THE-HANOREABLE---UNICEF----2000+1000+...

TO-THE-HANOREABLEUNICEF+INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org     NO.1.WEB.www.sun.comNO.2.WEB.www.unicefusa.orgNO.3.WEB.www.mirror.ac.uk/NO.4.WEB.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htmNO.5.WEB.www.unsystem.orgNO.6.WEB.www.nato.intNO.7.WEB.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.htmlNO.8.WE

Suggestion for To-Do List Page

Currently, on , we have a list of things to be done that users and developers can work on, though some are fairly limited to developers. I propose adding and especially

Bug#83701: marked as done (packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms has a package been compiled)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#215999: marked as done (packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is outdated)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#177669: marked as done (packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#221114: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#219653: marked as done (packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#162588: marked as done (packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#202157: marked as done (packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#130420: marked as done (packages.debian.org: should give link to copyright file)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:32:54 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#227273: packages.debian.org: charset mismatch (always in UTF-8?)

Package: www.debian.org Severity: important Dear webmasters, I'm pleased with packages.d.o is back online! But it causes mojibake by charset mismatch so we cannot read it without changing to correct charset. (mojibake: http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/mojibake/) For example, Japanese page

Bug#21620: marked as done (packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages should support multiple architectures)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Re: Suggestion for To-Do List Page

On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 14:38, Alexander Winston wrote: > Currently, on , we have a list of > things to be done that users and developers can work on, though some are > fairly limited to developers. I propose adding > and

Bug#155346: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package names when listing dependencies.)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#23350: marked as done (it should be possible to download binaries for other architectures)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#208513: marked as done (gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#225795: www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/xx is not updated now.

Hi Denis, >> umm... http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/ja is >> added its links, but not use update informaiton yet. > >Sorry if I was unclear, some scripts have to be enabled, but nobody >knows when they will be again, this is out of my control. >In the meantime, data are avai

packages.debian.org don't get right link for security

Hello. The download for security fon't work: i.e. from: http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/php4-dev then I click "all" to download the package...it will give me the normal mirror list, but the security packages arenot there. Please correct the script. Ciao cate

Re: packages.debian.org don't get right link for security

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:00:42PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > Hello. > > The download for security fon't work: i.e. from: > > http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/php4-dev > > then I click "all" to download the package...it will give > me the normal mirror list, but the security packa

Bug#146675: marked as done (Package description pages for pmud and pmud-utils unavailable)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#204099: marked as done (packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead to doubled dependencies)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#131631: marked as done (packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are missing)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#227108: www.debian.org: Please include co-maintained packages in Project Participants Page

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:58:52PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > tags 227108 unreproducible moreinfo > thanks > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 01:23:44PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > > Please include co-maintained packages in the listing for each person on > > http://www.debian.org/devel/people. T

Bug#141618: marked as done (non-i386 architecture specific packages are not browsable)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#135220: marked as done (packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and non-US/non-free mixed together)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no