Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-15
Severity: normal
Hello,
I would like to add the following contact persons for the Debian internal
projects
Debian-Jr: ${HOME}/devel/debian-jr
Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian-Med: ${HOME}/devel/debian-med
Hi folks,
As in the last months the translation of the DWN into Spanish became a task
done in group, we started using CVS. Now that alioth has come, we considered
it could be a good idea to use it's cvs and tools.
Considering the possibility that any other translators (working in group or
not) co
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 08:08:09PM -0500, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=debian
> > gives the top hit as www.eff.org, not www.debian.org. Now the EFF is
> > a very worthy organisation with an excellent PageRank I'm sure, but
> > it's probably not what people were looking f
debian-www:您好!
音频干扰,录音噪声,诚信圣通
www.spwe.com
普通的监听器在传输距离超出100米后就会有很大的噪声，在应用于硬盘录象机时，录音噪声使得业主无法接收。
诚信圣通开发的监听器采用特殊的电路，可以消除音频干扰，传输距离可达300米以上。
应用领域：与硬盘录象机配套使用，广泛应用于安防、高速公路收费站等。
相关热门产品：地线回路平衡器－消除视频干扰
诚信圣通公司网站：http://www.spwe.com
联系电话：010-66027364、010-66026820
传 真：010-66025560
销售经理：王 亚
电话：010-6602736
Hi Friend ,
I sure wish I had powerful friends! Everybody's always
talking about making money online but when you really
look into it, only a few "well connected" people are
really cashing in.
As a single mother, I needed something that worked. Until
I found Frank's program, I'd LOST a lot
* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-15 00:45]:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml
> Module name: kt
> Changes by: honey 03/04/15 00:45:42
>
> Log message:
> Kernel Traffic PL
Uhm, WTF? Is this again a misplaced import? I have no idea what this
is about, and the README tells about a
* Adam DiCarlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-14 20:08]:
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> A google search for Debian
>> http://www.google.com/search?q=debian
>> gives the top hit as www.eff.org, not www.debian.org.
>
> Well, it must be because Google does result sorting based on how man
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Uhm, WTF? Is this again a misplaced import? I have no idea what this
> is about, and the README tells about a different server from what I can
> see
>
> Lukasz, can you please explain this?
it is already rmf-ed, I've submitted it by accident -
This site Well meet your highest expectations.
Watch non-stop full screen video clips of pure fucking sucking XXX madness!!!
CLICK HERE http://www.members.aol.com/starofwonder2/ NOW
if the links doesnt work then copy and paste this link in your webbrowser
http://www.members.aol.com/starofwonde
Followup-For: Bug #181872
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-15
Hi,
The page http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/sqcwa.html
has also this problem, but with a greater importance, since user
can not read some important information from the package description.
I s
Frank Lichtenheld said:
> > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting says:
> >
> > There is a program that we have developed in Debian to help reporting
> > bug reports, it's called reportbug. It will guide you through the bug
> > reporting process step by step, and probably ease filing bugs that w
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:58:05PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
[...]
> > > > + $long_desc =~ s/\&/\&\;/go;
> > >
> > > That sounds like a fix for another bug, and it doesn't look like it would
> > > actually handle the read &s in descriptions...
> >
> > You're right, that this line (a
Hi folks,
Thought I'd drop you a line to let you know that the package search on
debian.org is dead :( (500 Internal Server), the URL that's causing the
problem (my exact search) is;
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=djbdns&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > > > + $long_desc =~ s/\&/\&\;/go;
> > > >
> > > > That sounds like a fix for another bug, and it doesn't look like it
> > > > would
> > > > actually handle the read &s in descriptions...
> > >
> > > You're right,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:10:25PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
> While you're at it, I think "There is ..., it's called reportbug." is
> pretty ghastly.
Initially it made sorta sense because there were two programs.
Unfortunately, we ditched bug(1) and didn't rephrase the sentence nicely.
> How a
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 05:53:47PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > No, within plain text one writes http://foo.org/?a=1&b=2, escaping is only
> > performed for some other formats (SGML and co).
> > So unless descriptions are going to be
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:44:20PM +0100, Matt Wilson wrote:
> Thought I'd drop you a line to let you know that the package search on
> debian.org is dead :( (500 Internal Server), the URL that's causing the
> problem (my exact search) is;
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?
I've noticed that the "Search package directories" engine, located at
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages, returns only results for the i386
architecture. Would it be possible to include an architecture drop-down list
just like the one that "Search the contents of packages" has?
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You mean, people do http://www.eff.org/";>Debian and they
> are up there because of this? Or do I get you wrong? This sounds quite
> strange, IMHO.
>
> If that's not what you mean please clearify.
No, that's not what I mean. I mean their PageRank
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:16:45PM +0200, Carlos Izquierdo wrote:
>
> I've noticed that the "Search package directories" engine, located at
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages, returns only results for the i386
> architecture. Would it be possible to include an architecture drop-down
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 08:02:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:06:11PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I think it would be nice if intro/organziation were linked to from the
> > navbar on the left side of the site, just as most other intro/* pages
> > are. I would cal
Subject: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting: It is not clear how/if bugs are
forwarded upstream
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-15
Severity: normal
Hello,
While reporting several bugs I often wondered if the bugs are forwarded to
the upstream developers by the package ma
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:45:40PM +0200, Remco Seesink wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While reporting several bugs I often wondered if the bugs are forwarded to
> the upstream developers by the package maintainer, or if I should do this
> myself. I have found out that the tag upstream means the bug is not d
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:48:26 +0200
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think forwarding of bugs is not mentioned in Bugs/Reporting but
> Bugs/Developer, because you should _not_ do it. It's the task of
> the maintainer to decide this.
As a user and not developer, I did not read Bugs
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:32:44PM +0200, Remco Seesink wrote:
> > I think forwarding of bugs is not mentioned in Bugs/Reporting but
> > Bugs/Developer, because you should _not_ do it. It's the task of
> > the maintainer to decide this.
>
> As a user and not developer, I did not read Bugs/Develop
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:37:13 +0200
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a user and not developer, I did not read Bugs/Developer. How could I
> > have know not to report bugs upstream?
>
> Because... nobody tells you to? :)
But i am not only a debian user, I am also a user of upstream s
26 matches
Mail list logo
