E-mail address listed incorrectly

Hello, My e-mail address is listed incorrectly as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" on http://www.debian.org/vote/2003/vote_0003 Can this please be fixed? Simon

Bug#172702: L@@K.we can sell your vacation...

Do you currently own a timeshare? Are you tired of paying high maintenence fees? Would you like to sell or rent your Timeshare for a profit? If so I can help you. My site is @ http://www.eworldwholesale.com/ Stop fooling around with companies that promise and don't deliver! Must be 18 years

Re: E-mail address listed incorrectly

Simon Law: > Can this please be fixed? I have committed a corrected version to the CVS, it should show up on the web site in a couple of hours. -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.

Re: Who's using Debian?

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:01:52 -0400 (CLT) Ricardo Yanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Departamento de Fisica, Universidad de Chile, Chile The site has been added to the "Who's using Debian" page, which will be updated shortly. Thanks for your support. -- Regards, Kaare -

Re: Who's using Debian

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:31:32 -0300 "Hoffice-Rafael Puyau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Home Office Telework International, Brasil The site has been added to the "Who's using Debian" page, which will be updated shortly. Thanks for your support. -- Regards, Kaare -

Re: Who's using Debian?

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:56:20 +0200 Dominique Guichaoua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Laboratoire POMA, University of Angers, France The site has been added to the "Who's using Debian" page, which will be updated shortly. Thanks for your support. -- Regards, Kaare -

Re: Who's using Debian?

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:04:49 -0700 Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We use (Libranet 2.8.1) Debian on our server and workstation computers [...] Debian only lists sites on its "Who's Using Debian" page, which uses its own distribution. However, we thank you for chosing a distribution based

DWN 30.09.2003 in Russian

Dear Peter Novodvorsky, At the end of DWN September 30, 2003 in Russian '... nedele "osiroteli" i trebuyut novogo soprovozhdayushchego 1 paket.' is written. It could be changed to '... nedele "osirotel" i trebuet novogo soprovozhdayushchego 1 paket.' ^^ Best reg

Re: Bug#213961: document MIA database

On 2003-10-04 04:04:52 +0100 Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-03 08:43]: The developers' corner or WNPP should contain information about the MIA database. How to find it, at least. It's in the Developers' Reference, no? http://www.uk.debia

Re: Bug#213961: document MIA database

reassign 213961 developers-reference thanks * MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-04 16:38]: > >>The developers' corner or WNPP should contain information about > >>the MIA database. How to find it, at least. > >It's in the Developers' Reference, no? > > http://www.uk.debian.org/doc/developers-r

Processed: Re: Bug#213961: document MIA database

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 213961 developers-reference Bug#213961: document MIA database Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `developers-reference'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#202303: marked as done (www.debian.org: /devel/join/newmaint should encourage to contribute before applying)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:00:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line New version committed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Re: DWN 30.09.2003 in Russian

Aiya! MS> At the end of DWN September 30, 2003 in Russian MS> '... nedele "osiroteli" i trebuyut novogo soprovozhdayushchego 1 paket.' MS> is written. It could be changed to MS> '... nedele "osirotel" i trebuet novogo soprovozhdayushchego 1 paket.' Fixed in CVS, will be visible in several hou

Bug#214130: www.debian.org: Debian WWW Pages License no longer has a copy of the license

Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-10-04 Severity: normal On http://www.debian.org/license we have a pointer to the Open Publication License, Draft v1.0. However, the link to http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ no longer resolves. We should keep a copy of the OPL on the Debian w

Bug#214130: www.debian.org: Debian WWW Pages License no longer has a copy of the license

On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:03:18PM -0400, Simon Law wrote: > On http://www.debian.org/license we have a pointer to the Open > Publication License, Draft v1.0. However, the link to > http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ no longer resolves. We should keep Hmm, works for me here? There is a note on

Bug#180180: marked as done (Encourage applicant to cross-sign DD key)

Your message dated Sun, 5 Oct 2003 00:23:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Added note has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#214130: www.debian.org: Debian WWW Pages License no longer has a copy of the license

On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:31:38AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:03:18PM -0400, Simon Law wrote: > > On http://www.debian.org/license we have a pointer to the Open > > Publication License, Draft v1.0. However, the link to > > http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ no lo