mistake in Japanse document

2012-02-21 Thread says
Hello. I found mistake in Debian reference Japanese document, section 5.2.1 http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.ja.html It' written, however, the file path is wrong. >例えば、"/etc/passwd" は以下の内容です。 A correct answer is "/etc/hosts." thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#652631: www.debian.org: please clarify the distinction between 'events@d.o' and 'debian-events-*@lists.d.o'

2012-02-21 Thread Francesca Ciceri
Hi all, sorry for the late reply on this important discussion: lately I was really really busy (in real life) and I just did Debian work if cruelly pinged ;). First of all, just a correction: On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 01:30:10AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On 12/25/2011 11:11 PM, Arne Wichmann wr

Re: mistake in Japanse document

2012-02-21 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Forwarding to Osamu who is in charge of the debian-reference (not the webteam). Le 21/02/2012 03:31, s...@ba2.so-net.ne.jp a écrit : > Hello. > > I found mistake in Debian reference Japanese document, section 5.2.1 > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.ja.html > > It' wr

Re: mistake in Japanse document

2012-02-21 Thread Osamu Aoki
Merci! On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:31:22AM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Hi, > > Forwarding to Osamu who is in charge of the debian-reference (not the > webteam). > > Le 21/02/2012 03:31, s...@ba2.so-net.ne.jp a écrit : > > Hello. > > > > I found mistake in Debian reference Japanese document, sec

Bug#660707: www.debian.org: an invalid XML/XHTML syntax in anchor tag's href attribute format on /cvs/webwml/english/News/weekly/2012/03/index.wml

2012-02-21 Thread David Prévot
Hi Ryuunosuke, Le 21/02/2012 02:47, AYANOKOUZI, Ryuunosuke a écrit : >> So what is the point of fixing the source if the generated file is >> correct (WML source file are not meant to be XML valid)? It's one of the >> WML feature to fix those details. Please note that we have a daily run >> to ch

[p.d.o] package content search not possible

2012-02-21 Thread Thilo Six
Hello it seems that it is currently not possible to search through the contents of unstable packages whereas contents of stable packages seem to work fine. More precise, it seems only stable package contents search seem to work. compare: http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keyword

Bug#655639: marked as done ([www.debian.org] Awards: Linux New Media Awards entry does not link to Linux New Media announcement)

2012-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:22:46 -0400 with message-id <4f43ef06.1010...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#655639: [www.debian.org] Awards: Linux New Media Awards entry does not link to Linux New Media announcement has caused the Debian Bug report #655639, regarding [www.debian.org]

Bug#660784: [www.debian.org] "Setting up a Debian archive mirror": ftp.debian.org is no (longer) in the United States

2012-02-21 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal According to the "Where to mirror from" section of "Setting up a Debian archive mirror", |ftp.debian.org| is merely one of several servers that get updated from an internal Debian server. That address is presently located on a single server in the Uni

Bug#660784: marked as done ([www.debian.org] "Setting up a Debian archive mirror": ftp.debian.org is no (longer) in the United States)

2012-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:46:11 +0100 with message-id <20120221204611.gn28...@glenfiddich.mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#660784: [www.debian.org] "Setting up a Debian archive mirror": ftp.debian.org is no (longer) in the United States has caused the Debian Bug report #660784, rega

Bug#657557: [PATCH] Alternate patch for missing long descriptions

2012-02-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: www.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #657557 Hi, Cyril and I disagree about the cause for the missing description and the fix for it. So someone impartial please look over both out patches and see which makes more sense. In both cases the english translations must be added to ddtplangs [Patc

Bug#657557: [PATCH] Alternate patch for missing long descriptions

2012-02-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Goswin von Brederlow (22/02/2012): > Cyril and I disagree about the cause for the missing description and > the fix for it. Wrong, again. Please stop harrassing me, pretty fucking please. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#657557: [PATCH] Alternate patch for missing long descriptions

2012-02-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
For the sake of getting my fellow packages/translations maintainers to get the whole picture since you insist so much on proposing a wrong solution and calling mine “papering over the bug”, I'll reply anyway. Goswin von Brederlow (22/02/2012): > Now my patch (attached) fixes this problem by only