On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Merely lists which web pages are in scope -- but nothing of the > audience. It also hand waves at the usual goodies: unified, accessible, > no javascript or flash, etc. There is nothing concrete, or anything of > any real substance here, when it comes to real goals or a target > audience. > > [...] > > So, since my telepathy powers are obviously on the blink, can > you tell me what the goals of the rewrite (apart from the 30000 foot > buzzwords of accessibility, browser independence, restrict javascript) > are? What are we trying to achieve (well, apart from look prettier, and > perhaps reduce information presented [not sure about the last one]).
As far as I am concerned, looking prettier is exactly what I'd like to be achieved, nothing more. Please consider the layout change page a way to achieve a unified, more appealing website. I do not believe there is a priority conflict, since changing the layout is almost orthogonal to reorganising the website. They can be separate projects. In fact, the former hardly qualifies as a rewrite, since changing the layout could be done by only changing the CSS. Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
