Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2002 20:02:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 03 15:02:13 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from f04s07.cac.psu.edu (f04n07.cac.psu.edu) [128.118.141.35]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17b56H-0006qp-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 15:02:09 -0500
Received: from frankenstein (tnt2-164-244.cac.psu.edu [130.203.164.244])
by f04n07.cac.psu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA383014;
Sat, 3 Aug 2002 16:01:49 -0400
Received: from torrent ([192.168.1.15])
by frankenstein with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 17b55o-0000hP-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 16:01:40 -0400
Received: from daniel by torrent with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17b55c-0005dm-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 16:01:28 -0400
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 16:01:28 -0400
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bruce Pimenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: aptitude 0.2.11.1-3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 09:13:02PM +0200, Bruce Pimenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/aptitude.html
>
> missing link to the related package:
> libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2
>
> (aptitude 0.2.11.1-3 seems to need this package)
Hi,
The page you referenced is automatically generated from information
contained in the .deb file. Even if I wanted to change it, I couldn't.
libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2 is a virtual package, provided by the most
recent version of apt. Because of this, "apt" is listed among the
dependencies of aptitude. However, it would probably be useful if these
webpages noted when a dependency was via a virtual package, to reduce
this confusion. I'm reporting a bug against www.debian.org with this
email, so someone will take a look at it.
Daniel
--
/---------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------\
| "Witches and pickles went together like...she hesitated at |
| the stomach-curdling addition of peaches and cream, and |
| mentally substituted 'things that went together very well'" |
| -- Terry Pratchett |
\---- Be like the kid in the movie! Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org ---/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 155346-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:05:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References:
In-Reply-To:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):
* Contain information about non-i386 packages
Closes: #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
Closes: #23350 merged bug
Closes: #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated
* Include DDTP translations
* Better parsing/using of input data
Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared
* Handle virtual packages
Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies
* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages
Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big
* Minor fixes:
Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone
Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug Closes:
#221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview
I will leave "#224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not
restored" open until search_packages is back, too.
Special thanks to Joey for his work to get this done and to Joy for his
feedback while writing the scripts.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
