xsun-mono' in
> `../xserver-xs
- Forwarded message from Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DRI wth 2.2.18pre kernels
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:37:40 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It may be that only XF4 supports this version of the i810 chipset...
There's a patched version of the 3.3.6 X server available at
http://support.intel.com/support/graphics/intel815/linuxsoftware.htm
Simply download the RPM file and convert it with alien to a deb
packag
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:58:21AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Don't try to include files that don't exist in Debian packages. :)
> What do you mean? I did not include a thing, after all its your package.
Please read debian/README. Different things get built for different
architectu
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:02:59PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > make[4]: Entering directory `/build/rbuilder/xfree86-1-3.3.6/build-tree/xc/config'
> > /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option `--rapth-link'
> > /usr/bin/ld: use the --help option for usage informa
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:02:59PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/rbuilder/xfree86-1-3.3.6/build-tree/xc/config'
> /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option `--rapth-link'
> /usr/bin/ld: use the --help option for usage information
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:01:27PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> X has a weird buildsystem.. rbuilder died right at the end:
>
> dpkg-deb: building package `xserver-xsun' in
>`../xserver-xsun_3.3.6-11potato15_sparc.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package `xserver-xsun-mono' in
>`../xserver-xsu
- Forwarded message from Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DRI wth 2.2.18pre kernels
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:37:40 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It may be that only XF4 supports this version of the i810 chipset...
There's a patched version of the 3.3.6 X server available at
http://support.intel.com/support/graphics/intel815/linuxsoftware.htm
Simply download the RPM file and convert it with alien to a deb
packa
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The bit I don't understand is why X worked on 4.0.1-1 but started failing
>> later only when -4 came out (or was it -3 ? ). Isn't it all the same
>> version of X, 4.0.1 ?
No, 4.0.1-1 based on XFree86 4.0.1d, 4.0.1
Two or three weeks ago when X 4.0.1-1 came out, I installed it, and it was
working just fine. This is on a Toshiba 490CDT laptop with an S3 ViRGE/MX
video chipset, with 2.2.18-pre21 (and last week, 2.2.17).
Then, last week, when 4.0.1-4 came out (about the same time as libc6 hit
2.2-1, is there a
> In <20001124004608.F1453@strider>
> Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The bit I don't understand is why X worked on 4.0.1-1 but started failing
>> later only when -4 came out (or was it -3 ? ). Isn't it all the same
>> version of X, 4.0.1 ?
No, 4.0.1-1 based on XFree86 4.
Two or three weeks ago when X 4.0.1-1 came out, I installed it, and it was
working just fine. This is on a Toshiba 490CDT laptop with an S3 ViRGE/MX
video chipset, with 2.2.18-pre21 (and last week, 2.2.17).
Then, last week, when 4.0.1-4 came out (about the same time as libc6 hit
2.2-1, is there
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:19:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Thank you very much for providing these. I'm very glad to see m68k
> rejoining the bleeding-edge-XFree86 fold.
I've been there all the time, but it took me a while to fix all the build
problems.
> > find: usr/lib/libOSMesa.so: No
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 03:46:47AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hmm, something else seems to be missing. I had to create a MANIFEST, copy at
> http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/x4.0/
> but thats still not enough yet:
Got it.
> find: usr/lib/libOSMesa.so: No such file or directo
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:19:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Thank you very much for providing these. I'm very glad to see m68k
> rejoining the bleeding-edge-XFree86 fold.
I've been there all the time, but it took me a while to fix all the build
problems.
> > find: usr/lib/libOSMesa.so: N
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 03:46:47AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hmm, something else seems to be missing. I had to create a MANIFEST, copy at
> http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/x4.0/
> but thats still not enough yet:
Got it.
> find: usr/lib/libOSMesa.so: No such file or direct
28 matches
Mail list logo
