On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:10:35AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>Merely lists which web pages are in scope -- but nothing of the
> audience. It also hand waves at the usual goodies: unified, accessible,
> no javascript or flash, etc. There is nothing concrete, or anything of
> any real su
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:29:47 +0200, Runa Agate Sandvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:10:35AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Merely lists which web pages are in scope -- but nothing of the
>> audience. It also hand waves at the usual goodies: unified,
>> accessible, no
* Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 12:49]:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:33:43PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> * I don't believe we should favor XML(-ish stuff) above simplified
>> markup when the target audience are humans. XML is good for many things
>> but definitely not for be
* Grégoire Duchêne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-22 11:18]:
> You won't educate users, and you cannot force them to read security
> advisories.
You can't force them to read them, but not giving them the chance to
and show them in that way that it in fact _is_ an important thing is a
wrong approach
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-26 00:10]:
> So, since my telepathy powers are obviously on the blink, can
> you tell me what the goals of the rewrite (apart from the 3 foot
> buzzwords of accessibility, browser independence, restrict javascript)
> are?
Ah, the usua
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-26 08:14]:
> If accessibility is a goal, how are you certain we are not
> meeting it? The web site has no javascript I can discern, it is
> localized in my language, it uses no flash, it is accessible y braille
> terminals. Have we not alr
* NAGY Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-23 11:09]:
> These constraints are quite strict. Are there any website statistics
> which prove that it's really worth to maintain website mirrors and give
> up using server-side dynamic content?
And what would you want to use server-side dynamic conte
* Alexsander Farias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 20:58]:
>I've tried to access today, for the first time, the address
> http://manpages.debian.net/, but the only thing that it showed was "it
> works". Is that right?
manpages.debian.net is not an official service from Debian (as can be
se
* Luca Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-21 15:50]:
> the page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages (that is,
> packages.debian.org) doesn't point to even existing
> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/, and /oldstable/
> (while does to /stable/, /testing/, and /unstable/).
>
> Is thi
* Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-23 12:48]:
> On Sunday 22 April 2007 17:52, Jens Seidel wrote:
>> In the last time I always wondered whether this refers to binary or
>> source packages. I know I could now parse "Packages" files and check but
>
> Hm, I just wondered what we actually m
Hi!
* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070426 15:33]:
> >>* I don't believe we should favor XML(-ish stuff) above simplified
> >> markup when the target audience are humans. XML is good for many things
> >> but definitely not for being edited by the casual user. BTW there are
> > XML is at
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-21 18:35]:
> For example, I really dislike that when I hit the mailing list
> archive link, instead of being shown the archives based on
> list/year/month directly, I am asked whether I want a developer mailing
> list or a user list. The a
Hi Debian people!
We would like to be added to the Debian CD vendors list. We're a small
open source group in Argentina triyng to spread the voice about
free/opensource software in Latin America. We think that selling
Debian CDs to the community is a positive action in that way. We'll be
glad of
On 2007-04-23T07:55:23+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was browsing through the site and noticed that even after i had changed to
> the spanish version, every time i clicked on a link it would take to the
> english version of the page.
That is because your have such settings in your web browser
23 квітня 2007 о 10:47 +0200 Wojciech Zareba написав(-ла):
> I have the same problem in Polish (becouse 18733 pakiety, but 18735
> pakietów). It would be solved by Perl script, I think, but as variable...
>
Ok, I did that with Ukrainian translation.
--
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
signature.asc
Desc
On 2007-04-26T17:20:59+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-23 12:48]:
>> Shouldn't we just replace the current value with e.g. 18,700? It's not
>> updated anyway, it's hardcoded in english/releases/info.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me, though I'm not the one
> MJ Ray schrieb:
> > Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> >
> >> * I don't believe we should favor XML(-ish stuff) above simplified
> >> markup when the target audience are humans. XML is good for many things
> >> but definitely not for being edited by the casual user. [...]
> >
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:03:20 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-26 08:14]:
>> If accessibility is a goal, how are you certain we are not meeting
>> it? The web site has no javascript I can discern, it is localized in
>> my language, i
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:51:26 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-26 00:10]:
>> So, since my telepathy powers are obviously on the blink, can you
>> tell me what the goals of the rewrite (apart from the 3 foot
>> buzzwords of access
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:25:40 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-21 18:35]:
>> For example, I really dislike that when I hit the mailing list
>> archive link, instead of being shown the archives based on
>> list/year/month directly, I
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>Merely lists which web pages are in scope -- but nothing of the
> audience. It also hand waves at the usual goodies: unified, accessible,
> no javascript or flash, etc. There is nothing concrete, or anything of
> any real substance here, when
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:00:53 +0200, Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>As far as I am concerned, looking prettier is exactly what I'd like
> to be achieved, nothing more. Please consider the layout change page a
> way to achieve a unified, more appealing website.
>I do not believe th
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Ah. If this is just about adding bling, and not about things
> like removing security advisories from the top page to help lambda
> users, then my interest in this efforts fade. Please ignore the noise,
> then. I would be interested in
23 matches
Mail list logo
