Hello,
Noticing that hurd-i386 was missing in
http://www.debian.org/mirrors/submit but available on mirrors, I
wondered why and found that hurd-i386 is missing in lenny/release.data
Is it on purpose or may I add hurd-i386 safely ?
Regards,
--
Simon Paillard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
I've been using Google Talk and thought you might like to try it out.
We can use it to call each other for free over the internet. Here's an
invitation to download Google Talk. Give it a try!
---
v vidhyadhar wants to stay in bet
Hi,
I'm quite aware that this might be the wrong place to report this, but
trying to download
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso I get redirected to http://www.laotzu.com/?dl=1 . Earlier today I was able to download t
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:26:06PM +0300, Paul Tötterman wrote:
> I'm quite aware that this might be the wrong place to report this,
You're true, the best place would have been debian-cd@
> but trying to download
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso
Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2007, 13:38 +0200 schrieb Simon Paillard:
> Noticing that hurd-i386 was missing in
> http://www.debian.org/mirrors/submit but available on mirrors, I
> wondered why and found that hurd-i386 is missing in lenny/release.data
You might also notice that m68k is missing in the l
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:57:40PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2007, 13:38 +0200 schrieb Simon Paillard:
> > Noticing that hurd-i386 was missing in
> > http://www.debian.org/mirrors/submit but available on mirrors, I
> > wondered why and found that hurd-i386 is missing in
reklamace
Vážení přátelé,
na adrese [EMAIL PROTECTED] zmizela data.
Žádám o laskavé, neprodlené vysvětlení na e-mail :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Za laskavé pochopení děkuje a v plné úctě zůstává
Ing. Jan Roub
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi
As you may (or may not) know proposed-updates is used as a basis for the
next point release. As such it would be good that people would use it
more so we find most bugs *before* a point release. To make this happen
I want to mention proposed-updates more visibly on the main website.
Does a
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 05:06:37PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:57:40PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2007, 13:38 +0200 schrieb Simon Paillard:
> > > Noticing that hurd-i386 was missing in
> > > http://www.debian.org/mirrors/submit but availabl
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:57:40PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> To my understanding the release.data contains architectures
> that are planned to get released with that release - and neither hurd
> nor m68k have qualified for that TTBOMK. I would be very careful about
> touching that part of the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> As you may (or may not) know proposed-updates is used as a basis for the
> next point release. As such it would be good that people would use it
> more so we find most bugs *before* a point release. To make this happen
> I want to ment
On 10/23/07, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > As you may (or may not) know proposed-updates is used as a basis for the
> > next point release. As such it would be good that people would use it
> > more so we find most bugs *befo
Hi,
> That's really nice. I have a few comments:
Thank you very much. I have inserted and merged your comments in
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWikiConventionsDiscussion
>The translation should use the subdirectories approach, similar to
>PortugueseBR, it makes it easier to build c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-10-2007 19:23, Salokine Terata wrote:
>> That's really nice. I have a few comments:
> Thank you very much. I have inserted and merged your comments in
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWikiConventionsDiscussion
You are welcome. Thanks
14 matches
Mail list logo
