Hello everyone,
we (debian-www) are working on a new page about Debian derivatives for
www.d.o.
Currently, the page https://www.debian.org/misc/children-distros.fr.html
provides a list of derivatives but it's not maintained. The wiki
provides a list too (https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Census
Le 30/01/2017 à 08:52, Paul Wise a écrit :
> We need a discussion with Debian (on debian-project) about the
> criteria for derivatives being listed on the website. I think that
> mail should start with the history of the misc/children-distros page
> and in doing so indicate that we need a criteria
Hi,
This doesn't read well:
https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#subunsub
in particular the following:
"If you are uncertain as to whether you are subscribed to a mailing
list of ours, send mail to majord...@lists.debian.org with
which your.email@address in the body."
--
The media's the mos
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> Note: This message is cross-posted because we need several points of
> view at the same time.
These should have been completely different discussions asking much
more specific things.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> I send an e-mail to these lists + adrian.
It would have been better to have separate threads.
> I don't know how the feeback will come but if there are several
> iterations, perhaps it would be nice to send a message to the translator
> t
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:48 PM, cbannister wrote:
> This doesn't read well:
...
> "If you are uncertain as to whether you are subscribed to a mailing
> list of ours, send mail to majord...@lists.debian.org with
> which your.email@address in the body."
Could you suggest an alternate wording?
--
On Thu 02 Feb 2017 at 20:31:54 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:48 PM, cbannister wrote:
>
> > This doesn't read well:
> ...
> > "If you are uncertain as to whether you are subscribed to a mailing
> > list of ours, send mail to majord...@lists.debian.org with
> > which your.emai
My gut feeling is the Derivatives page should be the page that lists
distros derived from or "children" of Debian. Creating a new page is just
more effort when the hard word has been done already.
On 2 February 2017 at 19:21, Stéphane Blondon
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> we (debian-www) are work
I do not think the web site or installation guide do a good job steering users
toward verifying downloaded installation media. Many people do know where the
information is: You just remove the filename from any download URL and it
brings you to the appropriate page with the appropriate checksum
Hi,
On the jessie-backports package of "dehydrated"[1], when I click the
"list of files" link[2] I get an error: "No such package in this suite
on this architecture."
[1] https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backports/dehydrated
[2] https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backports/all/dehydrated/fileli
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Leon Traille wrote:
> I think that suggesting and linking to verification instructions would
> further the interests of Internet users.
Could you suggest which web pages we should modify and what the new
wording on those pages should be?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wik
11 matches
Mail list logo
