Bug#245284: http://www.debian.org/security/2004/ is missing references to revised advisories like DSA 431-2

2004-04-23 Thread Matt Kraai
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:21:03PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > http://www.debian.org/security/2004 only lists the initial advisory > (DSA ???-1) but not revisions like DSA 431-2 > http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2004/msg00087.html At the bottom of the

Bug#245284: http://www.debian.org/security/2004/ is missing references to revised advisories like DSA 431-2

2004-04-23 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:13:32AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:21:03PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > http://www.debian.org/security/2004 only lists the initial advisory > > (DSA ???-1) but not revisions like DSA 431-2 > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announc

Bug#245284: http://www.debian.org/security/2004/ is missing references to revised advisories like DSA 431-2

2004-04-23 Thread Martin Schulze
Andreas Metzler wrote: > > At the bottom of the page for the DSA, there is a link to the > > revised advisory. Joey, shouldn't the header information be > > updated as well? > > At the bottom of the page are these two links: > | MD5 checksums of the listed files are available in the original > |

Bug#245284: http://www.debian.org/security/2004/ is missing references to revised advisories like DSA 431-2

2004-04-23 Thread Martin Schulze
Matt Kraai wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:21:03PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > http://www.debian.org/security/2004 only lists the initial advisory > > (DSA ???-1) but not revisions like DSA 431-2 > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2004/msg00087.h

Fixes for webwml://security/2004/CAN-2004-*.data

2004-04-23 Thread Frédéric Bothamy
Hello, 2 recently added webpages do not validate correctly (http://people.debian.org/~barbier/validate/en) : http://www.debian.org/security/2004/CAN-2004-0077 and http://www.debian.org/security/2004/CAN-2004-0109. Here is the proposed fix: Index: webwml/english/security/2004/CAN-2004-0077.data =

supersepx

2004-04-23 Thread cpbotha
Are you ready to boost your sedx life? get super viaxgra at only 3 dol! http://drcute.net/sv/index.php?pid=eph9058

Bug#245333: marked as done (packages.debian.org: link to each home page package)

2004-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:49:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245333: packages.debian.org: link to each home page package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#245284: http://www.debian.org/security/2004/ is missing references to revised advisories like DSA 431-2

2004-04-23 Thread Matt Kraai
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 11:27:18AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > At the bottom of the page for the DSA, there is a link to the > > > revised advisory. Joey, shouldn't the header information be > > > updated as well? > > > > At the bottom of the page are these two lin

Typos in website

2004-04-23 Thread Jens Seidel
Hi, I found again a few typos in english/ and the attached patch fixes these hopefully. Please proofread it. Jens Index: News/weekly/1999/31/index.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/News/weekly/1999/31/index.wml,v retrievi

Re: Typos in website

2004-04-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 17:23, Jens Seidel wrote: > Hi, > > I found again a few typos in english/ and the attached patch fixes these > hopefully. Please proofread it. [...] > -Also at LinuxWorld Expo, Corel demoed their Corel Linux Distribution, > based > +Also at LinuxWorld Expo, Corel demonstrate

Re: Typos in website

2004-04-23 Thread Jens Seidel
Hi Adam, thanks for your reply. It seems that I was wrong many times but I really try to fix each typo, ... So it's good that I asked on this list. On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:22:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 17:23, Jens Seidel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I found again a f

Re: Typos in website

2004-04-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 21:27, Jens Seidel wrote: > Hi Adam, > > thanks for your reply. It seems that I was wrong many times but I really > try to fix each typo, ... So it's good that I asked on this list. Thanks for your work on the site, and feel free to ignore any of my suggestions. I have a ten

Drop Weight Promptly

2004-04-23 Thread Latoyia
Page is loading.. Image not loading? See message here. Stop all announcements. lst3l0a5swm/U4PTt/pKmge03WevH.A6G8V/mMPR2/csARe. oka sxj, prqgl, dxuxf . yxtge malygb iacgj, xahgl, jjji . sgolo yavja mlmmnu, etyn, lciwnq . fzdsnx qsz wodia, eyzx, mxj . hgdat zwdovu ovx, jau, tym . xki tye egu

Bug#245590: Bad subversion url on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/svn

2004-04-23 Thread Cristian Rigamonti
Package: www.debian.org Severity: important The debian-installer subversion repository reported on the page http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/svn for anonymous checkout is wrong. The correct command for anonymous checkout is: svn co svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk d-i (as stated in

Please let the lessoften script do its job

2004-04-23 Thread Denis Barbier
Dear webmasters, the lessoften script has never been reactivated after the break-in. It is needed to generate w.d.o/intl/l10n/, could someone please make it run? Denis

Bug#245590: marked as done (Bad subversion url on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/svn)

2004-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 01:04:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245590: Bad subversion url on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/svn has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Re: Debian License Informations - a WML draft

2004-04-23 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 02:17:37AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > But, of course, you could also let it stay the current way. I for > > myself consider it most important that we actually publish the > > licenses rather soon than