Re: /org/search.debian.org/www/makelinks.sh

2001-12-16 Thread Tor Slettnes
> "Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Tor" == Tor Slettnes wrote: Tor> Is the 'makelinks.sh' script in search.debian.org run Tor> automatically (through Cron or otherwise)? Tor> If not, could someone run it? (To add Norwegian search) Josip> Sure, done.

the "linux" link in the first page...

2001-12-16 Thread Sidney Fong
Just a thought: would linking "linux" in the first page of http://www.debian.org to http://www.kernel.org be more appropriate? after all it is referring to the linux kernel.

Re: /org/search.debian.org/www/makelinks.sh

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 11:07:43PM -0800, Tor Slettnes wrote: > Tor> Is the 'makelinks.sh' script in search.debian.org run > Tor> automatically (through Cron or otherwise)? > Tor> If not, could someone run it? (To add Norwegian search) > > Josip> Sure, done. > > However, it looks

minor fix to mainpage.wml

2001-12-16 Thread Matt Kraai
Howdy, Under lynx, the main page link bar looks odd. There should be a tag after the link to the mailing list archives. I can't access CVS at the moment, so I'd appreciate it if someone could fix it. Matt --- mainpage.wml.orig Sun Dec 16 09:34:45 2001 +++ mainpage.wmlSun Dec 16 09:3

Processed: Re: Bug#124213: Add link from package information page to the list of versions

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 124213 www.debian.org Bug#124213: Add link from package information page to the list of versions Bug reassigned from package `packages.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'. > merge 59750 124213 Bug#59750: packages.debian.org: search results have no

Bug#124213: marked as done (Add link from package information page to the list of versions)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:41:38 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#59750: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search results have no pointers to newer versions)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:41:38 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Re: the "linux" link in the first page...

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 07:08:15PM +0800, Sidney Fong wrote: > Just a thought: > would linking "linux" in the first page of http://www.debian.org to > http://www.kernel.org be more appropriate? after all it is referring to > the linux kernel. Yes, we were going to do this a few months back b

Processed: oh fuck you

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 124213 normal Bug#124213: Add link from package information page to the list of versions Severity set to `normal'. > merge 59750 124213 Bug#59750: packages.debian.org: search results have no pointers to newer versions Bug#124213: Add link fro

debian-cd 9811

2001-12-16 Thread Gerhard Poul
The November 98 archive is no longer available (only in .gz format) for browsing. - is this intentional? why? IMHO it was _open_ before. - what has changed?

Processed: DWIMNWIS :)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 124213 wishlist Bug#124213: Add link from package information page to the list of versions Severity set to `wishlist'. > merge 59750 124213 Bug#59750: packages.debian.org: search results have no pointers to newer versions Bug#124213: Add link

Re: debian-cd 9811

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 02:12:44PM -0500, Gerhard Poul wrote: > The November 98 archive is no longer available (only in .gz format) for > browsing. - is this intentional? why? We didn't have enough disk space on the server to keep it uncompressed. > IMHO it was _open_ before. - what has changed?

Re: international/l10n (was: Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by danish: webwml/danish/international/l10n/data)

2001-12-16 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 07:20:08PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > Denis Barbier: > > >> Directory /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data > > this directory is useless. > > Which directories should be translated? Could you please put a README > file in english/international/l10n with in

Re: */todo.wml l10n pages make little sense

2001-12-16 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 07:15:26PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > Hi! > > What is "Those packages could not be parsed because of their source > format (e.g. an asterisk is put after packages in dbs format), [...]" > supposed to mean (templates/todo.wml), and likewise "Those packages are > either n

Re: Deliberate web site reorganization

2001-12-16 Thread Craig Small
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 01:18:02AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:41:31PM -0500, Jeff Albro wrote: > > If you take a look at the server logs, you can see where people went from > > the main page. (grep for home page as referring link) > > How does this work? I don't get it.

Re: Deliberate web site reorganization

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:55:54AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > > Maybe it's just that www.d.o Apache logs don't track referrers... > > Yeah, we got a crappy common format log instead of combined. This is an > example of combined: > 1.2.3.4 - - [17/Dec/2001:07:37:42 +1100] "GET /itools/nslookup.ph

Re: */todo.wml l10n pages make little sense

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > What I had in mind is that dbs suck when dealing with automatic extraction > of files, because there is no way to get them without building the package. 'make -f debian/sys-build.mk source.build' will unpack the source without buildi

Re: RFC: web site reorganization

2001-12-16 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 04:07:40PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:36:44PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > > Very nice proposal James, thanks for putting this together. I can see > > The awards icons along the bottom with a link to the Awards page would > > be nice. If we

Re: */todo.wml l10n pages make little sense

2001-12-16 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:10:00PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > What I had in mind is that dbs suck when dealing with automatic extraction > > of files, because there is no way to get them without building the package. > > 'make -f

Bug#98811: about XHTML compliance

2001-12-16 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 09:47:53PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi, > > It would be good if someone provided a thorough list of things we'd have to > change. It's not like me and other fifty or so people who edit the web pages > can't go to w3.org and read the 46 pages (+ the DTDs and whatnot) of t

Bug#98811: about XHTML compliance

2001-12-16 Thread Craig Small
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 09:47:53PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > It would be good if someone provided a thorough list of things we'd have to > change. It's not like me and other fifty or so people who edit the web pages > can't go to w3.org and read the 46 pages (+ the DTDs and whatnot) of the > spec

Re: RFC: web site reorganization

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:17:34AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > 2) Common log file really misses a lot of stuff What common log file? > 3) We don't have pre-processing of the logs to do resolving, shame > really. I've been meaning to set up jdresolve -n ... | webalizer but never got around to

Bug#98811: about XHTML compliance

2001-12-16 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:36:53AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 09:47:53PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > It would be good if someone provided a thorough list of things we'd have to > > change. It's not like me and other fifty or so people who edit the web pages > > can't go t

Link for volunteers

2001-12-16 Thread Grant Bowman
This link http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ is good, and I think it should be linked to from http://www.debian.org/intro/ so that people know we are a volunteer organization. A rewrite from another perspective is in order too, but I want to help with the website structure first. Keep up the good

Re: Deliberate web site reorganization

2001-12-16 Thread Grant Bowman
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011214 16:12]: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:41:31PM -0500, Jeff Albro wrote: > [...] > > Instead of a link to the security mailing list, let people input their > > e-mail address. > > That would be pushing it... like SatireWire.com says, "Gertrude Stein died > in

Bug#98811: about XHTML compliance

2001-12-16 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:28:27PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > nearly all required changes were already described in the bugreport: >a. Put all tags and attributes (but not attribute values) in lowercase > letters >b. Optional end tags are no more supported, so >some

Re: international/l10n (was: Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by danish: webwml/danish/international/l10n/data)

2001-12-16 Thread peter karlsson
Denis Barbier: > Huh? What's wrong with english/international/l10n/README? Ooops. Missed it. *hides in a corner* -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html