Your message dated Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:33:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#472490: packages.debian.org volatile archive
referenced incorrectly
has caused the Debian Bug report #472490,
regarding packages.debian.org volatile archive referenced incorrectly
to be
Hi,
attached(proofed) are updates of the Chinese translation for w.d.o.
- w.d.o/intro/about [1]
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16321.html
--
Vern
2008-04-22
#use wml::debian::template title="Ãö©ó Debian"
#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.60"
# $Id: about
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:44:06PM +0800, Vern Sun wrote:
> attached(proofed) are updates of the Chinese translation for w.d.o.
> - w.d.o/intro/about [1]
Committed, thanks!
Vern, are you aware that this file was previously already translated
and got removed some time ago? So the old translation
Hello, I have a question, are the disc images for authorized cd vendors
different to the cd image available for download... I say it because I've seen
that they receive hicgh quality images.
Thank You, Jaime Hablutzel.
_
MSN Video.
Hello
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:09:24PM +0100, Jaime Hablutzel Egoavil wrote:
> Hello, I have a question, are the disc images for authorized cd
> vendors different to the cd image available for download... I say it
> because I've seen that they receive hicgh quality images.
See our commitment to
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Wiseman,
>
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 06:09:13PM -0500, Wiseman Cronos wrote:
> > Dear Debian's People:
> >
> > at page http://www.us.debian.org/releases/etch/credits at line 69 is
> written
> > "Direci n", when the right
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Jaime Hablutzel Egoavil wrote:
> Hello, I have a question, are the disc images for authorized cd
> vendors different to the cd image available for download... I say it
> because I've seen that they receive hicgh quality images.
There's no difference.
Don Armstrong
--
I sha
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:41:02PM -0500, Wiseman Cronos wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 06:09:13PM -0500, Wiseman Cronos wrote:
> > > Dear Debian's People:
> > >
> > > at page http://www.us.debian.org/releases/etch/cred
Hi!
It seems, that the create of the RDF feed for the weekly news is somehow
broken (that's why I disabled it for now in the Makefile).
I get the following error message:
==
~/debian/webwml/english/News/weekly$ make
../../../english/News/weekly/dwn-to-rdf.pl
Invalid format for date! at
/usr/
Hello brothers praise the lord amen. Brothers it is
Great pleasure to communicate with you
I am called Rukeribuga Fidel
I was borne east Africa country Rwanda,
I have 26 years old .may I request you
I wanted to ask you, to help me if you get my massage,
I need to continuer my sch
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:17:07PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> It seems, that the create of the RDF feed for the weekly news is somehow
> broken (that's why I disabled it for now in the Makefile).
[..]
> Anyone has an idea? Or can tell me, how to get more verbose output?
I think it should n
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:17:07PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Anyone has an idea? Or can tell me, how to get more verbose output?
The pubDate field only accepts RFC822 dates, not W3C ones. What we want is the
dc:date field.
Fix committed.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
* Simon Paillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080422 23:15]:
> I think it should not be related, but the only differences I see are :
> * 2008/index.wml is missing
Thanks for the hint; was present localy but forgot to add that. Done
now.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Di
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080422 23:20]:
> > Anyone has an idea? Or can tell me, how to get more verbose output?
[..]
> Fix committed.
Thanks!
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:17:07PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Anyone has an idea? Or can tell me, how to get more verbose output?
It works with the XML::RSS in etch, but not with the one in lenny.
What is weird is that the code that complains is for RSS 2.0 while we're
trying to create a R
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:45:26PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080422 23:20]:
> > > Anyone has an idea? Or can tell me, how to get more verbose output?
> [..]
> > Fix committed.
>
> Thanks!
While looking at the feed I noticed that adding HTML in the
16 matches
Mail list logo
