using woody 4.0.1-0phase2v13.
I haven't put these access rules (it showed up when I upgraded to XFree 4.0).
Is this hardcoded or am I missing something ?
> xhost
access control enabled, only authorized clients can connect
INET:localhost
INET:my.host.com
LOCAL:
> xhost -my.host.com
my.host.com bein
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:39:25AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> severity 72041 normal
> severity 72135 normal
> severity 70750 normal
> thanks
>
> These are not release-critical problems. All are in reference to the 3.x
> branch of XFree86, which not actively maintained. Patches for Hurd sup
using woody 4.0.1-0phase2v13.
I haven't put these access rules (it showed up when I upgraded to XFree 4.0).
Is this hardcoded or am I missing something ?
> xhost
access control enabled, only authorized clients can connect
INET:localhost
INET:my.host.com
LOCAL:
> xhost -my.host.com
my.host.com bei
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:39:25AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> severity 72041 normal
> severity 72135 normal
> severity 70750 normal
> thanks
>
> These are not release-critical problems. All are in reference to the 3.x
> branch of XFree86, which not actively maintained. Patches for Hurd su
Chung, (or is it Ha-Nyung?)
I believe the DRI/AGP features require a much newer kernel. If you try
kernel 2.4.0-test*, being sure to build with agpgart support, I think
your system will work with 4.0.1.
But I can't be sure. :)
Best of luck.
* Chung, Ha-Nyung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001016 06:14]:
Check you /etc/X11/XF86Config file. I bet you have references to the 75
and 100 dpi fonts in your fontpath before the font server. Also try
adding :noscale to the end of the 75dpi and 100dpi font directories.
HTH
* Fabricio Matheus Goncalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001016 09:28]:
>
> OS: Debian Gnu
> > Binary compatibility means you con run programs linked against older
> > libraries. Guess what, X and the libX11 linked apps still work don't they?
>
> To me "binary compatible" means that, things act as they did before
> ... when linked with the old library. Which includes being able to
> "r
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:53:29PM -0500, Derek J Witt wrote:
> > Hi, all. I figured out a way to resolve the "parent not composite" errors
> > I've been getting from the xaw packages. I tried running apt-get to
> > install X from the phase2 debbies. Of course, I started getting the
> > error.
OS: Debian Gnu/Linux 2.2
Aplication: xfs (XFree86) 3.3.6-11
Problem: In redhat with the same XFree version (3.3.6) it can display nice
large fonts.
Now using debian that fonts show broken, a think that is missing
anti-aliasing, but i dont know.
When i point my debian X to use a redhat xfs runnin
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I cannot link any more against libX
Chung, (or is it Ha-Nyung?)
I believe the DRI/AGP features require a much newer kernel. If you try
kernel 2.4.0-test*, being sure to build with agpgart support, I think
your system will work with 4.0.1.
But I can't be sure. :)
Best of luck.
* Chung, Ha-Nyung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001016 06:14]:
Check you /etc/X11/XF86Config file. I bet you have references to the 75
and 100 dpi fonts in your fontpath before the font server. Also try
adding :noscale to the end of the 75dpi and 100dpi font directories.
HTH
* Fabricio Matheus Goncalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001016 09:28]:
>
> OS: Debian Gn
Well before X4 debs existed at all, I had a method (put together specifically
for getting nVidia cards working with debian) for instaling X4 from source so
that it sits in a seperate tree, alongside your normal debian X3.3.6 install. I
wrote a quick HOWTO (basically for members of my local LUG), w
I've finally got these compiled for Sparc. I haven't sent my patches to
Branden yet, but will soon. This is in the middle of uploading. Check the
.changes to make sure everything is there that you need. Yes, I built the
_all.deb packages too, but that's just to avoid version mismatches with
branden
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:53:29PM -0500, Derek J Witt wrote:
> > Hi, all. I figured out a way to resolve the "parent not composite" errors
> > I've been getting from the xaw packages. I tried running apt-get to
> > install X from the phase2 debbies. Of course, I started getting the
> > error.
OS: Debian Gnu/Linux 2.2
Aplication: xfs (XFree86) 3.3.6-11
Problem: In redhat with the same XFree version (3.3.6) it can display nice
large fonts.
Now using debian that fonts show broken, a think that is missing
anti-aliasing, but i dont know.
When i point my debian X to use a redhat xfs runni
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> If I try to open a menu with gv it aborts with the following
> error:
>
> Error: XtMakeGeometryRequest - parent not composite
>
> This might be an X problem, I've never seen it on any other version
> of X.
This has been mentioned on this list along
If I try to open a menu with gv it aborts with the following
error:
Error: XtMakeGeometryRequest - parent not composite
This might be an X problem, I've never seen it on any other version
of X.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:38:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> If someone gives me some (POSIX) shell scriptage, invoking no commands
> that aren't in essential packages, which will decisively determine whether
> or not a system is using devfs, I will add support for devfs filenames in
> the m
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:41:00AM -0500, Derek J Witt wrote:
> I also found this to work as well:
>
> ===
>
> #!/bin/sh
> DEVFS=`grep devfs /proc/filesystems | cut -f2`
>
> [ $DEVFS = "devfs" ] && echo "You're using devfs. :-)"
Needs to be more complex:
#!/bin/sh
# They may have more th
Currently, I update X to 4.0.1 phase2, maybe correct?, in woody.
I'm using Compaq Deskpro with VGA card using i810 chipset.
With XF86 3.3.6, I have no problem using X with this machine,
but after updating I got the error during startx.
/var/log/XFree86.0.log file is following...
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined
Dear debian-xers,
Thanks to Branden's debs I have the phase2 4.0.1 v15 debs running very
smoothly at home on woody on a GeForce 2 MX machine with the NVidia
drivers.
I'm getting a work machine now with a GeForce 2 GTS 64MB and am obviously
putting debian on it, but I'd really prefer running potat
Well before X4 debs existed at all, I had a method (put together specifically
for getting nVidia cards working with debian) for instaling X4 from source so
that it sits in a seperate tree, alongside your normal debian X3.3.6 install. I
wrote a quick HOWTO (basically for members of my local LUG),
I've finally got these compiled for Sparc. I haven't sent my patches to
Branden yet, but will soon. This is in the middle of uploading. Check the
.changes to make sure everything is there that you need. Yes, I built the
_all.deb packages too, but that's just to avoid version mismatches with
brande
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> If I try to open a menu with gv it aborts with the following
> error:
>
> Error: XtMakeGeometryRequest - parent not composite
>
> This might be an X problem, I've never seen it on any other version
> of X.
This has been mentioned on this list along
If I try to open a menu with gv it aborts with the following
error:
Error: XtMakeGeometryRequest - parent not composite
This might be an X problem, I've never seen it on any other version
of X.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing i
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:38:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> If someone gives me some (POSIX) shell scriptage, invoking no commands
> that aren't in essential packages, which will decisively determine whether
> or not a system is using devfs, I will add support for devfs filenames in
> the
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefine
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:41:00AM -0500, Derek J Witt wrote:
> I also found this to work as well:
>
> ===
>
> #!/bin/sh
> DEVFS=`grep devfs /proc/filesystems | cut -f2`
>
> [ $DEVFS = "devfs" ] && echo "You're using devfs. :-)"
Needs to be more complex:
#!/bin/sh
# They may have more t
Currently, I update X to 4.0.1 phase2, maybe correct?, in woody.
I'm using Compaq Deskpro with VGA card using i810 chipset.
With XF86 3.3.6, I have no problem using X with this machine,
but after updating I got the error during startx.
/var/log/XFree86.0.log file is following...
---
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefine
Dear debian-xers,
Thanks to Branden's debs I have the phase2 4.0.1 v15 debs running very
smoothly at home on woody on a GeForce 2 MX machine with the NVidia
drivers.
I'm getting a work machine now with a GeForce 2 GTS 64MB and am obviously
putting debian on it, but I'd really prefer running pota
I also found this to work as well:
===
#!/bin/sh
DEVFS=`grep devfs /proc/filesystems | cut -f2`
[ $DEVFS = "devfs" ] && echo "You're using devfs. :-)"
===
Looks like it's going to be a simple thing to test anyway we do it. :-)
** Derek J Witt
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:02:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> To compile against a library built under an old glibc, the library
> needs to be recompiled to the new libc. I think there's already a
> forthcoming X 3.3.6 upgrade which will be rebuilt against woody glibc -
> right, Branden?
N
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:38:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> If someone gives me some (POSIX) shell scriptage, invoking no commands
> that aren't in essential packages, which will decisively determine whether
> or not a system is using devfs, I will add support for devfs filenames in
> the m
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:53:29PM -0500, Derek J Witt wrote:
> Hi, all. I figured out a way to resolve the "parent not composite" errors
> I've been getting from the xaw packages. I tried running apt-get to
> install X from the phase2 debbies. Of course, I started getting the
> error.
I talked t
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 02:00:15PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> I just apt-get upgraded my system, and watched these messages roll past.
> Has anyone else seen them, and if so, is this something that Branden
> should know about or does know about? (Back to the `I don't support
> upgrades between the
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 07:58:26PM +0200, Rafal Krzewski wrote:
> Upgrades v13-v15 and v15-v17 also worked great, which means that either
> I'm lucky or the phase2 packages are in better shape that it is widely
> advertised :)
Ssh! Quiet!
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 06:03:12PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 02:23:49PM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 09:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Obviously the server list in dexter needs to be different on non-i386,
> > > aswell as the generated k
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:51:34AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> I like bug report like this one. Helix package and xlib6g 4.0
Yes, I like it too; cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlib6g.files with 4.0.1
installed shows me tons and tons of shared objects...
--
G. Branden Robinson |Sof
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 02:38:16AM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001013 20:20]:
> > but what about the libGLU and libGL libraries? don't you need those. At
> > the moment I have the Utah ones is that enough.
>
> Well, yes, you do. XF86 4.0.1 currently provides li
If someone gives me some (POSIX) shell scriptage, invoking no commands
that aren't in essential packages, which will decisively determine whether
or not a system is using devfs, I will add support for devfs filenames in
the mouse configuration section.
But not before; it's beyond my current knowle
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 04:20:31AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I hadn't extensively played with it either, since I have a rather custom
> config (dual head with fixed-frequency monitors). Though, it would be
> nice if dexter could accept more monitor information, perhaps even a full
> XFree8
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:42:18PM -0500, Derek J Witt wrote:
> Is xaw95g based on xaw3d or xaw6/7?
AFAIK, xaw95g and xaw3d are distinct forks of Xaw6. Xaw7 did not yet exist
at the time they were written, which was years ago.
--
G. Branden Robinson |The greatest productive forc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 72041 normal
Bug#72041: xfree86-1: [hurd]: Support for the Hurd
Severity set to `normal'.
> severity 72135 normal
Bug#72135: xfree86-1: [hurd] Further porting
Severity set to `normal'.
> severity 70750 normal
Bug#70750: xserver-svga: killing
He doesn't describe what he means by "latest"; I presume official.
Does 3.3.6-11 (which was built against glibc 2.1.3) not work with 2.1.94?
- Forwarded message from Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Forwarded message from Gábor Lipták <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Gábor" "Lipták" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re. xserver-common 4.0.1
Date: 13 Oct 00 22:32:55 EDT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (34FM.0700
I also found this to work as well:
===
#!/bin/sh
DEVFS=`grep devfs /proc/filesystems | cut -f2`
[ $DEVFS = "devfs" ] && echo "You're using devfs. :-)"
===
Looks like it's going to be a simple thing to test anyway we do it. :-)
** Derek J Witt
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:02:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> To compile against a library built under an old glibc, the library
> needs to be recompiled to the new libc. I think there's already a
> forthcoming X 3.3.6 upgrade which will be rebuilt against woody glibc -
> right, Branden?
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> >
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0'
> >
> > this shows, even if I link a mi
52 matches
Mail list logo