Hello,
Unfortunately, earlier this year, an error occurred on our servers and part
of the database was lost.
So some order have not been sent and others delayed.
To prevent further damage, we put the site offline this month of January
while the data is recovered and we entered into contact with cl
On sam., 2011-01-29 at 19:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 04:58:12PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
> >
> > a recent mail on debian-project asked for a crypto declaration file
> > number to the French authorities. There wasn't any so I did the request
> > and got the
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:59:00AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: minor
>
> The list of architectures on
> http://www.debian.org/ports/index.en.html could use an update. I'm
> noticing the following issues:
>
> amd64 is listed as AMD64 and EM64T, but not
On 2011-02-04 11:09, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:59:00AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
The list of architectures on
http://www.debian.org/ports/index.en.html could use an update. I'm
noticing the following issues:
amd64 is listed a
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:27:01PM +0100, Chris Leick wrote:
> please change in all german Debian websites »Debian Entwickler-Referenz«
> to »Debian-Entwicklerreferenz«. (e.g. in
> http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#devref
> http://www.debian.org/doc/
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manua
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
reassign 611671 maint-guide
thanks
Le 04/02/2011 13:38, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit :
> Hello,
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:27:01PM +0100, Chris Leick wrote:
>> please change in all german Debian websites »Debian Entwickler-Referenz«
>> to »Debian-En
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 611671 maint-guide
Bug #611671 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: [INTL:de] Errors in some german
websites
Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'maint-guide'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions -.
> thanks
Stopping proces
On 02/04/2011 01:36 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I actually filed this report when reviewing the release notes. I found
> these "PC" descriptions vague/ambiguous. For example, a 32-bit PowerPC
> is not i386. I think we should stick to x86 and x86-64, possibly
> mentioning AMD64 and Intel 64. If no
On 2011-02-04 13:53, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 02/04/2011 01:36 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I actually filed this report when reviewing the release notes. I found
these "PC" descriptions vague/ambiguous. For example, a 32-bit PowerPC
is not i386. I think we should stick to x86 and x86-64, possibly
Hello,
I'm contacting you from http://www.burmesepython.com . We offer the most
complete care guide available for the Burmese Python.
If you would consider adding a link to our site we will reciprocate by placing
your link on the following page: http://www.burmesepython.com/links.html
Please
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:36:43PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
...
> >I think we also need to update name to "32-bit PC (i386)" and "64-bit PC
> >(amd64)" in line with new release notes.
> > http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes
> > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
